Saturday, May 7, 2011

Bill Maher: Conspiracy Theorists Don't Think Bin Laden Carried Out 9/11. [Because the FBI Said He Didn't]


During “New Rules” segment, Maher insults 9/11 truthers by claiming it was them in whom the “Bin Laden never carried out 9/11” claim originated. In reality, truthers were just repeating what the FBI has claimed for 10 years: That on Bin Laden’s FBI profile, 9/11 was never listed among his crimes because there was insufficient evidence

by Larry Simons
May 7, 2011

On Friday’s episode of Real Time with Bill Maher, during his “New Rules” segment, Maher attacked 9/11 truthers with an all too common false claim that it was truthers who invented the claim that Osama bin Laden never carried out the 9/11 attacks. If Maher cared more about facts than his sad attempt to equate 9/11 truthers with crazy, paranoid tin foil hat-wearing people who believe it was really Bigfoot and aliens that killed JFK, he would have explained to his audience that the belief that Bin Laden never carried out 9/11 did not originate with 9/11 truthers, but from the FBI.

Rex Tomb, of the FBI’s public affairs office, stated in 2006, “The reason why 9/11 is not mentioned on Osama Bin Laden's Most Wanted page is because the FBI has no hard evidence connecting Bin Laden to 9/11.” [Emphasis added] It is a fact that 9/11 has never been mentioned on Bin Laden’s FBI profile. Here is a screen shot of his FBI profile I captured just days ago. It has never mentioned 9/11.



In a close-up of the same screen shot [below], you can see under Bin Laden's crimes, it states:

"Usama bin Laden is wanted in connection with the August 7, 1998, bombings of the United States embassies in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania, and Nairobi, Kenya. These attacks killed over 200 people. In addition, Bin Laden is a suspect in other terrorist attacks throughout the world."



You would think if there was evidence that Bin Laden killed over 3,000 people on 9/11, the FBI would not hesitate to include a larger number than 200 deaths. But, as you can see, 9/11 is nowhere to be found on his FBI profile, and Bill Maher wants his brain dead audience to believe that fact was created out of thin air by 9/11 truthers.

Of course, this does not stop Bill Maher from blatantly lying on national TV. In fact, Maher began the rant by stating another deception, that “conspiracy theorists […] are claiming that we didn’t really kill Bin Laden…”. In fact, most conspiracy theorists actually believe Bin Laden died as far back as 2001. For Maher to insinuate that conspiracy theorists “don’t think we killed Bin Laden” is an attempt to make them look kooky by stating a half-truth. Most conspiracy theorists believe that Osama has long been dead, and was not killed just days ago. They wouldn’t be the only ones. See here.

Here is the entirety to Maher’s lying rant on truthers Friday night: [watch segment here]

“Conspiracy theorists who are claiming that we didn’t really kill Bin Laden must be reminded that they didn’t think he did the crime in the first place. Come on nutjobs, keep your bullshit straight. The towers were brought down in a controlled demolition by George W. Bush to distract attention from Hawaii where CIA operatives were planting phony birth records so that a Kenyan named Obama could someday rise to power and pretend to take out the guy we pretended took out the towers. And I…and I know that’s true because I just got it in an email from Trump.”

It all boils down to the old, tiresome fact that people like Bill Maher, who are required to toe the line on official stories [because their jobs, reputations are careers are at stake], have no choice but to lie, distort the truth and ridicule those who search for the facts and ask hard questions because those facts do not coincide with their pre-conceived ideologies.

Maher was fired from his last job on Politically Incorrect by ABC in 2002 because of controversial comments regarding 9/11. Maher said on the show following 9/11, “We have been the cowards, lobbing cruise missiles from 2,000 miles away. That's cowardly. Staying in the airplane when it hits the building, say what you want about it, it's not cowardly”.

He is not about to open that can of worms again and get the boot a second time. This is why he never talks about 9/11 unless it is within the context of the official government conspiracy theory or an ad hominem attack rant against 9/11 truthers.

That is the definition of a coward.

33 comments:

the_last_name_left said...

