Thursday, May 26, 2011

Lifestyles of the Religious Nutball: I Wish the Nut Would Have Been Right

Loonball Harold Camping now says end of the world will be in October, 2011, validating the old adage, “If at first you look like a huge dick, try, try again to be a colossal fucktard

by Larry Simons
May 26, 2011

We, as sane, rational and thinking humans, know that when we have made a complete fool out of ourselves, we take it on the chin, apologize and promise to never do it again. But, if you are Harold Camping, one of the biggest mentally disturbed Christian lunatics, you not only fail to apologize when you have shown the world that you are a complete jackass, you make a second attempt at showing the world you should be locked away in a dungeon, far away from the rest of thinking, rational and productive mankind.

After being dead wrong about the supposed “end of the world” that was to be May 21, 2011, Camping did not cut his losses and go quietly into the night, embarrassed, “flabbergasted” and back to his ministry where thousands of brain dead supporters still would follow this man off a cliff if he told them that Jesus would give them wings to fly to Heaven if they did.

No, on the contrary, Camping clarified his “prediction” by saying:

Were not changing a date at all; we’re just learning that we have to be a little more spiritual about this. But on Oct. 21, the world will be destroyed. It won’t be five months of destruction. It will come at once.

We don’t need to talk about it anymore. The world has been warned – my... it has been warned. We have done our share and the media picked it up. The world has been warned that it is under judgment.”

Apparently, Camping’s original prediction was that on May 21, some 200 million people were supposed to be raptured, and then the world was supposed to exist in a post-apocalyptic chaotic state for 5 months, when on October 21, the world would officially end.

Now, Camping is saying that his original prediction of 5 months of hell, before the real end in October, is reduced to everything happening all at once on October 21. Eat my shit Camping.

Crimson Hexagon, a social media monitoring company, analyzed over 500,000 rapture discussions over the past four days and they found that although most of them were not serious and mocked Camping, 3% of the people actually stated this rapture/end of the world bullshit brought them closer to God. 3% may not seem like a lot, but when you put that number in perspective, 3% of 500,000 is 15,000 people. If Camping asked for just a mere $70 from each of these 15,000 people, he would be a millionaire.

I wish Camping had been right. He stated that 200 million believers were supposed to disappear on May 21. Ahhhh. Can you imagine that? A planet without 200 million deranged lunatics dwelling among us. They would have been in Heaven, and the rest of us would have been too.

Sunday, May 22, 2011

Lifestyles of the Religious Nutball: Apocalypse Later

Many nutballs awaited the end of the world yesterday, only to find themselves having to explain today why they [and the Bible] should ever be taken seriously again

by Larry Simons
May 22, 2011 [yes, I survived!]

I should not even be giving this story the attention it so wrongfully deserved these past few weeks, but it is just so damned fun to ridicule the biggest nuts that ever lived: Religious people. Specifically, really wacko Christians like Harold Camping [pictured above], President of Family Radio, who, in addition to meaningless activities like reading the Bible, made a loonball end-of-the-world prediction that the world would end yesterday.

It appears that Camping did not just pull this date out of his 89-year-old ass, but actually did numerical calculating to come up with the date May 21, 2011.

Apparently, Camping used this “logic” to come up with the date:

1. The number five equals "atonement", the number ten equals "completeness", and the number seventeen equals "heaven".

2. Christ is said to have hung on the cross on April 1, 33 AD. The time between April 1, 33 AD and April 1, 2011 is 1,978 years.

3. If 1,978 is multiplied by 365.2422 days (the number of days in a solar, as distinct from lunar, year), the result is 722,449.

4. The time between April 1 and May 21 is 51 days.

5. 51 added to 722,449 is 722,500.

6. (5 × 10 × 17)2 or (atonement × completeness × heaven)2 also equals 722,500.

Holy jumping shitballs.

Can I make MY prediction now? OK, here goes:

1. God created Adam and Eve, that’s two people.
2. There are 39 books in the Old Testament. 39 X 2 is 78.
3. There were 10 commandments. 78 X 10= 780.
4. 780 years ago was the year 1231.
5. I have wiped my ass a total of 1,231 times from 1972 to yesterday.
6. Keep the 1,231 number in mind.
7. There were 12 disciples.
8. 12 times 2 equals 24.
9. There were 3 wise men. 24 + 3= 27.
10. There were 12 tribes of Israel.
11. 27 + 12= 39.
12. There are 39 years between 1972 [the year I first wiped my ass] and 2011.
13. Therefore, Jesus is coming back on [1231] December 31, 2011

One major issue I have with Camping's loonball prediction, aside from the obvious [that Christians are mentally ill and need psychiatric help], is that the very book in which he professes to be “always absolutely true” [the Bible] is apparently FALSE if Camping believes that a mere man can know the date of the end times.

Mark 13:32 states:

“No one knows about that day or hour, not even the angels in heaven, nor the Son, but only the Father.”

