Wednesday, October 27, 2010
EXCLUSIVE: Uncovered 9/11 Footage Shows FBI Director Asking Firefighters About “Secondary Hits” On WTC
Amazing video also shows city officials hurriedly leaving after South Tower collapse
October 27, 2010
An intriguing video has appeared on You Tube that appears to show a FDNY film crew being interviewed in the aftermath of the 9/11 attacks by the the director of the FBI’s New York office, who has suspicions that one of the World Trade Center towers took a “secondary hit” before collapsing.
The video appears to be part of NIST’s recent FOIA releases and therefore has not been seen before now.
On first viewing it appears to be nothing special, just the horribly familiar scenes of dust and rubble from the aftermath of the attacks. However, it contains a stunning exchange between officials and firefighters.
The action appears to be taking place immediately after the collapse of the South tower and before the collapse of the North tower.
The film crew exits a building and make their way along the dust and debris littered streets.
At around 2 mins 50, a man in a suit approaches the crew and announces himself as “FBI, Barry Mawn.”
Mawn (pictured below with Rudy Giuliani) was at that time the director of the FBI’s New York office.
Mawn then asks the FDNY crew a question in the form of a statement – “That tower got a secondary hit?”
The firefighters respond by saying they are unsure but they heard a rumbling and ran for their lives as the tower then collapsed.
The audio is difficult to hear but one of the firefighters then says he “saw it blow right out the side of the building” to which Mawn asks “that was the plane right?”.
The firefighter then states “I don’t know if it was a plane or an explosion.”
As they continue their description of events the noise of a jet overhead interrupts them as people begin to panic. Someone, presumably another FBI agent shouts “is that ours?” to which Mawn replies “yeah that should be ours”.
At this point a large gathering of suited individuals walks into view and a woman in the group yells “go to city hall.”
Mawn then asks “where is the mayor?”, from which it can be deduced that this group is affiliated with Rudy Giuliani and they are hurriedly leaving the scene.
The woman leading the mayor’s group then curses at reporters telling them to “get the f*** out of here”.
One commenter has speculated that the reporters are with Pat Dawson, the first NBC News correspondent to report from the scene of the attacks at the World Trade Center.
Watch the video.
We have previously covered the fact that Giuliani and his group were warned that the South tower was about to collapse, before it happened. This video of them leaving the scene just after the collapse of the South tower dovetails directly with that information – another huge finding to emerge from the NIST video releases.
The video is a fascinating piece of evidence to be added to the hundreds of other accounts and descriptions of secondary explosions in and around the WTC on 9/11. This clearly indicates that the FBI believed that a secondary attack, aside from the use of air planes was under way.
Indeed, this backs up previous evidence that the FBI’s initial working premise was that trucks packed with explosives aided the collapse of the twin towers. This fact was reported by USA today journalist Jack Kelly:
The details were also covered by MSNBC’s Rick Sanchez, who also reported that officials strongly believed a van packed with explosives parked underneath the towers had contributed to their collapse.
Barry Mawn has other intriguing connections to the events of 9/11. He was a close friend and associate of John O’ Neil, the former deputy director for the FBI who quit his job out of frustration that his investigations into Al Qaeda terrorist plots were being blocked. O’Neil became head of security for the World Trade Center on September 11th 2001. His body was discovered in the rubble after the attacks after he had helped people escape the towers before they collapsed.
Mawn was also the individual who explained to the media how police and the FBI found the passport of one of the alleged hijackers, Satam Al Suqami, in the rubble during a “grid search” of the area close to the World Trade Center.
Mawn was later involved in the investigation of the Anthrax attacks, which he initially believed originated from US military sources. Mawn resigned from the FBI in March 2002 following the break down of this investigation.
The information revealed in this short piece of footage once again goes to show that there is still masses of evidence regarding the 9/11 attack that we are yet to discover. It should encourage 9/11 researchers to continue to dig deeper and demand a new independent investigation.
Media Matters and Think Progress – owned by group committed to "promoting the policies of Barack Obama," completely fail to mention that Rand Paul supporter was also victim of assault
Paul Joseph Watson
October 26, 2010
The establishment media and the George Soros-funded White House press whores Media Matters and Think Progress are raging about how a Rand Paul supporter stomped on a female MoveOn activist following last night’s Paul-Conway debate in Lexington, while covering up the fact that a female Rand Paul activist was also the victim of a stomping metered out by a Conway supporter just moments before.