"Maher insults 9/11 truthers by claiming it was them in whom the “Bin Laden never carried out 9/11” claim originated. In reality, truthers were just repeating what the FBI has claimed for 10 years: That on Bin Laden’s FBI profile, 9/11 was never listed among his crimes because there was insufficient evidence"

------------------

Show me where the FBI have been saying this for 10 years?

You merely produce a report from 2006 which says "X at FBI is reported to have said........there is no hard evidence linking Bin Laden to 911"

That is not evidence that the FBI have been saying it for 10 years.

It is only one suggestion that the FBI ever said it.

And moreover, it's just a report ....claiming someone else reported that someone at the FBI had said it......in 2006.

2006 is 5 years ago, not 10, or did you miss that?

Did you also miss the wiki article which you linked to?

It says

"The FBI stated that evidence linking Al-Qaeda and bin Laden to the attacks of September 11 is clear and irrefutable.[56]"

You just forgot to mention that?

the_last_name_left said...

your source for that report of a report....that someone at FBI said....no hard evidence against bin laden....well, your two references both link to the same source - The Mili Gazette....."Indian muslims' leading English newspaper".

Hmmm. Not quite the NewYorkTimes, is it?

And that's it? The sum of your evidence?

Doesn't take much to convince you, does it?

the_last_name_left said...

That Milli Gazette article you use in a futile effort to stand-up your claims is written by Enver Masud.

Now who is this Enver Masud?

He's a Troofer!!!!

Oh, some OBJECTIVE reporter he is, huh?

He's the author of a 911 conspiracy book! In his book preface he thanks Troofers.....

This book would not have been possible without your efforts. Give it to someone who may advance the cause of 9/11 truth.
Enver Masud
September 11, 2009


Awwwww - Troofers quoting troofers, quoting a report of someone claiming the FBI were reported to have said....something. Supposedly.

Oh yes, very convincing.

NEXT!!!

Real Truth Online said...

"Show me where the FBI have been saying this for 10 years?

You merely produce a report from 2006 which says "X at FBI is reported to have said........there is no hard evidence linking Bin Laden to 911"

That is not evidence that the FBI have been saying it for 10 years."

The FULL quote [of which you were careful to OMIT] says this:

"The reason why 9/11 is not mentioned on Osama Bin Laden's Most Wanted page is because the FBI has no hard evidence connecting Bin Laden to 9/11.”

Someone asked Rex Tomb IN 2006 why 9/11 was not on OBL's FBI profile----NOT that that was when the 9/11 omission was first discovered. The FBI has NEVER linked OBL to 9/11. His FBI profile has NEVER included 9/11. Nice try to make an attempt to use the 2006 date as if that was when the FBI page first did not mention 9/11, but that is not what the article of mine SAYS.

The 2006 question was asking why was the 9/11 omission ALREADY not included-----so obviously, if someone is asking why isn't it there in 2006, then it was omitted at an EARLIER time. Doofus!

"Did you also miss the wiki article which you linked to?

It says

"The FBI stated that evidence linking Al-Qaeda and bin Laden to the attacks of September 11 is clear and irrefutable.[56]""

That quote is irrelevant---because the FBI profile OMITS mention of 9/11. I posted the FBI page-----DID YOU MISS THAT???

You can post 600 quotes saying OBL is connected to 9/11, but none of them will supercede 9/11 being omitted from OBL's actual FBI profile. God you're a dickhead.

Real Truth Online said...

Any posts you write ridiculing the SOURCE of that quote by Rex Tomb doesn't matter---because the bottom line is---whether the quote is real or made up----the final result remains true---that 9/11 is OMITTED from OBL's FBI profile.

Are you THAT fucking stupid??

the_last_name_left said...

9/11 is OMITTED from OBL's FBI profile.
-----------------------

Which in your world means he didn't do it.

Bizarre.

Real Truth Online said...

This is becoming your new tactic: when you can't/won't/refuse to refute something I have said, even AFTER I have answered your questions---you DISAPPEAR for 12 days and when you come back IGNORE my comment from 12 days ago.

Then you have the fucking nerve to ask why I ignore questions? Because when I do answer them, you IGNORE my responses---indicating that you have been destroyed with facts.

But I see that you haven't abandoned your old tactic---of posting EXCERPTS of my post and making them appear as if it was the ENTIRE post, so that you can weasel out of ANSWERING the post.