1 Thessalonians 5:2-4 states:

“for you know very well that the day of the Lord will come like a thief in the night. While people are saying, "Peace and safety," destruction will come on them suddenly, as labor pains on a pregnant woman, and they will not escape. But you, brothers, are not in darkness so that this day should surprise you like a thief.”

Apparently, Camping believes that he can predict when a thief will rob his house. Camping does not even believe in the very words he claims to be true. Why would he spend his time attempting to spread the word of a man he is not heeding the teachings of?

Now that another religious quack has been proven wrong…again, they can focus on coming up with an answer as to why we should believe in the Bible at all. These nutcases can join politicians and meteorologists in being the third profession in which one can be continually wrong and still keep their job.

Thursday, May 19, 2011

Kirk Cameron Criticizes Stephen Hawking, Saying He Has No Evidence There’s No Heaven…As if Cameron Has Evidence There IS One?

Cameron also criticizes John Lennon for his lyrics of his song “Imagine”, showcasing that Cameron has no clue what the song means

by Larry Simons
May 19, 2011

I wrote a story in November of last year about ex-[lame] actress Candace Cameron-Bure after she told the 700 Club she knows she is going to heaven. Apparently, Cameron-Bure is not the only one in her family that has the supernatural power required to know what the afterlife holds, if there even is one. Enter brother Kirk [who has been a nut even longer than his sister], who has recently criticized the remarks made by physicist Stephen Hawking who said that Heaven is “a fairy story”.

Hawking’s exact words were, “There is no heaven or afterlife for broken-down computers; that is a fairy story for people afraid of the dark”. Cameron criticized that remark by saying, “Why should anyone believe Mr. Hawking's writings if he cannot provide evidence for his unscientific belief that out of nothing, everything came?” Funny, I do not see any evidence on Cameron’s part that Heaven actually exists either. Oh, that’s right…he doesn’t have to provide any. Why? That’s easy: Because the Bible says Heaven exists.

As long as Cameron relies on his circular reasoning that Heaven exists because God says it does, no proof whatsoever is required on his part. This has been the problem with religion in general, especially Christianity; that its followers need or require no proof whatsoever to believe in talking animals, 800 year-old men who build Titanic-sized boats [without hammers and nails] and men who can live inside whales for three days.

It just so happens that I agree with Cameron that “[Hawking] cannot provide evidence for his unscientific belief that out of nothing, everything came..” I agree only in the sense that in the same way Cameron cannot possibly know Heaven exists, Hawking cannot know God does not exist. Here’s the problem with Cameron’s statement: Hawking never admitted that his view on the origin of life was “unscientific”. In fact, he actually gave a scientific reason for it when he said in his 2010 book The Grand Design, “Because there is a law such as gravity, the Universe can and will create itself from nothing. Spontaneous creation is the reason there is something rather than nothing, why the Universe exists, why we exist.” Whether one believes Hawking or not is a matter of what one chooses to believe, but Hawking’s comment makes Cameron’s comment false.

As if Cameron has not already made a fool out of himself [for his hypocrisy of accusing Hawking of not having supernatural powers when he himself possesses none], he adds to his nutball-liness by admitting he has no clue what John Lennon’s song Imagine means.

Cameron states, “[Hawking] says he knows there is no Heaven. John Lennon wasn't sure. He said to pretend there's no Heaven. That's easy if you try. Then he said he hoped that someday we would join him.” Lennon never said he wasn’t sure there was a heaven. I’m quite sure that Lennon probably didn’t care if there is one. The message of Imagine is one of complete unity, in which the only qualification is to be a member of the human race.

The message of Imagine is actually a better message than the Bible. It is a complete non-exclusionary message. Christianity, as with all other religions, excludes people for a plethora of reasons: If you are not a follower of that particular religion, if you don’t believe in the facets of that religion, if you break the rules, if you don’t go to church, if you don’t pray, if you are not baptized, etc…the list goes on and on. Religion says “If you do not follow these rules or believe the teachings of this particular religion”, you are excluded. The song Imagine includes everyone…every member of the human race. This is why the lyrics state, “Imagine there’s no heaven”, “Imagine there’s no countries”, “Imagine no possessions”, “Imagine…no religion too”.

Lennon is not saying these particular things are necessarily bad in and of themselves, he’s saying that these things divide people. He is saying it does not matter who you are to be included in complete unity. It matters not if you are from a certain country, or if you are rich or poor or what religion you are part of. Economic status, citizenship and religion divide and put people into different classes. Perhaps Lennon is also suggesting that these things: Religion, citizenship/nationality and economic status are also some of the main causes for wars and misery in the world, so obviously, these things generally do not unite people.

Lennon’s message is far more beautiful in that he is saying, “The only class there should be is…human”. What a profound and powerful message that is. One in which nutballs like Kirk Cameron fail to grasp.

