Sunday, January 31, 2010

Edge of Darkness: Another Hollywood Film That Exposes “Inside Job” government false flag agendas


by Larry Simons
January 31, 2010

The latest Mel Gibson film Edge of Darkness is excellent. Not only does it deliver another superb performance by Gibson, but it’s “edge of your seat” action sequences and plot make it worth watching it several times.

I won’t give away the entire movie for those who have not seen it, but I will mention that Hollywood has given us yet another film that exposes the very possibility that “Inside Job” false flag agendas of governments can be [and I believe they are] reality.

In the film, Gibson plays Tom Craven, a Boston police detective whose daughter is murdered literally right beside him. In Gibson’s search for her killer, he discovers the reason why she was killed: She worked for a research and development firm and discovered that the facility is secretly making terrorist dirty bombs. She attempted to whistleblow to the wrong people [a lawyer and a Senator] that they were using foreign parts so the United States could blame another country in the event that one of their manufactured bombs detonated in the U.S.

Obviously, this is only a fictional movie and is not intended to offer proof these scenarios exist, but it further indicates how in-touch Hollywood is with the very real plausibility of false flag operations in this country. Again, Hollywood is trying to beat this message into our heads.

To name just a few other movies/programs with false flag op themes:

*V for Vendetta
*Star Wars series [recent 3, episodes I, II, III]
*JFK [mentioned in the “call me X” scene]
*Jericho [TV show, but the entire theme of show is based on a false flag inside job]
*The Lone Gunman [TV show, “Pilot”, all about false flag ops---specifically mentioning and showing an airliner headed for the WTC and the plane takes off from Logan Airport in Boston]
*Shooter [a fictionalized account of how I believe the JFK assassination really happened]

Was Haiti Earthquake Another Foreknown Event like WTC Building 7?


In September of 2008, geologist and former professor, Patrick Charles, accurately predicted that Haiti earthquake was imminent

by Larry Simons
January 31, 2010

There have been several theories floating around as to what caused the Haiti earthquake that flattened Port-au-Prince on January 12. Some are saying it is the H.A.A.R.P. program in Alaska. Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez stated that he believes the United States was testing a tectonic weapon to induce the catastrophic damage inflicted on Haiti [which he may have been referring to H.A.A.R.P.].

I have no idea who is right, or if everyone is wrong and it was simply just an Earthquake. What I did find interesting is an article I came across from October 11, 2008 that talked about an original article written for Haiti’s Le Matin newspaper in September 2008. It reported that geologist and former professor at the Geological Institute of Havana, Patrick Charles, said that a 7.2 earthquake would inevitably hit Haiti, despite the fact that there had been no seismic activity in Port-au-Prince in 200 years.

Charles said, “Haiti is no stranger to large quakes with the destruction of Palais Sans Souci near the Citadelle in 1842. It has also been 200 years since any major seismic activity has occurred in Port-au-Prince. This means that the level of built up stress and energy in the earth could one day be released resulting in an earthquake measuring 7.2 or more on the Richter Scale.”

I am not saying that Charles is involved in a conspiracy. I am not saying H.A.A.R.P. caused the earthquake or that Hugo Chavez is right. I am saying that it is very odd that a geologist made a prediction that a massive 7.2 earthquake would inevitably hit Haiti [even though it had been 200 years since Haiti saw any seismic activity], that his prediction came true just 16 months later, and he was only off his Richter scale prediction by 0.2.

This is reminiscent to the “prediction” that WTC 7 was going to ‘imminently’ collapse on 9/11 by firefighters and police saying “that building’s gonna come down soon”. Now, obviously, I am only making the Haiti earthquake/WTC 7 connection in the sense that both events were catastrophic and that both events would serve an agenda only IF there is a conspiracy behind it. I am not saying both events are similar in any other way than that.

Obviously, both events are different. Geologists can predict seismic activity and be accurate. It was virtually impossible for firefighters/police or any city officials to know WTC 7 was going to collapse [since no other building in the history of architecture has collapsed due to minimal damage and small isolated fires] unless they were told by the chain of command that eventually ascends to the real perpetrators behind it.

There could be an agenda in Haiti, who knows? It is too early to tell. We have a shit load of military there and the earthquake could be a pretext to occupy it and set up bases there. I am not saying there is anything conspiratorial about the earthquake prediction…yet. When I read the article, the first thing that entered my mind [when I discovered how accurate Charles was and that the prediction was made only 16 months ago], was that it sounded as if it could turn out to be another “that buildings’ gonna come down soon” moment.

Only time will tell if I’m completely right, partially right, or completely wrong.

Friday, January 29, 2010

The Life and Times of ObamaBush: Obama ups spending on nuclear weapons stockpile

Not only is Obama spending more than Bush did on nukes, but this comes just days after he said during his SOTU address that the threat of nuclear weapons is the “greatest danger” to the American people

by Larry Simons
January 29, 2010

Nobel “Peace” Prize winner Barack Obama will announce on Monday that he is allocating 4.3 billion to maintain the United States stockpile of nukes, which is $370 million more than George W. Bush spent on nuclear weapons during his final year in office.

Adding to Obama’s hypocrisy of supposedly being a representation of peace while he continues war and is now funding nukes with more cash then Bush did, is what he said Wednesday night during his first State of the Union address:

“Even as we prosecute two wars, we are also confronting perhaps the greatest danger to the American people — the threat of nuclear weapons. I have embraced the vision of John F. Kennedy and Ronald Reagan through a strategy that reverses the spread of these weapons, and seeks a world without them.”

And that strategy?: Spend more money on them.

Watch him say it at 1:45 into this clip


A tad difficult to live in a world without nukes if you plan on spending 4.3 billion dollars to maintain stockpiles of them, eh?