An Associated Press video of the incident seems to go to great lengths to slow down the stomping in order to increase shock value, while conveniently failing to capture on film an almost identical incident moments before where a female Rand Paul supporter had her bandaged foot sliced open by a Conway fan who stomped her in a similar fashion.
Lauren Valle, a liberal MoveOn activist, attempted to create a confrontation by moving towards Paul after the debate, only to be restrained by Rand Paul fans. The video shows one of them push his foot down on the woman’s upper back in a stomping motion. Other Rand Paul activists try to discourage the man from hurting the woman.
The Rand Paul supporter who assaulted the woman is clearly a thug and should be criminally charged, but the establishment media and the George Soros-funded blogs have hastily exploited this unfortunate incident in an effort to prop up the flailing political campaign of Democrat Jack Conway, by attempting to demonize Rand Paul supporters as a mob of angry brownshirts.
For some reason, they don’t seem as keen to report on allegations of criminal money being behind the Conway campaign, a far bigger scandal, neither have they bothered to highlight an almost identical situation which occurred last night where a Conway supporter stomped on a Rand Paul activist before the Rand Paul supporter did the same to Valle.
As the leftist blogs rage about the actions of the Rand Paul supporter, the Kentucky Post was one of barely a handful of publications to acknowledge that a Conway supporter assaulted a Rand Paul fan in precisely the same manner.
"The second occurred after a Conway supporter stepped on the foot of a female Rand supporter, who recently had foot surgery, according to police," states the report.
"The woman was wearing a surgical boot, but after the injury, her incision was cut open. Police say she refused medical treatment and also filed an assault report."
Think Progress, the website bankrolled by the Center for American Progress Action Fund, a think tank headed by Bill Clinton’s former chief of staff John D. Podesta, who was also head of Barack Obama’s presidential transition team after the 2008 election, failed to mention that a Rand Paul activist was also stomped on by a Conway fan last night.
It’s unsurprising that Think Progress would run a cover-up for Democrat establishment candidate Conway, given the fact that Center for American Progress director Jennifer Palmieri admits that the goal of the organization is focused around "driving the White House’s message and agenda."
Neither does it come as a shock that Media Matters, who recently received a $1 million contribution from billionaire globalist Soros, would also fail to mention the Conway supporter’s stomp in the course of their coverage of the story. Media Matters is tied at the hip with Think Progress as part of Podesta’s Progressive Media propaganda campaign, described as a "war room for promoting the foreign and domestic policies of Barack Obama." Podesta also helped found Media Matters.
While being owned by organizations whose goal it is to ‘promote the policies of Barack Obama’ and ‘drive the White House’s message and agenda’, both Think Progress and Media Matters ludicrously claim to be "non-partisan," which is like suggesting that Karl Rove is non-partisan towards the Republican Party.
Media Matters and Think Progress are transparently nothing more than press whores for the Obama White House. That’s why their baseless smears against Alex Jones and others are written by anonymous cowards who refuse to even put their name to their stories.
After months of endless contrived smears against Rand Paul that failed miserably, leftist Obamanoids were probably licking their lips when the "stomping" story emerged this morning. But now it has emerged that a Rand Paul supporter was the victim of an identical stomping, the scandal has blown up in their face.
Lefitist publications like the Huffington Post, Media Matters and Think Progress have once again been exposed in their pathetic attempts to manufacture fake controversies to score political propaganda points, just as liberals were left red-faced after a Conway supporter attempted to pose as a racist Rand Paul fan in an underhanded and pathetic ploy to discredit the Kentucky Senatorial candidate.
The Conway incident was by no means the only example of Obamanoid thugs attacking Tea Party activists for daring to go against the Democrat borg. Indeed, there have been innumerable cases of leftists viciously assaulting conservatives, most of which have been caught on video, but the establishment media just isn’t interested.
That’s because you can’t sell a fearmongering campaign about the rise of the angry right and how critics of Obama are racist extremists intent on violence when the only racist extremists carrying out violence are all leftist Obama supporters.
Earlier this year, A group of local citizens in North Carolina protesting the Financial Reform bill and the Durbin BP Bailout amendment were approached by a man who disagreed with them that Obama was to blame.