To Cameron, as well as with most religious people, if you do not believe in HIS religion and you do not think the exact same way he does, you are not a person and not worthy of his time.

It is ironic that Cameron criticizes John Lennon when Lennon’s message is more powerful and more loving than the one Cameron professes.

Wednesday, May 18, 2011

The Federal Reserve Board Is Monitoring Real Truth Online

by Larry Simons
May 18, 2011

I have the proof. I'm glad government criminals in Washington D.C. are monitoring my blog. I hope they learn something. Here is the proof The Fed is peeking at RTO.

[click to enlarge]

God knows why they viewed my story on Luke Rudkowski. They should have been looking at these I hope you criminals in Washington realize how much you have destroyed this country by completely ignoring our founders' warnings about the dangers of central banks. You all are lying, manipulative criminals who belong behind bars for the rest of your lives.

Saturday, May 14, 2011

Ron Paul Officially Announces 2012 Presidential Run

by Larry Simons
May 14, 2011

Speaking with George Stephanopoulos on Good Morning America yesterday, Texas Congressman Ron Paul officially announces running for President in 2012.

I personally loved the part when Stephanopoulos asks Paul why he is not running as an Independent, and Ron Paul replies, "It's impossible unless you're a billionaire like Ross Perot", then says, "You wouldn't be having me on your show if I was an Independent".

So true, so true.

Wednesday, May 11, 2011

Man In White House Released Video Is Not Osama. The Ears Don’t Lie

In the recently released White House video, not only is the mysterious gray-bearded man's ear a different shape than old pictures of Bin Laden, but they are in a different location on the side of his head

by Larry Simons
May 11, 2011

If anyone had any doubts whether or not the gray-bearded man watching TV in the recently released White House video is really Osama bin Laden, those doubts can be converted to certainty that it is NOT Bin Laden.

There have been discussions by people online claiming that Osama’s left ear in the video is a different shape than that of older, widely known pictures of him. The picture below shows the comparison between the two.

Obviously, as one can see, the ear of the man in the video still slopes downward and is more rounded while the ear in older photos of Bin Laden is more pointed. I found this to be interesting but it is not as strong of a smoking gun [that the man in the video is not Bin Laden] as something I recently discovered.

As one can plainly see, the top of the left ear of the man in the video is clearly, without a doubt, lower than his entire eyeball. It is not even debatable. As you can see in the video still [below] the man is holding his head near straight with only a slight upward angle. He appears to be holding his head slightly upward because he is looking at a TV. The top of his left ear is clearly underneath his entire eye socket.

In the pictures below, which are all well known and widely circulated pictures [none of which are doctored], one can clearly see that the tips of Bin Laden’s ears are located anywhere from [at least] the middle of his eye socket to rising above hie eye. See for yourself.

In the picture below, notice the red line I inserted indicating the tip of the man’s ear. It completely clears the left eye socket. [click all pics to enlarge]

In the pictures below, does it really look like if you inserted a red line across the tip of Bin Laden’s ear, it would clear the bottom of his eye sockets?

Here is another video still of the man the White House claims to be Osama bin Laden. Again, the left ear is just under his eye socket. The pictures above indicate differently.

Does the location of one’s ears change location as they get older? I have never known this to be true. I have seen pictures of my father and other family members over longer periods of time, and the locations of their ears never changed. Stands to reason, if the tip of Osama’s left ear is above his eyeball in 1998 [or any other year], then the tip of his left ear should still be above his eye in 2011.

It is absolutely irrefutable that the gray-bearded man in the video is NOT Osama bin Laden. Since this is obviously undeniable, it must be assumed that Obama and other high-level officials in Washington are involved in a conspiracy to dupe the American people into thinking the man who was gunned down on May 1 is in fact Osama bin Laden when it clearly is not him.

Since this is the case, one has to ask: What is the REAL agenda of those who would have us believe that Bin Laden was just killed 10 days ago?

Saturday, May 7, 2011

Bill Maher: Conspiracy Theorists Don't Think Bin Laden Carried Out 9/11. [Because the FBI Said He Didn't]

During “New Rules” segment, Maher insults 9/11 truthers by claiming it was them in whom the “Bin Laden never carried out 9/11” claim originated. In reality, truthers were just repeating what the FBI has claimed for 10 years: That on Bin Laden’s FBI profile, 9/11 was never listed among his crimes because there was insufficient evidence

by Larry Simons
May 7, 2011

On Friday’s episode of Real Time with Bill Maher, during his “New Rules” segment, Maher attacked 9/11 truthers with an all too common false claim that it was truthers who invented the claim that Osama bin Laden never carried out the 9/11 attacks. If Maher cared more about facts than his sad attempt to equate 9/11 truthers with crazy, paranoid tin foil hat-wearing people who believe it was really Bigfoot and aliens that killed JFK, he would have explained to his audience that the belief that Bin Laden never carried out 9/11 did not originate with 9/11 truthers, but from the FBI.