Ahhh, yes, another one of those “shining” moments in the Obama presidency that not only makes warmonger George W. Bush nod with pride and approval, but you hear not one word about on liberal blogs.

Thursday, January 28, 2010

Ostroy denies he’s an Obama groupie and claims Obama is changing things, he is just slow in doing it

The reality is, Obama is fast in continuing Bush’s war, torture, warrantless spying, military commissions act and destruction of civil liberties

by Larry Simons
January 28, 2010

You really gotta love people like liberal blogger Andy Ostroy. It really takes a special person to be able to pull off what he does. We already know politicians blatantly lie and completely flip-flop on important issues. We know newspaper columnists lie and distort facts. We know political news anchors and commentators lie. These people have reasons to lie. They are controlled. Their strings are being pulled by higher powers.

But, here we have people like Andy Ostroy, who has no reason to lie. He doesn’t work for a newspaper or a TV news network; his strings are not being pulled by global elitists, bankers or secret societies [as far as we know], but yet, he is still a big fat flaming lying fraud. Why? Some people are just dishonest, that’s why. That’s just who they are.

Real Truth Online’s 2009 Fraudie winner starts off 2010 with yet another literary anthem of distortions and lies. In his latest article, titled, “The Problem with Democrats” [Jan 27], Ostroy asks, “What the fuck happened?” to his party [Democrat] in reaction to his savior Barack Obama’s approval ratings hovering around 50%. And the fact that unknown politicians like Scott Brown are winning elections in states like Massachusetts where normally Democrats win.

After criticizing a Facebook user who said they voted for Obama for President but they voted for Brown because, “I believe again we need change & action!", Ostroy said this:

“For Pete's sake, how much friggin' change do you need? How about voting for change and then giving those elected enough damn time to actually effect change before you toss 'em aside for more change?”

How much change do we need? Are you serious, Ostroy? How much change has there been? Obama has done absolutely nothing in his first year in office. Oh, wait a minute, yes he has.

*He has continued the Military Commissions Act, after briefly suspending it.
*He has sent more troops to Afghanistan, twice.
*He has rewarded failure by bailing out his buddies on Wall Street with hundreds of billions of dollars [of taxpayers’ money].
*He has not attempted to prosecute Bush for war crimes.
*He has continued the torture program that his eighth cousin, Dick Cheney, oversaw.
*He has continued detaining acquitted detainees indefinitely.
*He has broken his promise of transparency and has adopted the Bush form of transparency, which is: secrecy.
*He has told Americans [and the world] to not question the official story of 9/11.
*He has denied detainee access to legal representation.
*He has continued the illegal warrantless wiretapping program.
*He has continued Bush-like signing statements.

Most of the list above are things that were started under Bush and have continued. Others are as equally unconstitutional as the rest of the things Bush did. What change is Ostroy referring to?

When you purposely continue Bush policies, then you are not just slow in changing things, you are not making one single attempt to change, and many are beginning to realize the colossal mistake they made in voting for Obama. This is why Republicans are winning elections.

Ostroy will have you believe that Scott Brown won in Massachusetts because of an influx in Republican voters and that scores of Democratic voters were just tired of Obama, when in fact, the real difference in that election was the surge in Independent voters at the last minute.

Here’s the part that almost made me soak my jeans in urine. Ostroy continues:

I'm no Obama groupie, and I've certainly done my fair share of criticizing him and the party. But he's not a miracle worker, and deserves more than one year to undue to massive damage caused this country during eight years of the Bush administration.”

He’s no Obama groupie? If writing articles with titles such as, I Love Obama!, “Why Obama’s Peace Prize is Deserved”, “What Obama’s Done for America’s Confidence”, “You Want Real Change America? Choose the Black Democrat”, “Holy Shit, What an Amazing Week for Barack Obama”, “Why Obama Must Become President”, “I Want To Be Black” [in homage to Obama], “Oh-bama!”, “President Barack Hussein Obama. America’s Shining Moment” doesn’t earn you the title of “Obama groupie”, what does? Ostroy is actually right. It doesn’t make him a groupie; it makes him a disciple!

Keep in mind, these articles were only just a few of Ostroy’s love letters to Obama. Also, they are only the titles. Read the articles themselves. You’ll soon discover that Ostroy is not only a disciple, but also a worshipper of Barack Obama.

Not a miracle worker because he needs more than a year to undo damage caused by Bush? True, Bush brought utter catastrophe to America, which is all the more reason why Obama needed to spend less time at state dinners, making TV appearances on Letterman and Leno [which Ostroy wrote about as well] and on the golf course.

If I was elected Mayor of my town because the former Mayor spent too much money, increased taxes by 50%, failed to repair roads, laid off 1/3 of the police force causing increased crime and did nothing about drug dealers, and I stepped in and simply continued down the same incompetent path, would it be accurate if my supporters [if I had any] claimed that I was just slow in making changes?

Of course it wouldn’t. But Ostroy wants us to believe that Obama is just moving slowly to change things, despite him saying this on December 17:

“Have Democrats so thoroughly and so quickly blown their unprecedented seat at the controls? Has Obama failed so miserably to deliver on his promise of change? Have Republicans demonstrated once again that in the political equivalent of a street fight they know how to kick the crap out of liberals? Yes, yes, and yes.”

So, Ostroy is allowed to say “yes” to the question “Has Obama failed miserably to deliver on his promise of change?”, but when others acknowledge there has been no change and take action and vote in another party, they are condemned and criticized for it. Ya gotta love it.

Only Andy Ostroy [and other Democrats] is permitted to criticize Obama. When Republicans do it, they are “impatient” and expect Obama to be a “miracle worker”. It also appears as if Ostroy is the only one allowed to flip-flip as well; and that he has. In my 5 years of blog browsing, no one has flip-flopped more than Ostory.