After the small gathering of protesters chanted "no more bailouts," the man began to argue with the group about who was to blame for the financial collapse.
The man then appears to push away another man holding a video camera before putting his hands on the other man’s wife.
"Hey don’t touch my wife, you got it?," says the cameraman as the clip cuts to another video camera from a different angle which shows the pro-Obama thug wrestling with and then slamming the cameraman with a vicious punch to the face.
When the pro-Obama thug is asked to remain at the scene because the police want to talk to him, he states, "you get your camera, you shove it up your ass". He then threatens the cameraman with violence again saying, "If you don’t fuck around, you’ll get hurt". The man is subsequently seen standing near a police car but it is unclear whether any action was taken.
Watch the clip.
Over the course of the past year, we have documented numerous instances of pro-Obama thugs committing violence against Tea Party activists or anti-bailout protesters. While the establishment media constantly invokes violence in its demonization of anti-Obama protesters, there has barely been a single tangible example of this, indeed, last night’s stomping incident was the first, and yet anti-Obama thugs commit violence on a routine basis safe in the knowledge that the corporate media will never report on it.
During an August 2009 demonstration in Mehville, Missouri, Obamacare opponents were locked out of a town hall meeting before Union thugs viciously attacked patriot and Tea Party activist Kenneth Gladney, who was handing out Gadsden flags outside the stage-managed event, while hurling racist insults. According to MSNBC’s Chris Matthews. the Gadsden flag is part of the extremist paraphernalia of dangerous anti-Obama right-wingers, and yet it was Gladney who was attacked by pro-Obama thugs merely for handing them out.
"Kenneth was attacked on the evening of August 6, 2009 at Rep. Russ Carnahan’s town hall meeting in South St. Louis County," wrote Gladney’s attorney, David B. Brown, in an email sent to Infowars. "Kenneth was approached by an SEIU representative as Kenneth was handing out ‘Don’t Tread on Me’ flags to other conservatives. The SEIU representative demanded to know why a black man was handing out these flags.
The SEIU member used a racial slur against Kenneth, then punched him in the face. Kenneth fell to the ground. Another SEIU member yelled racial epithets at Kenneth as he kicked him in the head and back. Kenneth was also brutally attacked by one other male SEIU member and an unidentified woman. The three men were clearly SEIU members, as they were wearing T-shirts with the SEIU logo."
The video clip below shows the aftermath of the attack.
Brown characterized the attack on Gladney, who was hospitalized with multiple injuries, as "a truly senseless hate crime," (Gladney is black) but you wouldn’t have heard the Huffington Post, Media Matters, or Think Progress talking about it, because it wasn’t carried out by Tea Party members, it was an attack by pro-Obamacare thugs furious at people for using their free speech to express opinions which differed to their own.
Elston McCowan, 47, of St. Louis, and Perry Molens, 50, of De Soto, were each later charged with assaulting Gladney.
But it doesn’t end there – here’s another example of Tea Party members being attacked by extreme pro-Obama leftists.
During a November 2009 immigration enforcement rally, A.N.S.W.E.R.-hired thugs attacked 62-year-old Dave Caulkett of Floridians for Immigration Enforcement, pummeling him with their signs and kicking him in the face as other A.N.S.W.E.R. goons cheered.
Watch the clip below.
Before the event, A.N.S.W.E.R. Florida had sent out an email to their members calling for a "militant confrontation with the so-called "tea baggers."
"Beating back these forces will require us to organize together, take the streets, fight the racists wherever they show their faces and drive them out of every community," stated the email.
As this blog points out, "As can also be clearly seen on the video, A.N.S.W.E.R. organizers set their thugs loose on the two men and stood by until they heard police coming. Then they stopped their members and repositioned them to make it look like nothing happened. This was an orchestrated attack designed to make people fearful of protesting against their agenda."
Huffington Post, Media Matters, Think Progress and the rest of the Soros/White House mouthpieces need to think twice before attempting to generate contrived scandals about Rand Paul, because every time they launch another smear, it routinely backfires and only has the effect of increasing support for the Kentucky candidate.
Supporters of Paul’s campaign should welcome the efforts of the Soros borg media, because collectively they’ve been so vehemently discredited that being attacked by them is fast turning into some kind of badge of honor which denotes the trustworthiness and genuine threat posed to the establishment by genuine Tea Party candidates like Rand Paul.