Rex Tomb, of the FBI’s public affairs office, stated in 2006, “The reason why 9/11 is not mentioned on Osama Bin Laden's Most Wanted page is because the FBI has no hard evidence connecting Bin Laden to 9/11.” [Emphasis added] It is a fact that 9/11 has never been mentioned on Bin Laden’s FBI profile. Here is a screen shot of his FBI profile I captured just days ago. It has never mentioned 9/11.

In a close-up of the same screen shot [below], you can see under Bin Laden's crimes, it states:

"Usama bin Laden is wanted in connection with the August 7, 1998, bombings of the United States embassies in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania, and Nairobi, Kenya. These attacks killed over 200 people. In addition, Bin Laden is a suspect in other terrorist attacks throughout the world."

You would think if there was evidence that Bin Laden killed over 3,000 people on 9/11, the FBI would not hesitate to include a larger number than 200 deaths. But, as you can see, 9/11 is nowhere to be found on his FBI profile, and Bill Maher wants his brain dead audience to believe that fact was created out of thin air by 9/11 truthers.

Of course, this does not stop Bill Maher from blatantly lying on national TV. In fact, Maher began the rant by stating another deception, that “conspiracy theorists […] are claiming that we didn’t really kill Bin Laden…”. In fact, most conspiracy theorists actually believe Bin Laden died as far back as 2001. For Maher to insinuate that conspiracy theorists “don’t think we killed Bin Laden” is an attempt to make them look kooky by stating a half-truth. Most conspiracy theorists believe that Osama has long been dead, and was not killed just days ago. They wouldn’t be the only ones. See here.

Here is the entirety to Maher’s lying rant on truthers Friday night: [watch segment here]

“Conspiracy theorists who are claiming that we didn’t really kill Bin Laden must be reminded that they didn’t think he did the crime in the first place. Come on nutjobs, keep your bullshit straight. The towers were brought down in a controlled demolition by George W. Bush to distract attention from Hawaii where CIA operatives were planting phony birth records so that a Kenyan named Obama could someday rise to power and pretend to take out the guy we pretended took out the towers. And I…and I know that’s true because I just got it in an email from Trump.”

It all boils down to the old, tiresome fact that people like Bill Maher, who are required to toe the line on official stories [because their jobs, reputations are careers are at stake], have no choice but to lie, distort the truth and ridicule those who search for the facts and ask hard questions because those facts do not coincide with their pre-conceived ideologies.

Maher was fired from his last job on Politically Incorrect by ABC in 2002 because of controversial comments regarding 9/11. Maher said on the show following 9/11, “We have been the cowards, lobbing cruise missiles from 2,000 miles away. That's cowardly. Staying in the airplane when it hits the building, say what you want about it, it's not cowardly”.

He is not about to open that can of worms again and get the boot a second time. This is why he never talks about 9/11 unless it is within the context of the official government conspiracy theory or an ad hominem attack rant against 9/11 truthers.

That is the definition of a coward.

Thursday, May 5, 2011

Good Lord Almighty, Andy Ostroy Has COMPLETELY Lost His Mind!

He not only believes Bin Laden was just killed days ago, but that his death means something to America!

by Larry Simons
May 5, 2011

I am just going to be blunt about Andy Ostroy’s latest article, “9 Years, 234 Days Later: What bin Laden's Death Means to America [May 3]”, because it is the most ridiculous, lie-infested, litany of utter crapola I have ever read. This article might just win top prize among his other bullshit articles of the past, and let me tell ya….that takes a lot, and I mean A LOT of doing!

The best way I can address Ostroy’s latest composition of shit is to just post it portion by portion and then insert my reaction [in purple text in parenthesis]. I will begin by addressing where the first catastrophic lie is located….his title, “….what bin Laden’s death means to America”.

[If anyone has at least two brain cells in their head, they would conclude that Bin Laden’s death means absolutely nothing to America. This includes all of our top leaders, including President Obama, because Osama’s death means that we should get the fuck out of Afghanistan. But, naturally, you will not see this happen. In fact, I will make the prediction right here, right now, that his death will only be used to prolong war. Top military officials, as well as leaders in Washington will no doubt be planting seeds soon that Bin Laden’s “death” will be avenged with new threats and possibly new 9/11-style terror attacks. This is why “more war will be needed”]

Ostroy begins:

“Make no mistake: the death of al Qaeda leader Osama bin Laden, mastermind of the 9/11 terrorist attacks, is a monumental military and psychological victory for our great nation and for all Americans.”