Case-in-point: Just in a new article today [Jan 28], Ostroy said that one of his favorite moments of Obama’s State of the Union address on Wednesday night was “The Generals looking like 5-year-olds in a time-out when Obama said he's ending the Iraq War”.

He is? When is this happening? Before or after continued funding and increased troop levels? Before or after 1,000 more troops die? Before or after another trillion is borrowed from China? Before or after our economy completely bottoms out and comes to total collapse and our dollars’ value is zero?

Only one thing is guaranteed; that when [not if, when], Obama continues the Iraq war for 3, 4, 5, or 6 more years, Andy Ostroy will be defending his King.

Saturday, January 23, 2010

NASA Global Warming Alarmist Endorses Book That Calls For Mass Genocide


Dr James Hansen: Eco-fascist author who wrote that industrial civilization should be destroyed “has it right”

Paul Joseph Watson
Prison Planet.com
January 22, 2010

Prominent NASA global warming alarmist Dr. James Hansen has endorsed an eco-fascist book that calls for cities to be razed to the ground, industrial civilization to be destroyed and genocidal population reduction measures to be implemented in the name of preventing climate change.

Hansen, who was back in the news today commenting on a NASA press release that claims the last decade was the warmest on record, said that Keith Farnish, author of a new book called Time’s Up, is correct in calling for acts of sabotage and environmental terrorism in blowing up dams and demolishing cities in order to return the planet to the agrarian age.

Hansen is a key figure in the global warming movement, for it was his 1988 with testimony to a US Senate committee chaired by Al Gore that really got the ball rolling for the elite in their mission to hijack the environmental movement and promote apocalyptic fears of climate change as a means of seizing absolute power over humanity.

Author Farnish “believes – as the Hon Sir Jonathon Porritt does – that mankind is a blot on the landscape and that breeding (or for that matter, existence) should be discouraged,” writes James Delingpole.

“The only way to prevent global ecological collapse and thus ensure the survival of humanity is to rid the world of Industrial Civilization,” writes Farnish, adding that “people will die in huge numbers when civilization collapses”.

Farnish echoes similar talking points to those featured in White House science czar John Holdren’s Ecoscience textbook, which called for a “planetary regime” to carry out forced abortions and mandatory sterilization procedures, as well as drugging the water supply, in an effort to cull the human surplus.

Farnish explains his desire to see rampant population reduction in the name of saving the planet.

“In short, the greatest immediate risk to the population living in the conditions created by Industrial Civilization is the population itself. Civilization has created the perfect conditions for a terrible tragedy on the kind of scale never seen before in the history of humanity. That is one reason for there to be fewer people,” he writes.

And how is the collapse of industrial civilization to be achieved? By indiscriminate acts of sabotage and eco-terrorism.

“Unloading essentially means the removal of an existing burden: for instance, removing grazing domesticated animals, razing cities to the ground, blowing up dams and switching off the greenhouse gas emissions machine. The process of ecological unloading is an accumulation of many of the things I have already explained in this chapter, along with an (almost certainly necessary) element of sabotage,” writes Farnish.

But surely the respected and authoritative individuals we have been told by the media to trust when it comes to the science behind global warming would rebuke such outlandish, deranged and extreme methods of addressing climate change?

“Keith Farnish has it right: time has practically run out, and the ’system’ is the problem,” wrote Dr. James Hansen on the Amazon website. “Governments are under the thumb of fossil fuel special interests – they will not look after our and the planet’s well-being until we force them to do so, and that is going to require enormous effort.

It has also come to light that Hansen wasn’t even asked to comment on Farnish’s book, he freely volunteered his opinion. “Just to put the quote into context, it was indeed spontaneous from James and surprised me a little at first,” wrote author Farnish on the Yahoo Answers website.

“It’s an important thing to remember when we talk about AGW: many of the activist-scientists pushing it passionately want the earth to be getting hotter and it for it to be largely man’s fault. These watermelons certainly don’t want the opposite to be true, because then they wouldn’t have the excuse they so desperately need to destroy the capitalist system and take us all back to the agrarian age,” comments Delingpole.

The entire climate change takeover is being spearheaded by self-hating psychotics who want to impose a global one child policy in the name of curbing overpopulation. As we have vehemently proven, the overpopulation hype is a debunked myth with no basis in reality. The real reason global eugenicists want to implement such policies, along with taxing the life-giving gas carbon dioxide, is because it would give them absolute control over every single aspect of our lives – a control freak’s utopia.

The propagandistic method of depicting humans as the enemy is perfectly tailored to this agenda, because it elicits the response of making people call for their own kind to be regulated, controlled, and even killed under the contrived pretext of preventing an ecological apocalypse.

This approach was again evident in a recent United Nations sponsored poster campaign which depicted humans as evil horror movie monsters intent on slaughtering wildlife and killing the earth.

The global elite resolved to take this approach back in 1991 when the Club of Rome, a powerful globalist NGO committed to limiting growth and ushering in a post-industrial society, said in their report, The First Global Revolution, “In searching for a new enemy to unite us, we came up with the idea that pollution, the threat of global warming, water shortages, famine and the like would fit the bill…. All these dangers are caused by human intervention… The real enemy, then, is humanity itself.”

Genocidal psychotics are now trying to obtain the power to carry out the kind of nihilistic blueprint for terror Farnish outlines in his book in pursuit of their “post-industrial society”. What makes it all the more galling is that these eco-fascists present their lunacy in such a reasonable and sober tone. In reality, although they try to characterize humanity as a virus upon the planet, the only real cancer upon the earth is their virulently neo-fascist doctrine of warped environmentalism and population control.

The only real threat to humanity’s survival is not climate change, which has naturally occurred for eons since the very incarnation of planet earth, but the insane, self-destructive and monstrous plans to “solve” the issue being proposed by eco-fascists like Farnish and endorsed by people in prominent positions of influence like Hansen.