What I posted 10 days ago:

"Any posts you write ridiculing the SOURCE of that quote by Rex Tomb doesn't matter---because the bottom line is---whether the quote is real or made up----the final result remains true---that 9/11 is OMITTED from OBL's FBI profile.

Are you THAT fucking stupid??"

What you re-posted of mine:

"9/11 is OMITTED from OBL's FBI profile."

Notice, you didn't post my comment to indicate that it was a PORTION of a quote, like this:

"....9/11 is OMITTED from OBL's FBI profile."

You posted it as if it was the ONLY thing I said, so you could AVOID what I said BEFORE that---and of course, everyone knows you did that because you HAVE NO ANSWER for the portion PRIOR to the portion you re-posted!

DISHONEST ASSHOLE!

the_last_name_left said...

L: 9/11 is OMITTED from OBL's FBI profile.
-----------------

Yes, but that doesn't mean your government did it.

Not difficult to understand, is it?

the_last_name_left said...

I'll do the difficult bit for you, Larry:

Question - "Is it impossible that OBL could have done 911, when his FBI profile doesn't explicitly mention it?"

Answer - "No"

Real Truth Online said...

"Yes, but that doesn't mean your government did it.

Not difficult to understand, is it?"

That's not what my story/post was about. It was about Maher suggesting that 9-11 TRUTHERS said Osama didn't carry out 9-11, and it was actually the FBI that said he didn't. Goodness, I thought my story was incredibly clear about that. Oh, I forgot...look who's reading it. Obviously, that WAS to difficult for YOU to understand!

Real Truth Online said...

"Question - "Is it impossible that OBL could have done 911, when his FBI profile doesn't explicitly mention it?"

Answer - "No""

Is it impossible he could have done it? OF COURSE NOT. But you don't invade two fucking countries on the premise that someone "COULD HAVE" done it---but only if there is sufficient evidence someone did it. Hell, using YOUR logic, Tony Blair could have done it, but we didn't invade England, did we?

The FBI has stated there is NOT sufficient evidence he did, and when 9/11 truthers simply echo the fact that even the FBI has not linked Osama to 9/11, then assholes like you and Bill Maher criticize truthers for it WHEN IT WAS NOT US WHO MADE THE CLAIM!

the_last_name_left said...

the FBI that said he didn't.
=============================


NO - the FBI said he did do it - they just didn't put it on their webpage.

Get it right.

Why didn't they update the webpage? I don't know - but nobody needed telling they thought OBL did it.

You've done nothing more than show that the FBI didn't put it on their webpage.

Big deal.

However, you lie when you claim that the FBI said he didn't do it.......they very clearly said he did - they just haven't put it on the website.

Why? Who knows? Entirely different matter to your claiming it means he didn't do it.

Real Truth Online said...

"NO - the FBI said he did do it - they just didn't put it on their webpage."

Show me ONR article, ONE link, ONE source that says the FBI HAS SUFFICIENT EVIDENCE THAT BIN LADEN CARRIED OUT 9/11.

Can you do that????

NO. YOU CAN'T.

Or are you telling me that our own FBI engages in the unlawful practice of ACCUSING people of crimes they have NO EVIDENCE they did? Are you telling me that??

I just asked TWO questions. Will you IGNORE them BOTH? I predict...YES.

Real Truth Online said...

"However, you lie when you claim that the FBI said he didn't do it.......they very clearly said he did - they just haven't put it on the website."

So, are you telling me that it would be FAIR and LAWFUL to accuse someone of committing an act they had NO EVIDENCE the accused committed?

OK, since you're saying that would be FAIR and LAWFUL-------then YOU carried out 9/11.

I announce today that THE LAST NAME LEFT COMMITTED THE CRIME OF 9/11!!!

Do I have evidence?? NO. But me just SAYING you carried out 9/11 is sufficient. Can I post on my blog that YOU masterminded 9/11 TLNL??? Can I? You just ADMITTED that the FBI is not required to produce evidence, so why do I need to?

Answer this question:

Can I post on my blog that YOU carried out 9/11 despite having NO evidence you did?? YES or NO??

Lack of an answer will be taken as a YES.