[First of all, as I have stated numerous times, Bin Laden was never even indicted for 9-11, nor was charged with the crime. The FBI admitted they did not have sufficient proof he was the “mastermind” behind 9/11. I have posted Bin Laden’s FBI profile numerous times in the past few days showing this. But if Ostroy wants to lie and call Bin Laden the “mastermind” behind 9/11, he can if it makes him feel better. A “monumental military and psychological victory for our great nation and for all Americans”? Really Andy? It would only be a “monumental” victory if Bin Laden really did carry out 9/11. The FBI [as I have said] said there was not enough proof to charge Bin Laden with 9/11. So, how can it be monumental to kill someone in whom there was no proof that individual carried out an attack on our country? For “all” Americans? You can be the spokesman for all dumbed-down Americans who love fake patriotism, Ostroy, but do not speak for me.]

“It marks the end of the biggest criminal manhunt in history, presents us with an opportunity for unity, and to experience some sense of satisfaction as we continue to mourn the loss of 3000 victims and heal the still-open wounds.”

[The manhunt is over, huh? So, we can leave Afghanistan then Andy? What connection is there between “satisfaction” over Bin Laden’s death and us mourning 3,000 victims if we have no proof Bin Laden murdered 3,000 victims? Pure insanity.]

“news began to spread late Sunday evening that a Unites States mission led by Navy Seals killed bin Laden at his $1-million fortress/mansion in a suburb just 35 miles outside of Pakistan's capital…”

[Actually it is worth about $250,000, but don’t let the facts get in the way Andy. Also people living nearby/neighbors never heard one peep about Bin Laden living there. This guy doesn't even believe it.]

“…(quite contrary to the belief these past ten years that he'd been desperately living like a hunted animal in a remote cave).”

[Actually the belief has been that he’s been dead these past 10 years]

“Hundreds of people, largely college students and young people, immediately descended upon the White House, Times Square, Ground Zero and other locations throughout the country.”


“While they rallied and cheered in jubilant celebration of the death of this monster, others have decried such revelry and likened it to the shameful dancing and glee that took place on the streets in Middle Eastern countries following the attacks ten years ago.

It's hard to make comparisons between then and now, as the deaths that were celebrated back in September 2001 were of innocent people, while bin Laden was a mass murderer who deserved to die.”

[Yes, they were innocent, but keep in mind, our own FBI never indicted Bin Laden for 9/11 and 9/11 was not listed under his crimes on his FBI profile. A person should only be deemed “a mass murderer” if they have been tried and convicted through our legal system. Even a confession is not considered evidence, because as we all know, someone could “claim” they carried out a crime even if they didn’t simply because they want to take credit for something they wish they had done. Also, here’s a thought to ponder: Since 2002, the United States has slaughtered well over a million Afghan and Iraqi civilians in two illegal and unconstitutional wars, meaning they were innocent as well. So, that being true, can we not equate Americans who support these wars and rally them on with the Middle Eastern citizens who danced with glee over the deaths of the 3,000 killed on 9/11?]

“Additionally, it's unfair to judge anyone under these trying circumstances. Those who've lost loved ones to violence view life, and death, through a much different lens. It's easy to understand how victims of deadly crimes could desire vengeance and vindication. It's easy to understand their celebration over the death of those who kill. It's the biblical "eye for an eye." That other Americans who have indirectly been affected by the 9/11 attacks also joyously celebrate bin Laden's death is understandable as well.”

[Yes, but the United States is supposed to be civilized and try these people through the court of law. The wars are illegal and unconstitutional. That means we are not supposed to be there in the first place. That also means we are not supposed to shoot people dead unless they are engaged in a shoot-out with us. In other words: We kill out of self-defense, not just burst into compounds and shoot people dead. It has been reported that the “supposed” Bin Laden was captured alive and then executed, (and unarmed). So, why did we need to shoot him? He was never charged with carrying out 9/11. Oh, and Andy, the “eye for an eye” thing was outdated when Jesus came along. Did you miss too much Sunday school Andy?]

“To be sure, bin Laden and his actions forever changed the U.S landscape in so many ways. His impact can be felt in virtually every aspect of American life, from politics and finance to travel and homeland security.”

[Well, being a CIA operative with code name Tim Osman can have an effect on the American landscape. His “impact”? You mean, the impact that our government allowed him to have? Who do you think gave Bin Laden and his crew the guns they used to fight the Russians? They sure didn’t get the guns at their local Islamabad K-Mart, Andy. Those guns came courtesy of the good ol’ USA! At the risk of sounding Kerry-esque, Bin Laden was our friend before he was our enemy.]

“Since the 9/11 attacks, we've been forced to live in fear when we fly, board a train, stand in the subways. That the architect of this terror had half his face blown off is justice served to many.”

[Oh, you mean the guy that the FBI had insufficient evidence against for carrying out the 9/11 attacks?]

“Like Hitler during the 1930's and 40's, bin Laden was responsible for mass death and atrocities, and was our #1 enemy.”

[And just like Hitler, Bin Laden was supported by the United States government. Being on the CIA’s payroll is most definitely considered support.]

“It's ok to cheer and celebrate his death. We killed our enemy before he could kill us.”