Tuesday, January 19, 2010

Tennessee Follows Texas In Banning Private Gun Shows


Licensing mandates dealers to turn over plethora of information to authorities under new legislation

Paul Joseph Watson
Prison Planet.com
January 19, 2010

Tennessee has followed Texas in demanding that dealers obtain licenses and turn over a plethora of information to authorities before being able to host a gun show in another devastating attack on the second amendment.

The legislation, HB 2422, which has not yet passed, would make it a Class A misdemeanor for any person to organize, plan, promote, or operate a gun show without government approval.

The bill makes it a crime for anyone who wishes to operate a gun show unless they follow the following procedures;

(1) Notifies the TBI and the chief law enforcement officer in the county in which the gun show is to be held of the dates, times, and location of the gun show;

(2) Verifies the identity of each gun show dealer participating in the gun show by examining a valid photo identification document of the dealer, before commencement of the gun show;

(3) Requires each gun show dealer to sign a ledger with information identifying the dealer, including the dealer’s name and address, before commencement of the gun show; and

(4) Maintains a copy of the records described above in (2) and (3) at the gun show promoter’s permanent place of business for one year from the date of the gun show.

The legislation also contains a blanket ban on all unlicensed gun sales within 1,000 feet of an unapproved gun show.

The bill would take effect on January 1, 2011 if signed into law.

As we highlighted yesterday, the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives is actively issuing directions banning private sales of guns without licenses at gun shows in Texas, despite there being no law to justify such demands.

A caller to the Alex Jones show brought attention to BATF notices handed out at the entrance of the Texas Gun And Knife Show, on North Lamar, in Austin this past weekend.

The flyers (pictured below) state that anyone selling a firearm “will be asked to comply with” conditions including operating through a licensed FFL dealer.

The notice also states that “Selling firearms in the parking lot will not be permitted.”

“The lady at the front desk used her ‘mommy voice’ to get everyone’s attention.” Scott from Austin told The Alex Jones show, noting that the owners of the private building where the gun show was held were contacted by the APD and the BATF and directed to hand out the notices.

Scott also told listeners that a petition in protest of the directions was being handed around at the show.




Friday, January 15, 2010

John Coleman’s brilliant new documentary: Global Warming: The Other Side


Hour-long documentary debunks global warming advocates and reveals startling information about manipulated data and hypocritical behavior of Al Gore

by Larry Simons
January 15, 2010

Watch Weather Channel founder John Coleman’s documentary on the Global Warming hoax. One hour long [total] broke up into 5 parts [indicated below].

Segment 1: Carbon dioxide, CO2, does not cause significant warming of the Earth
Segment 2: The amazing story of how Al Gore and the U.N. became involved in global warming
Segment 3: The global warming frenzy is full of dire predictions. This segment debunks them
Segment 4: Breaking news! Climategate comes to the United States
Segment 5: John Coleman's summation of the global warming debate

The best segments are segments 3 and 4. In segment 3, Coleman interviews Lord Christopher Monckton, who shows a clip from Al Gore’s 2006 film An Inconvenient Truth where it shows Gore showing a simulated mock graphic of the coastlines of San Francisco Bay, Florida and Manhattan being wiped out by rising sea levels in the event of “global warming” [Gore predicts sea levels will rise by 20 feet].

Monckton then reveals that in the very same year that Gore released the film, he bought a 4 million dollar condo in San Francisco, just feet from the ocean at Fisherman’s Wharf. Lord Monckton then says, “He [Gore] didn't believe his own prediction.” Quite great!

Read here about Gore’s San Francisco Bay condo that would be underwater if his own prediction came true. Here is a map showing the location of Gore’s condo and where the water would reach in Gore’s scenario [I mean, LIE] . I hope ole Al bought a lot of scuba gear!



The most disturbing part of the film is in segment 4 where Coleman talks to computer programmer E. Michael Smith, who reveals that the US temperature data set [the one that the government uses to proclaim that so and so month or so and so year is the 5th warmest/4th warmest, etc.. on record]. Smith reveals that those proclamations are based on bad data because he says cold thermometers have been removed from the temperature data series.

Smith says that there used to be about 6,000 thermometers [around 1970] in the temperature data series [meaning: 6,000 points around the globe where temps are measured], but around 1989 or 1990, the number of thermometers had plummeted to about 1,500. Smith says that temps were still being recorded in some areas where thermometers had been deleted, but when the temperature measurements went to the National Climate Data Center, they dropped it from the data set.

Smith says that in most places where the thermometers had been deleted were in cold areas like the Sierra Nevadas. So, when world temps are currently being calculated and government agencies say “2009 is the 5th warmest on record”, they are not lying per se, they may just be getting these calculations from the available thermometers that have not been deleted from the data set. In other words, they are not including the temperatures in cold places like the Sierra Nevadas, that way, they can claim they are not lying, but they are only giving us readings for 1,500 thermometers, not 6,000. In reality, global temps are much cooler because of the deleted thermometers, which would naturally distribute inaccurate data.

The question is, who is deleting these thermometers from the data set? I have a feeling if you followed the money, you’d find the answer.

Watch segment 4, it’s quite alarming.

Click here to watch the movie

Thursday, January 14, 2010

Scumbag Pat Robertson says Haiti deserved Earthquake because they made “pact with the devil


What is the reason for this man’s existence?