You wouldn't be able to report me to blogger.com because you JUST SAID people can be accused of crimes in which NO EVIDENCE is needed---right???

the_last_name_left said...

Well, quite so - if you put it on your website that I was responsible, does that mean I must have done it?

No.

Likewise if the FBI put it on their website.

Silly. It isn't complicated.

Larry said...

"Well, quite so - if you put it on your website that I was responsible, does that mean I must have done it?

No.

Likewise if the FBI put it on their website.

Silly. It isn't complicated."

Thak you for proving my point! Dipshit!

If the FBI HAD evidence they WOULD post it on their site. The didn't, so they omitted it. Posting someone did something does not PROVE they did it, but if there was EVIDENCE someone did, why the omission??? Do you realize how much you PROVE my points by the bullshit you post??

If I had evidence that you burned my house down [ie: videotape of it] why would I NOT post this on my site or NOT give it to the police??? That would be insane right???

You are claiming, by the FBI's omission of 9/11 on Osama's profile, that they did th insane thing I just mentioned above----WITHHELD evidence that would have incriminated him.

You're a DOUCHBAG!

the_last_name_left said...

The didn't, so they omitted it.
---------


how do you know? you don't.

Larry said...

"how do you know? you don't."

BRILLIANT answer, you piece of shit you. How do I know WHAT? How do I know the FBI did NOT have evidence? Because they fucking ADMITTED IT you asshole! Why would they OMIT a crime [albeit a MAJOR one like 9/11] from his FBI profile??? WHY???? To PROTECT him?? To make him appear NOT as bad as he is??? You're fucking INSANE!

Here's DICK CHENEY even admitting there has never been evidence Bin Laden was involved in 9/11:

http://www.youtube.com/
watch?v=KjxbhPl973g

Here's another video of a news report reporting it:

http://www.youtube.com/
watch?v=MBMv5qTtfmU&feature
=related

Type in these words "FBI admits no hard evidence linking bin laden to 9/11" and stand by for the shitload of links that talk about it.

When...OH WHEN will you answer my question:

Can I post on my blog that YOU carried out 9/11 since no evidence is required to make accusations against people for that crime???

the_last_name_left said...

http://www.fbi.gov/wanted/topten/usama-bin-laden

According to the FBI website he's dead.

So, according to you that must mean he really is dead.

It says

"Bin Laden is a suspect in other terrorist attacks throughout the world."

Do they really have to put 911 in the list?

In your stupid video Cheney clearly makes a mistake - seems obvious he meant to say no link between Iraq/Saddam Hussein and 911.....not Osama.

You might not know the FBI dispute the "no hard evidence line".

The FBI repeatedly say that evidence against OBL and 911 is clear and irrefutable.
----------------

See:

At the core of Ed Haas original piece is Rex Tomb's comment that there's "no hard evidence connecting bin Laden to 9/11". As this lacks clarity - there's no explanation of what "hard evidence" means - and the FBI now say it "does not accurately explain the situation", we see little reason for it to overturn other public statements by the FBI, where they make it clear that they believe evidence linking al Qaeda to the attacks is "clear and irrefutable."
Elsewhere there's little here but rhetoric and speculation. The fact that bin Laden hasn't been indicted for 9/11 is often taken as some sign of doubt of his guilt, for example, but as we've seen, he's not been indicted for the USS Cole bombing, either, despite being named as a co-conspirator in an indictment of others. Not being personally indicted for a crime isn't always an indication that the authorities think you may be innocent.

Real Truth Online said...

"According to the FBI website he's dead.

So, according to you that must mean he really is dead."

Yes, he really is DEAD. But that doesn't mean he JUST DIED a month ago. Naturally the FBI will follow the marching orders of the White House. Are you that stupid to suggest that the FBI will post that Osama is dead BEFORE there is some OFFICIAL announcement of his death by the government?