[According to you Andy, he did kill us first…on 9/11 remember? How soon we forget!]

“The joy is more like a collective sigh of relief that maybe this reign of terror, if not over, will abate somewhat.”

[He’s been dead for 10 years Andy. What “reign of terror” are you talking about George W. Bush? Er…I mean, Andy?]

“And if our great nation, which has been royally kicked in the ass since the 9/11 attacks--made worse by the worst financial crisis in over 80 years--has a brief opportunity to feel victorious and proud, what's wrong with that?”

[And Obama has helped this nation get “kicked in the ass” more…with more war, more death, more added to our national debt, increased unemployment, more troops sent to Afghanistan and Iraq, and now a THIRD war in Libya. Not to mention Obama’s bailing out of banks and doing nothing to CEO’s who give themselves 4 million-dollar bonuses.]

“But it's also completely understandable to view such revelry as uncouth and un-American. Celebrating the death of anyone is not supposed to be something which causes elation and high-fives. We are supposed to be above that. Civility and the rule of law is what really makes America great.”

[Funny, you just said “It’s OK to cheer and celebrate his death”]

“But things are very complicated in the post 9/11 world. Grief comes in many different flavors, and everyone experiences it differently. So we must understand and accept the myriad reactions to bin Laden's death without judgement”

[Even if the reactions come from uninformed, idiotic people who care more about their favorite TV shows being canceled than learning facts about how evil and corrupt our own government is? Even if these people have no clue how much their own government lies to them? You’re one of those people Andy. Sorry Andy, I can’t give you, or them, a free pass on stupidity.]

“…and at least agree that America and the world is a better place without him.”

[Want to back that up with proof?]

I admit, I have not written much about Ostroy lately, but this garbage sure does make up for my lack of mention of him. It frightens me that someone like Ostroy, who comes across as someone who should possess more intelligence than he does, is capable of such profound blind allegiance to this country and stupidity, that he fails miserably at putting forth any effort to learn facts. Not to mention also, for writing such atrocious articles like this.

I have no clue how Ostroy can top this insane and misguided article. But, I am sure he can. I have faith in him..

Wednesday, May 4, 2011

Top US Government Insider: Bin Laden Died In 2001, 9/11 A False Flag

Former Deputy Assistant Secretary of State under three different administrations Steve R. Pieczenik says he is prepared to tell a federal grand jury the name of a top general who told him directly 9/11 was a false flag attack

Paul Joseph Watson
May 4, 2011

Top US government insider Dr. Steve R. Pieczenik, a man who held numerous different influential positions under three different Presidents and still works with the Defense Department, shockingly told The Alex Jones Show yesterday that Osama Bin Laden died in 2001 and that he was prepared to testify in front of a grand jury how a top general told him directly that 9/11 was a false flag inside job.

Pieczenik cannot be dismissed as a “conspiracy theorist”
. He served as the Deputy Assistant Secretary of State under three different administrations, Nixon, Ford and Carter, while also working under Reagan and Bush senior, and still works as a consultant for the Department of Defense. A former US Navy Captain, Pieczenik achieved two prestigious Harry C. Solomon Awards at the Harvard Medical School as he simultaneously completed a PhD at MIT.

Recruited by Lawrence Eagleburger as Deputy Assistant Secretary of State for Management, Pieczenik went on to develop, “the basic tenets for psychological warfare, counter terrorism, strategy and tactics for transcultural negotiations for the US State Department, military and intelligence communities and other agencies of the US Government,” while also developing foundational strategies for hostage rescue that were later employed around the world.

Pieczenik also served as a senior policy planner under Secretaries Henry Kissinger, Cyrus Vance, George Schultz and James Baker and worked on George W. Bush’s election campaign against Al Gore. His record underscores the fact that he is one of the most deeply connected men in intelligence circles over the past three decades plus.

The character of Jack Ryan, who appears in many Tom Clancy novels and was also played by Harrison Ford in the popular 1992 movie Patriot Games, is also based on Steve Pieczenik.

Back in April 2002, over nine years ago, Pieczenik told the Alex Jones Show that Bin Laden had already been “dead for months,” and that the government was waiting for the most politically expedient time to roll out his corpse. Pieczenik would be in a position to know, having personally met Bin Laden and worked with him during the proxy war against the Soviets in Afghanistan back in the early 80′s.

Pieczenik said that Osama Bin Laden died in 2001, “Not because special forces had killed him, but because as a physician I had known that the CIA physicians had treated him and it was on the intelligence roster that he had marfan syndrome,” adding that the US government knew Bin Laden was dead before they invaded Afghanistan.

Marfan syndrome is a degenerative genetic disease for which there is no permanent cure. The illness severely shortens the life span of the sufferer.

“He died of marfan syndrome, Bush junior knew about it, the intelligence community knew about it,” said Pieczenik, noting how CIA physicians had visited Bin Laden in July 2001 at the American Hospital in Dubai.