By Larry Simons
January 14, 2010

Yesterday on the 700 Club, “Christian” scumbag/evangelist Pat Robertson added to his incredibly long list of despicable and obtuse comments when he had this to say about the massive Earthquake that hit Haiti on Tuesday:

“Something happened a long time ago in Haiti, and people might not want to talk about it. They were under the heel of the French, uh, know, Napoleon the third and whatever, and they got together and swore a pact to the devil. They said, ‘We will serve you if you'll get us free from the French.' True story. And the devil said, ‘OK, it's a deal’, and they kicked the French out, the Haitians revolted and got themselves free, and ever since they have been cursed by one thing after the other, desperately poor.”

watch the clip


As Robertson sat there and spewed his shit, co-host Kristi Watts sat there like a graven image, nodding in agreement with a "yes Pat, I totally agree with you, because you're my employer and even if I dared to disagree with your hateful bile, I wouldn't tell you anyway, because I need my paycheck" look on her face, taking it all in as if she was listening to Martin Luther King Jr.'s "I Have a Dream" speech.

Before I even mention how big of a prick one has to be to make such a vile and hateful comment at the very moment thousands of people are crushed underneath tons of concrete and thousands more are homeless and hungry, let’s address the comment itself.

According to Salon.com’s interview with UCLA history and anthropology professor Andrew Apter, the facts about Haiti’s voodoo traditions and their third world status reveal that not only is Pat Roberston and old fucking, senile douchebag, but a blatant liar:

Is there any truth to what Pat Robertson is saying?
Of course not! Haitians are Christians. Pat Robertson's language is the reductio ad absurdum of the Christian right. It's so absurd it's almost funny. This notion of a pact with the devil is basically an echo of an old colonial response to the successes of the 1790s Haitian revolution.

What is this pact he's talking about?
Part of the revolution mythology is that one of the revolution leaders sacrificed a pig in Bois Caïmin in a voodoo ceremony and made a contract with Petwo [Haitian voodoo spirits]. It may or may not be true, but to call that a pact with the devil is a gross misrepresentation of what voodoo is. It's about anything but the devil. He's imposing an evangelical religious order on a much more sophisticated practice, and he's turning it into a cheap invocation of Satanism.


This is hate speech. It's saying these people are damned. It's a frequent theme among some Christians that Haiti is being punished for this supposed pact with the devil with extreme poverty and humanitarian crises. Tragically, many evangelical Christians in Haiti may actually, in their own extreme confusion and suffering and desperation, believe that God is punishing them.


The reason Haiti is poor is because Europe imposed a blockade on trade after the slave revolt in 1804, and you have an extremely polarized class structure in which a few families stepped into the positions of the former colonial plantation owners. There has been a horrible cycle of plundering and autocracy within Haitian leadership.

Why do you think this kind of obsession with Haitian voodoo persists?
There's a fascination with all things voodoo, not only in New Orleans but also on TV, on shows like "Bones," and it stems from the occupation of Haiti by the U.S. Marines in the first part of the 20th century. There were campaigns under certain Haitian governments in conjunction with the church to rout voodoo, but it didn't come close to working, because voodoo is part of everyday life in Haiti.

Do you think this has been holding Haiti back?
I think other factors are more important in holding Haiti back: the class structure, the dispossession of a largely illiterate populace, the links that the underclass increasingly has with drug gangs, which has generated a lot of violence, and the tradition of sweatshop labor. I think the backlash against voodoo is a kind of reflection of the problems, rather than a cause of it.


Saying the most hateful, vile and horrendous things is nothing new for Roberston.

Roberston has said the following in the past about:

9/11
Robertson "totally concur[red]" with Falwell on September 13, 2001 that the 9-11 attacks could be attributed in part to "the pagans, and the abortionists, and the feminists, and the gays and the lesbians." Rev. Jerry Falwell reportedly said of the 9-11 attacks: "I really believe that the pagans, and the abortionists, and the feminists, and the gays and the lesbians who are actively trying to make that an alternative lifestyle, the A.C.L.U., People for the American Way, all of them who have tried to secularize America, I point the finger in their face and say, 'You helped this happen.' '' Robertson, as reported by The New York Times, replied: “Well, I totally concur, and the problem is we have adopted that agenda at the highest levels of our government.”

Orlando, FL city officials [after they voted to fly rainbow flags from city lampposts during the annual Gay Days event at Disney World]. Robertson issued this warning to them in 1998:

“I don't think I'd be waving those flags in God's face if I were you. ... [A] condition like this will bring about the destruction of your nation. It'll bring about terrorist bombs, it'll bring earthquakes, tornadoes and possibly a meteor.”

Hugo Chavez
Robertson said on August 22, 2005:

“I don't know about this doctrine of assassination, but if he thinks we're trying to assassinate him, I think that we really ought to go ahead and do it. It's a whole lot cheaper than starting a war, and I don’t think any oil shipments will stop.”

Katrina victims
Robertson said on September 12, 2005:

“We have killed over 40 million unborn babies in America. I was reading, yesterday, a book that was very interesting about what God has to say in the Old Testament about those who shed innocent blood. And he used the term that those who do this, "the land will vomit you out." That -- you look at your -- you look at the book of Leviticus and see what it says there. And this author of this said, "well 'vomit out' means you are not able to defend yourself." But have we found we are unable somehow to defend ourselves against some of the attacks that are coming against us, either by terrorists or now by natural disaster? Could they be connected in some way?”

Citizens of Dover, PA [for voting off the school board all 7 members who believed in intelligent design]

Robertson said on November 10, 2005:

“I'd like to say to the good citizens of Dover: if there is a disaster in your area, don't turn to God, you just rejected Him from your city. And don't wonder why he hasn't helped you when problems begin, if they begin. I'm not saying they will, but if they do, just remember, you just voted God out of your city. And if that's the case, don't ask for His help because He might not be there.”

How does this piece of shit still get opportunity after opportunity to discharge these hate-driven, appalling comments? My deduction is that Robertson is the personification of the devil himself. Who else could be perpetually fueled by the most hate-filled and venomous remarks a human being could excrete and display this magnitude of utter contempt for other human beings but Lucifer himself?

