Thursday, December 22, 2011

Andy Ostroy Accuses Ron Paul of Racial Remarks while Admitting He May Not Have Written Them


2011’s Fraudie Recipient Solidifies His Third Consecutive Win

by Larry Simons
December 22, 2011

Ostroy has done it. He has finally written his very first article on Ron Paul. Not surprisingly he has chosen to hop aboard the smear Ron Paul wagon and make miserable attempts to label Ron Paul a racist for 20 year old newsletters that Ron Paul has repeatedly denied writing and has condemned on numerous occasions.

It is becoming obvious, even to the likes of people like Ostroy, that Ron Paul has now emerged as a rock-solid threat to capturing the GOP nomination, so the mainstream media, along with liberal hacks like Ostroy, are pulling no punches in digging up whatever they can to make Ron Paul’s poll numbers drop. This is all they can come up with on Ron Paul: 20 year old newsletters that were not even written by Ron Paul. Hilarious.

In fact, Ostroy even admits this in his article. Ostroy writes:

“And as for whether he's the actual writer or not, the offensive comments were made in his newsletters under his byline.”

Just to point out how easy this is to do [create a newsletter and attach Ron Paul’s name to it], I have created the “Andy Ostroy Political Report”, complete with racial comments. I will attribute these very words to Andy Ostroy. Why? Well, because I can. Here is the first issue: [click to enlarge]



See? Easy to do. I created it in under 10 minutes.

Will Andy admit to making these racial comments posted by me in his very first political report newsletter? Probably not. Why? Because he didn’t write them? Well, that’s a fair reason. But, will we believe him? Ostroy expects Ron Paul to admit to words he never wrote or endorsed, but will Ostroy admit to uttering the words in his newly created newsletter [above]? If not, why?? After all, look at the newsletter. It has the name "ANDY OSTROY" in real big fucking letters. That alone confirms he wrote them, does it not??

Ostroy also lies in the article when he says:

“Paul is a 1950's era Texan who's on record saying he doesn't believe in the 1964 Civil Rights act.”

First, Ron Paul was not born in Texas. He did not move to Texas until he was 33 years old. So, he’s not a Texan. As far as the Civil Rights act, Ron Paul endorses civil rights. My goodness, he’s a libertarian! He has said over and over [only for it to fall on the deaf ears of liberals] that he does not favor the government legislating civil rights.

I posted this on Ostroy’s blog. Naturally Ostroy will not approve of the comments, so here they are:

“Ostroy, youre a liar. Ron Paul did not write the newsletters. As for your comment "Paul is a 1950's era Texan who's on record saying he doesn't believe in the 1964 Civil Rights act."---wrong AGAIN. He believes in civil rights, he just disagrees that its the GOVERNMENTS' job to interfere in that and force people to act civil. It's a moral issue, not a LEGAL one that the government should interfere in.

If a restaurant owner doesnt want to serve a black person, they should not forced to by some civil rights law. They have the right NOT to serve them, but they will feel the reprocussions of that act. They will lose business because they are racists, no doubt. Not the governments job to interfere in that. THAT is all Ron Paul is saying in that issue. Nothing more, nothing less.

You did not post ONE link or ONE source in your article that proves Ron Paul wrote those letters. All you did was post quotes and say Ron Paul wrote them. That's not journalism and it's not fact-checking. It's propaganda and you should be ashamed.”


Of course, Ostroy is not ashamed at all. You have to be human first.

9 comments:

Anonymous said...

Ron Paul, ten years ago, took responsibility for the content, even admitted at one point that he had written some of them.

Today, Ron Paul claims he knew nothing about them even though they generated around a million dollars in income for him.

The newsletters were the “Ron Paul” newsletters and each was written in the first person as if from Ron Paul, without an author’s byline, conveying that the views expressed were Ron Paul’s.

No one doubts that someone other than Ron Paul wrote them, but they were written as if they were from Paul and he profited handsomely and at one point took responsibility for writing some of them himself.
=============

They *were* Ron Paul's newsletters - published under his name, and benefiting his organisation. Even gave a "free" book of his as part of subscription.

And the content is in fact the exact same guff that today appears at many websites of Ron Paul supporters - ie the contents of the newsletters are exactly as one would expect - it represents the real views of his constituency. As can be readily verified by anyone with access to Google.

Real Truth Online said...

"Ron Paul, ten years ago, took responsibility for the content, even admitted at one point that he had written some of them."

No links, no sources and no TRUTH to it, or you would provide proof. You have none..as usual.

"Today, Ron Paul claims he knew nothing about them even though they generated around a million dollars in income for him."

Again, no proof.

"The newsletters were the “Ron Paul” newsletters and each was written in the first person as if from Ron Paul, without an author’s byline, conveying that the views expressed were Ron Paul’s."

Again, no proof.

"..they were written as if they were from Paul and he profited handsomely and at one point took responsibility for writing some of them himself."

Proof???

"They *were* Ron Paul's newsletters - published under his name, and benefiting his organisation. Even gave a "free" book of his as part of subscription."

You can see in my post how easy it was for me to create an Andy Ostroy newsletter complete with racist comments, right?? RIGHT??? To my knowledge, Ostroy has not repudicated those remarks yet. He must be racist!!

"And the content is in fact the exact same guff that today appears at many websites of Ron Paul supporters - ie the contents of the newsletters are exactly as one would expect - it represents the real views of his constituency. As can be readily verified by anyone with access to Google."

His supporters are NOT HIM personally, which is the ENTIRE point of the story-----that they were supposedly written BY Ron Paul HIMSELF. You're just like Ostroy! Out one side of your ass say "it might have been RP" then out the other you say "it's HIM". Which is it? HIMSELF that wrote the letters or his SUPPORTERS or his CONSTITUENCY??

rob said...

i got it larry, ill prove last cock in mouth queenie fraud name left is a gay child molester, just look at my blog the info is right there, see i proved myself right.

Anonymous said...

wow rob it must be true if its on your blog. i had some doubt about it but sense you wrote it , it must be true.

Anonymous said...

is it me our is andy getting fatter by the year?

Anonymous said...

In the age of the internet, making anything of this story is ridiculous. Anyone can look up the history of this newsletter controversy and Ron Paul's responses to them. By doing this, they will see the politically-directed corruption that exists within the mainstream media. A good example from Google is CNN's edited hit piece that makes it appear he was storming out of the interview when questioned. Fox News blog also supported CNN's hit piece. But then the full version came out more recently and shows a completely different story in Ron Paul's favor. That media would be so corrupt to attempt to manipulate our elections rather than reporting on them is deplorable. Thank God for Google.

Googling also shows that the transcripts of the roughly dozen controversial newsletters exhibit many writing styles. It's obvious they were from part-time apprentice/ghost-writers known to have lived all over the united states. It's also obvious that he first took moral responsibility for them in the 90's because the statements appeared in his name. Sources such as Reason.com have already thoroughly investigated and verified that Ron Paul did not write them.

This story is waking voters up. Voters know that Paul is not a racist. Liberty is about treating everyone as individuals rather than groups after all. So this story is a much ado about nothing.

For those conservatives who think he can't win the election consider that Ron Paul is being attacked so viciously by the left because they know he can beat Obama in 2012.

rob said...

DR ron paul is the man. hes also a veteran.

Anonymous said...

"racial remarks"

oh, that's fine in Texas. We call it Freedom.

Anonymous said...

the last cock in mouth queenie fraud name left is exposed yet again.