“He was already very sick from marfan syndrome and he was already dying, so nobody had to kill him,” added Pieczenik, stating that Bin Laden died shortly after 9/11 in his Tora Bora cave complex.

“Did the intelligence community or the CIA doctor up this situation, the answer is yes, categorically yes,” said Pieczenik, referring to Sunday’s claim that Bin Laden was killed at his compound in Pakistan, adding, “This whole scenario where you see a bunch of people sitting there looking at a screen and they look as if they’re intense, that’s nonsense,” referring to the images released by the White House which claim to show Biden, Obama and Hillary Clinton watching the operation to kill Bin Laden live on a television screen. [below]

“It’s a total make-up, make believe, we’re in an American theater of the absurd….why are we doing this again….nine years ago this man was already dead….why does the government repeatedly have to lie to the American people,” asked Pieczenik.

“Osama Bin Laden was totally dead, so there’s no way they could have attacked or confronted or killed Osama Bin laden,” said Pieczenik, joking that the only way it could have happened was if special forces had attacked a mortuary.

Pieczenik said that the decision to launch the hoax now was made because Obama had reached a low with plummeting approval ratings and the fact that the birther issue was blowing up in his face.

“He had to prove that he was more than American….he had to be aggressive,” said Pieczenik, adding that the farce was also a way of isolating Pakistan as a retaliation for intense opposition to the Predator drone program, which has killed hundreds of Pakistanis.

“This is orchestrated, I mean when you have people sitting around and watching a sitcom, basically the operations center of the White House, and you have a president coming out almost zombie-like telling you they just killed Osama Bin Laden who was already dead nine years ago,” said Pieczenik, calling the episode, “the greatest falsehood I’ve ever heard, I mean it was absurd.”

Dismissing the government’s account of the assassination of Bin Laden as a “sick joke” on the American people, Pieczenik said, “They are so desperate to make Obama viable, to negate the fact that he may not have been born here, any questions about his background, any irregularities about his background, to make him look assertive….to re-elect this president so the American public can be duped once again.”

Pieczenik’s assertion that Bin Laden died almost ten years ago is echoed by numerous intelligence professionals as well as heads of state across the world.

Bin Laden, “Was used in the same way that 9/11 was used to mobilize the emotions and feelings of the American people in order to go to a war that had to be justified through a narrative that Bush junior created and Cheney created about the world of terrorism,” stated Pieczenik.

During his interview with the Alex Jones Show yesterday, Pieczenik also asserted he was directly told by a prominent general that 9/11 was a stand down and a false flag operation, and that he is prepared to go to a grand jury to reveal the general’s name.

“They ran the attacks,” said Pieczenik, naming Dick Cheney, Paul Wolfowitz, Stephen Hadley, Elliott Abrams, and Condoleezza Rice amongst others as having been directly involved.

“It was called a stand down, a false flag operation in order to mobilize the American public under false pretenses….it was told to me even by the general on the staff of Wolfowitz – I will go in front of a federal committee and swear on perjury who the name was of the individual so that we can break it open,” said Pieczenik, adding that he was “furious” and “knew it had happened”.

“I taught stand down and false flag operations at the national war college, I’ve taught it with all my operatives so I knew exactly what was done to the American public,” he added.

Pieczenik re-iterated that he was perfectly willing to reveal the name of the general who told him 9/11 was an inside job in a federal court, “so that we can unravel this thing legally, not with the stupid 9/11 Commission that was absurd.”

Pieczenik explained that he was not a liberal, a conservative or a tea party member, merely an American who is deeply concerned about the direction in which his country is heading.

Watch the full interview with Dr. Pieczenik below

Tuesday, May 3, 2011

When Will the American People Demand Proof Osama Is Dead Like They Demand Proof from 9/11 Truthers?

If you ask for proof of Osama’s body, you are an un-American “conspiracy theorist” for not bowing down and accepting another government official story from a government that never EVER lies to you

by Larry Simons
May 3, 2011

I find it on one hand hilarious, and on the other insulting, that in the wake of the news that “Osama is dead” Americans have broken into jubilant celebration in certain areas of the country [ground zero, Washington, etc..] while not demanding [or even asking] for one shred of evidence that it is even true Osama is dead.

Yet, when politicians, the media or everyday American citizens ridicule and condemn 9/11 truthers for their questions about 9/11, their sole reason for doing so [it seems] is their “lack of proof” of their “theories”.

It all boils down to the fact that when the masses want to believe something so badly [especially if the “facts” are coming from a “so-called” “trusted” source like our government/the military] proof is not required. Likewise, when the masses do not want to believe something so badly [like the fact that our own government just might be involved in the worst terror attack in this country’s history], they tend to ignore and dismiss glaring contradictions and anomalies, which should not exist if they have been given all the facts.