I only have two words for you Pat......“Fuck” and “you”.

Keith Olbermann ripped Robertson a new ass last night for his disgraceful comments. Olbermann said this about Robertson [and Rush Limbaugh]:

“I would wish you to hell, but knowing how empty your souls must be to able to say such things in a time of such pain, I suspect the vacant purposeless of the lives you both live now are hell enough already.”

Way to go, Keith!


Visit msnbc.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy

Here’s Olbermann again adding more in response to Robertson’s hateful comments:


Visit msnbc.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy

I guess the United States [and the rest of the world] is desperately rushing in food, water, medical supplies and clothes to the devil's children, Pat? I guess that's the reason you're choosing to sit on your old, arthritic, lazy asshole inside your comfy studio while OTHERS do your good Samaritan work FOR you?

You make me SICK, you miserable glob of monkey spunk.

Sunday, January 10, 2010

Dave Neiwert attempts to debunk global warming deniers, but omits some small details

Those “small” details?: The scores of reports of record low global temps in 2009

by Larry Simons
January 10, 2010

Yesterday on the Obama-loving website Crooks and Liars, proven liar and fraudster David Neiwert, in an attempt to disprove global warming deniers, posted a story about FOX News’ Neil Cavuto doing a segment on his program about how unbearably cold it is right now across the country.

Cavuto said sarcastically, “Meanwhile another alert, a FOX News global warming alert. It’s still cold. It’s still really cold. It’s still really FREEZING!”

Neiwert said this, “Take Neil Cavuto yesterday. He opened the segment by talking about how cold temperatures are right now. This is a big surprise, since we're in the dead of winter. But this is part of the larger theme: It's colder than crap here in America, so that must mean there's no global warming! We're hearing it constantly. Fairly typical of this approach was the e-mail we got yesterday from a reader who wanted to defend Hannity:

Sean Hannity may be many things, but your claim his statement about 2009 being colder is a lie doesn't hold water. In fact, Accuweather.com says this winter may be the worst and coldest since 1985.


http://www.accuweather.com/news-weather-features.asp?#extremes

Please stop misleading people into this global warming crap.


Dave Boylen
Maui, Hawaii


If you go to the story he links, you'll find a story about how we're getting record-cold temperatures this year in the United States. Because, of course, the USA is the only part of the globe that matters. Temperatures elsewhere? Who cares?”


I love when global warming defenders attempt to make the point that the reason it is cold is because it's winter time. If global warming really existed, would it only act when it was summer, spring or fall? Would we be seeing scores and scores of record-setting freezing temps all over the world when temps are supposed to be warmer? Isn't that the same logic that the "hot water freezes faster" people use?

Heaven knows that I’m no defender of FOX News, but when they’re right, they’re right. While true that the link posted by the reader above only refers to United States temperatures, it is also true that Neiwert conveniently leaves out small, pesky facts like temperatures even globally have been at mind-staggering record lows and have been fairly consistently cold all year.

Below, I have listed just a small fraction of reports of global record-setting low temps. Like I said, all small fraction.

January 2009: London was colder than parts of Antarctica
January 2009: Gloucestershire saw coldest winter since 1978
January 2009: Russia’s Pravda reported we may be on the brink of an Ice Age
January 2009: Shanghai saw coldest winter in 18 years
February 2009: Record low temps in Switzerland
March 2009: Britain saw coldest winter in 13 years
March 2009: Ireland saw coldest winter in 20 years
March 2009: Cuba winter among coldest on record
April 2009: Melbourne reported coldest April morning in 56 years
April 2009: Antarctic ice growing, NOT shrinking
May 2009: New Zealand glaciers growing, NOT shrinking
July 2009: Ottawa saw their coldest July in 17 years
July 2009: Wairarapa, New Zealand saw their coldest May on record
September 2009: NOAA says summer of 2009 was 34th coolest on record and more than 2,000 record lows recorded
November 2009: Hong Kong saw their coldest winter in 120 years
December 2009: Record low temps in Ireland
December 2009: Scotland colder than Iceland
December 2009: Intense cold wave sweeps North China
December 2009: Two die in freezing temps in Britain
December 2009: Beijing saw lowest temps in a decade
December 2009: Scotland saw worse snow and ice in 20 years
December 2009: Europe saw snow dipping below –33 C

I guess Neiwert just “forgot” to mention these examples of global freezing temperatures to his zombie-like readers. I could have listed many, many, many more, but how many do I have to list before my point is made? Neiwert listed zero examples of global warming temps [outside of the U.S.]. I guess just as long as he says there’s no global freezing, that’s good enough, eh?

I find it ironic that Neiwert said “Temperatures elsewhere? Who cares?”, yet didn’t link to one specific story that reported high global temps. Obviously, even Neiwert didn’t care about temperatures “elsewhere” either, or it would not have required Real Truth Online to actually list them.

Neiwert himself would have done that.

Friday, January 8, 2010

Security and technology expert lies about body scanners on TODAY Show; says they would have stopped Detroit terror attempt


Segment also shows the scanned body blurred out in genital area; a blatant admittance body scanners show clear nudity

by Larry Simons
January 8, 2010

On Friday morning’s fourth [and final] hour of the TODAY Show, hosts Hoda Kotb and fill-in host Piers Morgan [of 'America’s Got Talent', filling in for Kathie Lee Gifford] discussed airport security, specifically body scanners.

They introduced Mark Laustra, Vice President of Transportation Security Technology & Programs for Smiths Detection, who demonstrated an airport body scanner by having a man stand in front of the scanner and turn his body around.