Saturday, October 16, 2010
Billo-logic: If You’re A Foreign Terrorist, You Are Defined by Your Religion; If You’re A Domestic Terrorist, You’re Just A Terrorist
In Billo’s eyes, if you’re a brown person [Middle Eastern], your religion is evil. If you’re an American and you blow people to bits, you’re a lone nutball whose religion is still true, holy and just
by Larry Simons
October 16, 2010
Incase my readers thought I had joined the Bill O’ Reilly fan club since I have not written a story about him in quite awhile, relax. Loofah boy is back in the national spotlight because of his appearance on Thursday’s telecast of The View.
As Billo was plugging his stupid book, Pinheads and Patriots [that no doubt include great Americans among his “pinheads” and his “patriots” are firemen who rescue cats from trees and cops who rescue people trapped in their cars……pssst….they are just doing their jobs Billo!], he decided to bring up the controversial ground zero/mosque issue.
As Billo was battling his biggest adversaries on The View [Whoopi Goldberg and Joy Behar], he stated “70 percent of Americans don’t want that mosque down there”, to which Goldberg replied, “But why is that?” Billo replied, “Because it’s inappropriate”. Goldberg replied, “Why is it inappropriate….”, to which Billo hammered back, “Muslims killed us on 9/11”. After Goldberg shouted, “Nooo, oh my god, that is such bullshit!” Billo then says, “Muslims didn’t kill us on 9/11?”
After Goldberg tried making an excellent point of what religion Tim McVeigh was [and he was a mass murderer as well] Billo had nothing to say to that point, yet kept repeating, “Muslims killed us on 9/11”. Joy Behar and Goldberg both stood up and angrily walked off the set.
Naturally, after Behar and Goldberg are gone from the stage, Billo changes his tune and begins labeling the 9/11 hijackers “Muslim extremists”, a term he should have used from the get-go. After he gives his phony apology, Behar and Goldberg return to the set. I don’t agree with Behar and Goldberg walking off. Walking away from an argument makes the one you are debating with think they have won. It was a bad move on their part because walking away implies weakness. Billo cuts mikes on his show; these ladies walked off. Same difference.
It appears to Billo that it is a perfectly acceptable action to brand an entire religion evil for the actions of 19 if you already despise that particular religion. But, if you embrace a certain religion and someone from that religion commits a similar atrocity, then the religion is not the target or the influence of that individual, it’s just the person.
A better example that Goldberg could have used [other than McVeigh] is Scott Roeder, the [Christian] nut who walked into a church in May of 2009 and assassinated abortion doctor George Tiller. Ironically, Tiller just happened to be the subject of no less than nearly 30 segments of O’ Reilly’s show The O’ Reilly Factor in which Billo vilified Tiller for 4 years and said everything short of “I want to kill Tiller myself”. Billo didn’t have to. Roeder did it…and he most likely killed Tiller for [and no doubt, because of] O’ Reilly.
Is Billo saying, “a Christian killed George Tiller”??? No, of course he isn’t. Because not only is Roeder’s religion far from being an issue to O’ Reilly, but I would bet my life savings that Billo does not even consider Roeder’s actions a crime, let alone an act of terror.
Naturally, liberals are all over this story, but one liberal still couldn’t manage to avoid putting his foot in his mouth even though I agree with his condemnation of Billo. Dave Neiwert said this about Billo:
“O'Reilly simply can't escape a simple fact: His position on the "Ground Zero mosque" controversy is innately bigoted, because it is founded on conflating all Muslims with a tiny fringe of violent radicals.”
I agree with Neiwert here, but his statement could not be any more contradictory, since he writes stories on a daily basis [here’s one for example] that conflate all patriot groups and militia members with a tiny fringe of nutballs.
But Neiwert is correct about Billo being a colossal bigot. If you’re a terrorist and your skin is brown, your religious affiliation is of the utmost importance to Billo. If you blow up a building or kill an abortion doctor and you’re a Christian, Catholic or whatever, then of course that means nothing at all.
I am a equal opportunity religion-basher. Either every religion makes all of its disciples a tad nuttier than the rest of us who don’t believe in talking snakes, or religion has nothing to do with it at all [although I tend to go with the former]. Billo wants it both ways: He wants to bash every religion outside of Christianity [despite the fact that more bloodshed, wars and crimes have been committed in the name of Christianity than any other religion] and label every non-Christian who commits violent acts a terrorist.