The ironic thing here is that according to YOU, the withholding of info [omitting info] from a website is not the litmus test in detemining whether something is true or not. [Example: the omission of Osama's involvement in 9/11 on the FBI site did not make you doubt that he did it....you STILL believed Osama carried out 9/11 DESPITE it being OMITTED on the FBI site]---so it stands to reason, once again...according to YOU [not ME] that just because the FBI site did NOT list Osama as dead from 2001 until before last month, doesn't mean he was NOT dead----CORRECT???? [I want a response to the entire above TWO paragraphs]

The bottom line here is this:

You will ALWAYS, WITHOUT DOUBT AND HESITATION, BELIEVE AND TRUST IN GOVERNMENT VERSIONS OF EVENTS......REGARDLESS. You do not question ANYTHING....EVER. In other words: If the government say one thing, you believe it. If they ignore another, you alway provide a reason WHY they ignored it even if it makes NO SENSE why the would ignore it. You don't question ANYTHING.....EVER.

I KNOW you will ignore this entire post because I completely crushed you with facts and buried you with your own contradictions.

Real Truth Online said...

"It says

"Bin Laden is a suspect in other terrorist attacks throughout the world."

Do they really have to put 911 in the list?"

Gee, let's see....uhhhhh YES!!!!! Since we invaded TWO fucking countries as a result of it, you fucking twerp!

If I robbed a bank and pickpocketed some old ladies on the street...and then a week later I blew up a building and killed 300 people, don't you think it would be a tad bit strange if the police put up a wanted sign and it ONLY mentioned my bank robbery and pickpocketing, and OMITTED the blown up building????

Nahhhhh, you wouldn't think that was strange at all, huh???? You stupid shithead.

Real Truth Online said...

"In your stupid video Cheney clearly makes a mistake - seems obvious he meant to say no link between Iraq/Saddam Hussein and 911.....not Osama."

Yeah, CLEARLY he meant Saddam. It's funny to see you PROTECT and DEFEND 'RIGHT' wing people just to attempt to win an argument with me. LOL.

"The FBI repeatedly say that evidence against OBL and 911 is clear and irrefutable."

Oh really??? Care to provide evidence of that?? Links please? So, you're saying the FBI just "FORGOT" to post on their site Osama killed 3,000 people???? God, you are the world's biggest fuck nut.

the_last_name_left said...

L: You will ALWAYS, WITHOUT DOUBT AND HESITATION, BELIEVE AND TRUST IN GOVERNMENT VERSIONS OF EVENTS......REGARDLESS.
------------------------

Rubbish. And you know it.

Your headline is still misleading - the FBI have NEVER said Bin Laden did not carry out 911.

They say he did. They say the evidence is clear and irrefutable.

This malarkey about the FBI website means nothing, but you can't grasp that fact.

Nor can you understand the simple fact that the FBI has NEVER said Bin Laden did not do 911. Your claims are completely distorted.

the_last_name_left said...

Here's what the FBI wrote a few days ago.......it is still on their website (so it must be true, according to Larry).

---------
"The mastermind of the attacks on September 11, 2001 that killed thousands of innocent men, women, and children has been killed.
.....
Intelligence agencies quickly learned that the 9/11 attacks were carried out by bin Laden’s terrorist organization, and in October 2001, his name was added to the U.S. Department of State’s Most Wanted Terrorists List.

FROM THE FBI WEBSITE:

http://www.fbi.gov/news/stories/2011/may/binladen_050211
-------------------------

Ok Larry?

So now you can stop pretending the FBI say they don't have evidence?

And admit your headline - and its meaning - is plain wrong.

Thanks.

Real Truth Online said...

"The mastermind of the attacks on September 11, 2001 that killed thousands of innocent men, women, and children has been killed."

This sentence is NOT an official announcement BY the FBI pinning 9/11 on Bin Laden. It is simply a statement written by some story writer stating his OPINION. It is NOT an official FBI announcement. It's no different than if you let ME guest write on YOUR blog and I wrote "The Last Name Left had sex with Michael Rivero last night". Does that make it true? Of course not. But you believe that some mysterious ghost writer on the FBI site is making an OFFICIAL announcement AS a representative for the FBI that Bin Laden carried out 9/11. You're PATHETIC.

"Intelligence agencies quickly learned that the 9/11 attacks were carried out by bin Laden’s terrorist organization, and in October 2001, his name was added to the U.S. Department of State’s Most Wanted Terrorists List."