What I found interesting is that right before the man [named Jim] stepped in front of the scanner, host Hoda Kotb says:

“So he’s [Jim] got some contraband, uh, different various things on him, so why don’t you take a stroll through the uh, through the machine and let’s see what happens. And we’ve sort of fuzzed out a little bit ‘cause it’s uh, a little bit funky, alright..”

What she meant by the phrase “a little bit funky” is that the scanner shows Jim “a lotta bit NAKED”; a clear admittance that the body scanners show naked images of human beings. Notice after Kotb mentioned the fuzzing out of Jim’s image, Laustra makes no attempt to rebuke or correct her.


Laustra pointing at scanned naked image of a man. Notice the blurring out of the genital area

Laustra begins pointing at Jim’s naked image on the body scanner and describes the different items of contraband that Jim is carrying on his person [boxcutter, plastic knife and explosive simulant]. Co-host Piers Morgan says, “Which is like what the guy had before Christmas, right? So, with this technology, would you have stopped that guy, do you think? If they were vigilant when they watched the procedure, do you think the people at the airport would have seen what he had on him? That’s the crucial question.”

Laustra evades Morgans question and says, “This is a tool, another tool for the screeners to use to detect this, these types of things, and uh..” , Morgan interrupts Laustra, clearly illustrating that Laustra ignored his question and says, “But specifically on that guy with what he had and the way he packaged it. Would your machine have identified that?”

Laustra still evades the question and says [clearly stuttering and appearing nervous], “Well yeah, you, youu, uuu, you, can plainly see the anomaly underneath the clothing, yes.”

Well, first of all, Laustra admitted in the segment that the scanner only detects anomalies, not SPECIFIC objects. He pointed at an object on Jim’s torso area and called it an “explosive simulant strapped to the body”. How in the hell would he know it was an explosive simulant? It was clear in the segment that all the scanner showed was a dark object on Jim’s torso, and Laustra could tell it was an explosive simulant?

Secondly, Laustra ignored Liers Morgan’s question [about whether the scanner would have stopped the Christmas day terror attempt] twice. Morgan did not ask whether you could see an anomaly underneath clothing. He asked if airport employees would have known an explosive was on the would-be bombers’ person. Laustra stepped around the specific thing Morgan was asking and ignored it, two times.

Earlier Laustra pointed to an object on Jim’s left leg and said, “We see a plastic knife right about here.” How could he tell it was a plastic knife? The only thing that must have been clearly identified was Jim’s penis, since NBC felt the need to blur it out.

Laustra is a liar, simply because it was reported on January 3, 2010 that these machines cannot detect chemicals or light plastics. In fact, the report says that the only devices that can detect these things are X-ray machines, but that they pose health risks and are too slow to operate. In the TODAY Show segment, Laustra told Morgan and Kotb that the scanners were completely safe and pose no health risks from the radio waves.

I wonder why they didn’t use a female as the body scanner guinea pig, or a child? Were they too afraid that it would be blatantly obvious that the body scanners would be seen by millions of viewers as a total violation of our privacy? Or that the scanners would violate child porn laws?

watch the clip [starts at 4:55 into the clip]

Visit msnbc.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy

Wednesday, January 6, 2010

Global Warming? Really? Tell that to the residents of Fulton, NY, who have endured snowfall for NINE straight days!


55 inches of snow and counting in Fulton, NY; more to come

by Larry Simons
January 6, 2010

For 9 straight days now, it has not stopped snowing in Fulton, NY. Since December 28, Fulton residents have had to go out and shovel snow two or three times daily to battle the nearly 55 inches of snow that has fallen.

All across the United States, the frigid temps have been blasting areas that have never seen inclement weather of this magnitude. States like Tennessee, Florida, New Jersey are being blasted with record temps, and 4 people have even died from hypothermia in Tennessee.

To make matters worse for the people of Fulton, NY, the forecast for the next three days: snow.

How do the global warming frauds explain this? I'm sure the people of Fulton are praying for some global warming right about now.

Click here for segment from ABC [embedding is disabled on YouTube]

Pat Buchanan has no problem at all with uninformed opinions


Buchanan admits Brit Hume’s idiotic statement about Tiger Woods 'turning to the Christian faith' is uninformed but defends it anyway

by Larry Simons
January 6, 2010

This past Sunday, FOX News’s Brit Hume decided to take it upon himself to become Tiger Woods’ spiritual advisor on FOX News Sunday. This is what Brit Hume said [warning: if you've never heard of Brit Hume or heard him speak, imagine the worst sounding voice possible speaking the quote below]:

“Tiger Woods will recover as a golfer. Whether he can recover as a person, I think is a very open question and it’s a tragic situation with him. I think he’s lost his family. It’s not clear to me whether he will be able to have a relationship with his children….the extent to which he can recover seems to me depends on his faith. He is said to be a Buddhist. I don't think that faith offers the kind of forgiveness and redemption offered by the Christian faith. My message to Tiger is, 'Tiger turn to the Christian faith and you can make a total recovery and be a great example to the world.””

I wanted to write something about this dickhead when he first said this, but wanted to wait for the shitstorm that would ensue from the media, and for colossal douchebags like Pat Buchanan to crawl from their primordial slime to defend the FOX News neocon prick. I didn’t have to wait long. On Tuesday, MSNBC’s David Shuster and Tamryn Hall ripped Buchanan a new ass for supporting Hume.

Shuster asked Buchanan, “Is it ever, ever a wise idea for a political analyst to essentially anoint themselves somebody’s spiritual advisor, denigrate that person’s religion and do so on a Sunday political talk show?”

Buchanan replies:

“Well, I consider myself a friend of Brit Hume, and I think he was being candid and honest and I don’t know what the Buddhist religion is, but there’s no doubt that Christianity is a religion of mercy and forgiveness and it’s conditional of course upon people altering their life and being sorry for what they’ve done…..”