I guess Billo will stick with his religion [whatever that is] despite the fact that it allows him to act like a raving lunatic. What is Billo in this clip but a terrorist without a bomb?
Watch Billo on The View
Here is the same clip from Crooks and Liars since YouTube will probably delete the video in the next 3 hours
Wednesday, October 6, 2010
October 6, 2010
Season 2 begins October 15
Premieres Fri, October 15 at 10P
Jesse storms Congress to find out if the government is conducting bio-warfare experiments at the mysterious Plum Island Animal Research Center off the coast of Long Island. The center began as a bio-warfare lab run by former Nazi scientists, and it has been blamed for spreading diseases and viruses throughout the mainland, including African swine flu and Lyme disease.
Premieres Fri, October 29 at 10P
Questions surrounding the military's secret research base in the Nevada desert have been swirling around for years. Jesse faces off against guards at Area 51, to find out why the Joint Terrorism Task Force raided the homes of two Area 51 watchdogs and to review alleged evidence that the government has been faking UFO sightings and alien abductions in order to cover up darker secrets at the base.
Premieres Fri, November 5 at 10P
Jesse goes inside the secret billionaire's boy's club to find out what caused the financial meltdown and how the group allegedly continues to manipulate and control the stock market and oil, gold and silver prices. From Wall Street to Washington, the governor barges in on the rich and powerful to demands answers.
Premieres Fri, November 12 at 10P
It's been said the government has a plan to declare martial law and round up millions of United State citizens into concentration camps. Jesse may have found a conspiracy in plain sight as he investigates the proliferation of law enforcement Fusion Centers around the country. And they may be connected to hundreds of detention centers ready to accept prisoners at the stroke of a Presidential pen.
Premieres Fri, November 19 at 10P
Never-published declassified CIA documents appear to support a link between the assassination of John F. Kennedy and the Watergate scandal that brought down Richard Nixon. To find out for sure, Jesse Ventura goes to Dallas, where he meets Lee Harvey Oswald's widow, Marina, and investigates the "Two Oswalds" theory that a CIA-groomed double killed JFK.
Secondary explosions caused lobby of World Trade Center to implode
Paul Joseph Watson
October 6, 2010
Newly obtained video that was reluctantly released by NIST after a lawsuit by the International Center for 9/11 Studies shows two firefighters on 9/11 discussing how secondary explosions occurred immediately before the collapse of the twin towers, providing damning new evidence that explosive devices were used to bring down the buildings.
Debunkers have repeatedly claimed that low-temperature burning jet fuel could weaken steel support columns enough to cause the pancake-style collapse of the twin towers, ignoring the plethora of eyewitness testimony to incendiary devices having caused the implosion of the World Trade Center structure.
The new tape is as clear cut as it comes – the firefighters, who were inside the lobby of one of the towers, unequivocally state that secondary explosions which occurred after the planes hit were responsible for causing the towers to collapse.
“There was an explosion….the third explosion the whole lobby collapsed on us,” states the firefighter. Asked “was that a secondary explosion,” he responds, “yes it was ….definitely secondary explosion”.
Another firefighter then confirms that there were at least three explosions which caused the lobby to collapse.
The only way to explain what firefighters described as “molten steel, like you’re in a foundary, like lava” being witnessed following the collapse of the towers was if powerful additional incendiary devices were used to take down the buildings.
The firefighters’ testimony compliments that of William Rodriguez, eyewitness to sub-level explosions that occurred before the impact of the first plane in the north tower and representative for many 9/11 victim’s families.
Rodriguez’ testimony is also confirmed by Anthony Saltalamacchia, a morning supervisor who managed over a hundred workers in the twin towers. Saltalamacchia was in sub-basement B1 of the North Tower, approximately 1,100 feet below the airplane’s impact point at floors 93 to 98.
“The explosion….at first we believe it came from the mechanical room and then we heard a series of other explosions that sounded up on the above levels of the building,” said Saltalamacchia.
Saltalamacchia then discusses how a man ran into the office with his skin hanging off. William Rodriguez had previously described the same scenario following basement level explosions and it was also seconded by another eyewitness, Kenneth Johannemann, an employee of ABM janitorial services.