Where in that sentence does it imply that Bin Laden HIMSELF is responsible for 9/11? It says "Bin Laden's TERRORIST ORGANIZATION". Yes, his name was added to the top 10 terror list-----for his OTHER crimes that the FBI has SUFFICIENT EVIDENCE for. 9/11 was not one of them...or else it would have been INCLUDED. BOTH screen shots of his FBI posters on that very link you posted DO NOT INCLUDE 9/11!!!

"So now you can stop pretending the FBI say they don't have evidence?

And admit your headline - and its meaning - is plain wrong."

So far, I have NOT seen an OFFICIAL FBI announcement that the FBI themselves ever accused Bin Laden of carrying out 9/11. The post you sent was just some writer who was giving his OPINION...BASED on Obama's speech that he even used as a REFERENCE to write his story. He posts the references at the bottom of the story.

The post you sent was a STORY, ghost-written by some writer that the FBI allowed on their site. This is NOT an OFFICIAL FBI announcement of Bin Laden being charged for 9/11. Are you that fucking DUMB???

Under the resource [at the bottom of your link] "Transcript of White House briefing", it say this:

"One courier in particular had our constant attention. Detainees gave us his nom de guerre or his nickname and identified him as both a protégé of Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, the mastermind of September 11th..."

There can't be TWO masterminds, so your ghost writer contradicted himself. He states that Bin Laden was the mastermind in his very first sentence, then uses as a resource for his article the White House briefing transcript that says KSM was the mastermind! TWO masterminds???

My goodness, you make this so fucking EASY.

the_last_name_left said...

L: Where in that sentence does it imply that Bin Laden HIMSELF is responsible for 9/11? It says "Bin Laden's TERRORIST ORGANIZATION".

--------------

Yes.......at the FBI website it says BIN LADEN responsible for 911.

Now, if you will notice........that's the exact opposite thing to what your story claims.

We finally got you to say it yourself.

Yes, the FBI website says "Bin Laden's Org responsible for 911".

Well done, Larry.

Real Truth Online said...

"Yes.......at the FBI website it says BIN LADEN responsible for 911.

Now, if you will notice........that's the exact opposite thing to what your story claims.

We finally got you to say it yourself."

I admitted NOTHING. I ADDRESSED the above comments on your PREVIOUS post asshole. It was NOT "the FBI" who made an OFFICIAL announcement that Bin Laden carried out 9/11, it was just some writer who used Obama's speeches as a resource, and it was posted on the FBI site-----that' night and day you dipshit.

I'm getting sick and fucking tired of you posting something, then I ADDRESS it, then you post the same goddamned post again. That's not an indication you care about the truth----that's done to provoke. Read my disclaimer above asshole. It says I may delete you if your intention is to provoke. That's EXACTLY what you're doing.

Question: If the TRUTH is on YOUR side and you think I'm a kook, why the need for provocation?????? Wouldn't the truth stand alone?

You completely IGNORED 90% of my posts yet AGAIN. Especially my question, are there TWO masterminds??

the_last_name_left said...

Larry now admits

"it was posted on the FBI site"

But now it doesn't count because it was written by 'just some writer'. LOL.

Who was the writer Larry? Someone whom writes News at the FBI website........

So.....the FBI then.

lol

Real Truth Online said...

"Who was the writer Larry? Someone whom writes News at the FBI website........

So.....the FBI then."

The writer failed to give his name [gee, who'se that sound like?] so therefore that writer has to go through no scrutiny or accusations because it is an unknown source. [Kinda like YOU on your blog...you never have to face any shame for FALSE information---which is rampant on your blog---because you hide your identity like a big fucking COWARD].

If Bin Laden was REALLY accused of 9/11, there would be no ambiguity, and the FBI would take full credit for the story.

Let me put it in simpler terms for you:

It's EASY to declare someone guilty AFTER they have been assassinated. I will give you a perfect example---Lee Harvey Oswald. Even though he was ACCUSED of killing Kennedy, there was ZERO proof he did...ZERO. After his assassination, he was the sole person blamed for it and no further investigation ensued to find the "REAL" killer because the ACCUSED one was already dead and buried. Therefore, no trial has to take place and no evidence never needed to be presented. It was done and over with Oswald's asassination. End of story.