Ironically, it is the very same government that has continually lied to the American people about everything under the sun [WMD’s, whether torture is conducted on prisoners, Iraq/9-11 connections, Iran possessing nukes, false flag terror, Saddam/9-11 connection, JFK assassination, 9/11 itself, Gulf of Tonkin, global warming….the list goes on and on] that suddenly multitudes of Americans fully trust now with the news that Bin Laden is dead.

Why? Because it is something they want to believe. When 9/11 truthers ask hard-hitting questions about the endless list of lies and contradictions that surround 9/11, demand for proof is the first words on people’s lips, even if truthers are just asking questions.

Once again, it has been proven that simply asking questions in this country is deemed unpatriotic and anti-American. If we dare question our government, we are traitors that deserve to be shipped out of the country to live among our fellow communists abroad. Just asking for proof that Osama is really dead [by requesting to see pictures of his body] will prompt the same contemptuous reaction from people as when truthers asked [and still do] to see the 80+ surveillance cameras that supposedly captured what really hit the Pentagon on 9/11.

You will be branded an un-American scumbag if you demand proof Osama is dead. You are not to question a government that has a long track record of continually lying to the American people. If you demand to see his corpse, you are now a “conspiracy theorist” for just asking that question, in the same manner that you are an un-American, piece of shit “conspiracy theorist” if you simply ask where the government obtained DNA of the hijackers [prior to the hijackings] they supposedly matched it with from the DNA supposedly collected in the ruins of the World Trade Center.

It does not matter if high-ranking officials from the FBI and CIA have declared Osama dead on numerous occasions in the past. What matters is, the government is telling you now that Osama bin Laden is dead, so it MUST be true. Accept it. Do not question it. Fall in line and move on.

Has the government ever let you down before?

To be clear, conspiracy theorists have never claimed that Bin Laden is still alive. The White House has recently announced that a picture of the dead Bin Laden will be released soon and the corporate media will no doubt claim this puts to bed theories that Bin Laden is still alive.

Conspiracy theorists have claimed Bin Laden has already been dead for years, based on numerous reports from high-ranking officials that he had already been killed. The most recent was former Pakistani Prime Minister Benazir Bhutto who told David Frost in November 2007 that Bin Laden was killed by Omar Shiekh. Watch the clip here. She says it at the 2:14 mark in the video. Bhutto was assassinated a month later.

A release of the picture [even if genuine] will not prove when Bin Laden was killed. The irony here is, the American people will see the picture, ask no questions and continue their moronic celebrations, as if the government has been a bastion of truth in the past, when in fact it was an agency of that same government [the FBI] who for years claimed it had no evidence that Osama bin Laden carried out 9/11. Shortly after the announced "death" of Bin Laden, I captured this screen shot of Bin Laden's FBI profile [which had not mentioned 9/11 for years] that still omitted 9/11 from his list of crimes.

Our own FBI has admitted that it never had enough evidence that Bin Laden carried out 9/11, but you would not know that from listening to politicians or watching the news. It is that same government who never even indicted Bin Laden for 9/11 that we are now supposed to magically believe has assassinated him just days ago. Make no mistake, Bin Laden is dead, but it did not just happen.

Monday, May 2, 2011

Bin Laden Declared Dead. Simply Hilarious.

If You Thought Liberals Treated Obama Like He Was Jesus Christ
Before...Watch What They Will Do Now!

by Larry Simons
May 2, 2011

With Obama's approval ratings nearing their all time low of 41% [currently 43%], gas prices nearing all time record highs, three unconstitutional wars being fought and Obama's birth certificate being discovered as a photo-shopped fake, there was not a more convenient time to announce the death of Bin Laden to revive Obama's plummeting approval ratings just in time for the kickoff of Obama's re-election campaign.

No doubt the American press and the rest of brain dead America will think this is a story [even if true], because it will not change one fucking thing. Wars will still continue. Unemployment will still increase. Gas prices will keep climbing. American troops will continue to die.

No doubt, this will be on the news non-stop for the next two months, obscuring every real, legitimate issue that really matters to Americans. The media [and moronic Americans] will eat this up like a latest Lindsay Lohan story and pretend that Bin Laden's death [if legitimate] means anything.

Will we see a picture of Bin Laden's body? How will we know it is recent if we do? Why does it matter that Bin Laden is dead anyway? According to the FBI, he was not involved in the September 11 attacks by their own admittance. As of this writing, he is not declared dead on their website and the profile still says nothing about 9-11. Here is the screen shot I just captured.

Until I see a photo of Bin Laden's dead body laying next to someone who can be verified that they are currently active in the military, Hillary Clinton or Obama himself, this story will be filed under "Bullshit stories that are meant to stir up the emotions of Americans, but really don't mean shit".

It will be fun watching Americans and the media over the next few weeks accepting this story without question like it's the Bible or global warming. It will be equally as fun watching liberals acting as if Obama just died on the cross for our sins.