“As we’re standing there, more explosions were happening,” said Saltalamacchia, before he urged Rodriguez and the other workers to leave the building. The group left and initially headed towards the lobby before they realized it too had been partially destroyed, conforming with the eyewitness testimony of the firefighters.
Despite Saltalamacchia’s plea to stay out of harm’s way, Rodriguez ran back into the burning building in an attempt to save his colleagues.
“The amount of explosions I heard from 8:46 to the time we got out was so many – at least ten – it was just like multiple explosions to where I felt there was different grenades, that’s what it sounded like, like different grenades being set off in the building,” said Saltalamacchia.
“It was one major explosion and then there was different explosions throughout that period of time until we got out,” he added.
Numerous other WTC basement workers, including Felipe David and Salvatore Giambanco, have also gone public with eyewitness testimony concerning massive sub-level explosions that took place before Flight 11 hit the north tower.
WTC construction worker Phillip Morelli was headed for level B-4 in Tower One [north tower], four stories below ground, when he was thrown to the floor by a violent explosion that coincided with the plane hitting 100 floors above.
15-year WTC worker Marlene Cruz told Peter Jennings in an interview with ABC News that she was also rocked by an explosion in the basement level of the north tower.
After filing a lawsuit that prompted NIST to release more than 3 terabytes of photographs and videos from their investigation into the collapse of the twin towers and WTC 7 on 9/11, the International Center for 9/11 Studies obtained evidence, in addition to the firefighter tapes, that suggests NIST edited several videos of the collapse of Building 7 in order to hide evidence of a controlled implosion. Building 7 was not hit by a plane and yet it collapsed demolition style late in the afternoon of September 11.
The Center filed a FOIA Request with NIST on January 26, 2009, seeking production of “all of the photographs and videos collected, reviewed, cited or in any other way used by NIST during its investigation of the World Trade Center building collapses.” Following several unsuccessful attempts to get NIST to even acknowledge receipt of the Request, the Center was forced to file a lawsuit on May 28, 2009. Shortly after the lawsuit was filed, the Request was assigned a reference number, and NIST began periodically releasing batches of responsive records.
The Center has now begun posting some of those images and videos online, the first batch of which is from an external hard disk drive “NIST WTC Investigation Cumulus Video Clips.”
In one of the clips, the video of which has been in the public domain for years, a loud, low-frequency boom can be heard just before the east penthouse of WTC 7 falls. Once the support columns that held up the penthouse are taken out, the rest of the building falls almost within its own footprint.
However, in subsequent clips released by NIST (National Institute of Standards and Technology), where the camera is located nearer to the building, the collapse of the penthouse is clearly edited out of the footage.
“Several clips from the Cumulus database show signs of editing. In the two video clips below, the collapse of the penthouse of World Trade Center 7 is cut out of the video. These videos happen to have been filmed from close to WTC 7, and have a high quality soundtrack that would have picked up explosion sounds from the charges that severed the columns supporting the penthouse, especially the explosion heard in the last video clip presented,” comments the International Center for 9/11 Studies.
In another clip, the entire collapse of the building is edited out, the audio is removed and only restored after the building has fully collapsed.
The Center also obtained videos of the collapse of the twin towers that had obviously been edited, with sections deliberately removed. “There are many video clips in the Cumulus database that do not show collapse initiation – the only event even purportedly explained in the final report from NIST on the Twin Towers,” states the Center.
Another new video shows Michael Hess yelling for help from the 8th floor window of WTC 7. The clip reinforces the fact that the building had not sustained any substantial damage before its free fall collapse within 7 seconds.
As we documented for several years, the collapse of WTC 7 is the smoking gun confirming that the official story behind 9/11 is bogus. The collapse of Building 7 was reported before it happened by several news stations, including BBC and CNN.
Explosions in WTC 7 were also reported by eyewitnesses inside the building, including Barry Jennings, who described a “big explosion” that blew him back to the 8th floor.
Other videos show firefighters talking about how the “building is about to blow up”.
The International Center for 9/11 Studies is still in the process of reviewing over 300 DVDs along with several external hard disk drives that contain a plethora of unseen photographs and video footage from ground zero. Judging by the small amount of damning footage already released, it’s highly probable that this data will provide a myriad of new contradictions both to the official 9/11 story as well as NIST’s own investigation into the collapse of the three buildings.