SAME with Bin Laden. Now that he is dead ["supposedly" just now] the FBI can now blame him officially because he is no longer WANTED for the crime. Now they don't have to catch him and prosecute him, because he's dead. Now they can say whatever they want about him, and any search for whoever may ACTUALLY pulled of 9/11 can cease [although no search for the REAL perpetrators ever actually began].

BEFORE his supposed recent death, while he was still WANTED, the FBI had NEVER said he was GUILTY of 9/11 because they had no proof, this is why it was NEVER posted on his FBI page....lack of proof. Now that he is dead and not WANTED, they can say whatever they want about him and no doubt probably tack on MORE crimes to his list, because now their boogie man will not be around to defend himself or deny it.

The fact that you can't figure this out for yourself and need ME to do it makes you the biggest dumbass that ever lived.

Find ONE link, ONE source that the FBI said Bin Laden DID carry out 9/11 BEFORE his death----as I have JUST stated how EASY it is to pin a crime on an assassinated person. Pinning guilt on someone AFTER a person's death means NOTHING, as I have just stated above.

Anonymous said...

last cock in mouth queeenie fraud name left is defeated again.

Anonymous said...

larry, has last cock in mouthy ever refuted or debunked you?

the_last_name_left said...

So, you're still convinced Cheney intended to say no evidence linking OBL with 911? You don't believe he meant to say Saddam and said OBL instead by mistake?

Why do you believe it??

Larry said...

I'm still waiting on you to address this:

"If Bin Laden was REALLY accused of 9/11, there would be no ambiguity, and the FBI would take full credit for the story.

Let me put it in simpler terms for you:

It's EASY to declare someone guilty AFTER they have been assassinated. I will give you a perfect example---Lee Harvey Oswald. Even though he was ACCUSED of killing Kennedy, there was ZERO proof he did...ZERO. After his assassination, he was the sole person blamed for it and no further investigation ensued to find the "REAL" killer because the ACCUSED one was already dead and buried. Therefore, no trial has to take place and no evidence never needed to be presented. It was done and over with Oswald's asassination. End of story.

SAME with Bin Laden. Now that he is dead ["supposedly" just now] the FBI can now blame him officially because he is no longer WANTED for the crime. Now they don't have to catch him and prosecute him, because he's dead. Now they can say whatever they want about him, and any search for whoever may ACTUALLY pulled of 9/11 can cease [although no search for the REAL perpetrators ever actually began].

BEFORE his supposed recent death, while he was still WANTED, the FBI had NEVER said he was GUILTY of 9/11 because they had no proof, this is why it was NEVER posted on his FBI page....lack of proof. Now that he is dead and not WANTED, they can say whatever they want about him and no doubt probably tack on MORE crimes to his list, because now their boogie man will not be around to defend himself or deny it.

The fact that you can't figure this out for yourself and need ME to do it makes you the biggest dumbass that ever lived.

Find ONE link, ONE source that the FBI said Bin Laden DID carry out 9/11 BEFORE his death----as I have JUST stated how EASY it is to pin a crime on an assassinated person. Pinning guilt on someone AFTER a person's death means NOTHING, as I have just stated above."


"So, you're still convinced Cheney intended to say no evidence linking OBL with 911? You don't believe he meant to say Saddam and said OBL instead by mistake?"

I have a better question for you:

Why is it that that 9/11 truthers get accused by saps like you of "making stuff up" and inserting our own "evidence" into a story where there IS no evidence in order for our conspiracy to work, but when we take someone's verbatim words literally, then you wonder why we believe their ACTUAL quotes?

Even YOU said on YOUR blog:

"You believe him [Bush] this time simply because you think it supports your conspiracy theory --- just as in general you don't believe conspiracy because of the evidence, you cherry-pick evidence which you believe supports your prejudice."

Notice how you NEVER say that we got the words and quotes WRONG. You ADMIT that the words are CORRECT, you just hold that the conclusion is wrong. So, we get accused of making up shit AND coming to the WRONG conclusions when we quote them verbatim????

How would a group of people EVER win an argument or debate if WHATEVER they say they either get accused of making shit up or quoting people with their EXACT words and coming to the wrong conclusion?

You are a shit head. Now, address my long quote from above.