Sunday, October 9, 2011
Moron Blogger Says the Holocaust Jews Would Have Been Committing A Crime if They Rose Up Against Hitler
The Jew-hater also states that if these Jews would have risen up against Hitler, Hitler would have been obeying the law if he had killed them for it
by Larry Simons
October 9, 2011
I have had a plethora of arguments with a fucknut known as “The Last Name Left” [he is too cowardly to give his real name] for more than a year now, but nothing this asshat has said in the past comes close to the monumental anti-Semitism and just plain bile he has spewed from his lying lips this time.
On October 3, this fraud posted words of Mike Rivero making comments about revolution. Rivero posted, “It is simple. Revolution equals a better life. Continued servitude to Wall Street DC equals….continued servitude to Wall Street DC. Any questions?”
TLNL calls this sedition and a crime, despite the fact that Thomas Jefferson penned in the Declaration of Independence these words:
“..whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness.”
Rivero’s crime? Echoing the words of one of the greatest Americans that ever lived. Oh my, shame on Rivero.
Then TLNL left quotes US Law concerning sedition/overthrow of government. It matters not to this buffoon that despite it being US law, it violates several rights outlined in the Bill of Rights including, freedom of speech, freedom of assembly and freedom of association. The Constitution is the supreme law in the United States. That means it trumps US law.
TLNL said this:
“If you think the founding fathers weren't intent on making sedition a crime after winning the revolution then you're a fool.”
John Adams signed into law the Alien and Sedition Acts of 1798, which many, including his Vice President Thomas Jefferson, criticized as unconstitutional. It eventually led to the demise of the Federalist party. It was eventually deemed unconstitutional by the House Judiciary Committee.
What TLNL fails to realize or comprehend is, is that, despite the Alien and Sedition Acts being highly unconstitutional, there was at least one justification for it [though it does not outweigh the unconstitutionality of it]: The country was much different during the Adams administration than today. The country in 1798 was not the monotheistic entity known as the "United States" then. Each state was sovereign and everyone highly believed in states rights. The government was not the highly centralized, protectionist form of government we have today. In 1798 the federal government served the people, not the other way around.
So, Adams was quite petrified that, just 20 short years after the formation of this country, people would begin to pledge allegiances to other countries. Adams had to know his signing the Alien and Sedition Acts was highly unconstitutional, so it had to be out of fear and panic that drove him to make unlawful one of the most basic rights the founders adopted. Despite all these vast differences between 1798 and today's world, it was still deemed unconstitutional even then. This is how devoted to liberty our founders were.
Judge Andrew P. Napolitano puts it brilliantly in his book, It Is Dangerous To Be Right, When The Government Is Wrong, when he states:
“As the Alien and Sedition Acts show, no government, not even one comprised of the Founders who sought to safeguard our natural rights, can be trusted to permit robust freedom of speech. How could members of the same generation, indeed in some instances the same persons, who wrote, “Congress shall make no law…abridging the freedom of speech,” enact a law that abridged it?”
Then, TLNL goes into waters in which he cannot escape. After saying Thomas Jefferson would be a criminal in today’s society, I asked him this:
“Would it have been considered SEDITION for the people to overthrow Hitler, although he was committing atrocities???”
“It would be a crime, under German/Nazi law. Hitler would have had anyone engaged in the least bit of sedition put to death.”
See for yourself
I asked why he hated Hitler if he believes the Jews, had they rebelled, would have been committing a crime and why he hated Hitler if he would have been obeying the law by murdering Jews for sedition.
I received no answer.
One side of his mouth, he is against anti-Semitism and Hitler. On the other side, he would have supported Hitler in exterminating anyone who openly rebelled against him [thus saving their lives].
This moron is batshit crazy.