Well, first of all Pat, thanks for completely ignoring Shuster’s question. Second, if you don’t know what the Buddhist religion is, then how can you even imply that Christianity is better and support someone who basically said it is? Third, are you saying Buddhism is not a religion of mercy and forgiveness and not conditional upon people altering their life? You just admitted you “don’t know what the Buddhist religion is”, so how can you even imply that a religion you know nothing about does not offer the exact same benefits [or better ones] as the religion you are endorsing?

watch the clip


Buchanan continues, “I’m not bothered by Brit Hume doing that. I think he means well….he was giving some sort of personal, his personal thoughts on it. I don’t really have a problem with Brit doing that, quite frankly.”

Attacking another person’s religion is “meaning well”? I do my share of attacking on this site, but for the most part, I’m attacking the person’s behavior, not the religion itself and I often strongly imply that they should not act that way if they are sincere about their religion. Hume was proselytizing and attacking the religion when he admittedly knows nothing about the religion he is attacking. Big difference.

Tamryn Hall chimes in and makes a great point about all the “christian” politicians that have been involved in their own scandals in the past year alone and says, “Do we need to run down the list..?” Yes, I agree. Do I really need to mention the scores and scores of Christian politicians and leaders who have been involved in some of the most heinous, vile and self-serving behavior in just the past year? Or in the last five years? I could, but I have to maintain some brevity to this story.

Buchanan responds by saying, “I don’t think he [Hume] was saying that all Christians are not flawed and no Christian sins. I think what he was saying was….Christianity is a religion of mercy and forgiveness but…..”, then Shuster interrupts and says, “But Pat, he was denigrating Buddhism in the process.”

Exactly. Hume was denigrating another religion in the process. What imbecile Pat Buchanan fails to comprehend is that while he sat there defending Hume for his “Tiger Woods’ religion is not a real religion” rhetoric, Buchanan was being his usual hypocritical/fraudie self by supporting someone [Hume] who was violating Christianity by judging another person.

At the end of the segment, Tamryn Hall makes the point I would have made [but was much nicer than I would have been].

Hall: In the comments that were made by Mr. Hume, he says, “I don’t think that religion offers the kind of forgiveness and redemption…” “I don’t think”, he couldn’t even say he studied it or knows, and I think that is the lesson here. Before we start putting our faith on someone else, maybe we should learn a little bit about theirs. You yourself Pat have said you don’t know much about the religion of being a Buddhist, so before we start throwing what we think is right in front of someone else’s plight, let’s learn about theirs.”

Buchanan: That’s his opinion! You say it’s an uninformed opinion…OK! It’s an uninformed opinion! Do we have a problem with a guy having an opinion?

Uhhh, yeah, if it's UNINFORMED....ya big penis!

Like the old saying goes, you are entitled to your own opinions, but you’re not entitled to your own facts.”

Here are the facts about forgiveness and mercy in the Buddhist religion:

“The topic of forgiveness may seem at first sight remote from the concerns of Buddhism. Buddhism does not conceive of ultimate truth in the guise of a personal God. Its concepts of error and defilement do not readily translate into the Biblical notions of sin and guilt. The Buddhist solution to unwholesome dispositions is to overcome them by following the path that leads to release; acts of pardon and grace have little to do with it. In some early Buddhist texts, the emphasis falls not on forgiving, but on the foolishness of taking offense in the first place:

“He abused me, he struck me, he overcame me, he robbed me”—in those who harbor such thoughts hatred will never cease.


“He abused me, he struck me, he overcame me, he robbed me”—in those who do not harbor such thoughts hatred will cease.

(Dhammapada 1.3–4; trans. Radhakrishnan)


In contrast, biblical rhetoric is full of references to enemies, slanderers, persecutors. Buddhism might unmask a delusion here, rather than go on to talk of forgiving one’s enemies and blessing one’s persecutors. Biblical salvation is atonement for evils that have already occurred; but Buddhist salvation is more an effort to prevent the evils from arising in the first place.

When they have already arisen, it calmly proceeds to dismantle them by going back to their roots. One universal process of karmic causality presides over all evils and the cure for them. Even the ultimate goal of undoing the chains of karma and entering the freedom of nirvana is attained through following this analytical procedure. There is no supernatural dissolution of bondage to evil by an act of grace (at least in early Buddhism). Thus, when we seek resources in Buddhism for a clarification and underpinning of the Biblical ideas of sin, forgiveness, grace, reconciliation, and atonement, we face the risk that these notions themselves will disappear in light of Buddhism’s higher wisdom."


This is just my interpretation, but from the above portion from this website, it appears as if this writer is saying that forgiveness in Buddhism goes much deeper than that of Christianity. In Buddhism, there’s no act of forgiving per se, because in order for there to be an act of forgiving, there has to be a negative and resentful state of mind toward a person in order for there to be something to forgive. It appears this author is saying that Buddhists are in a perpetual state of “forgiving” and self-awareness and do not even allow the unwholesome thought toward the individual to enter their mind.

The writer also says this about September 11:

“The terrorist incident of September 11, 2001, did not elicit many memorable responses from religious thinkers. Buddhists floated some tentative ideas on the Internet about “the causes and conditions giving rise to suffering” (Gene Reeves) and the need “to see our own karmic responsibility for the terrible acts that have befallen us” (David R. Loy). The Christian rhetoric of forgiveness and reconciliation was scarcely heard at all.”

Pretty profound stuff there…wow. How true that is. After 9/11 happened, how many “christian” leaders/politicians/pundits wanted every Muslim to die [and still do]? How many of them wanted war [and still do]? How many of them wanted torture of detainees [and still do------in fact, Pat Buchanan supports torture! Where's HIS forgiveness?]? From Ann Coulter to James Dobson to Pat Roberston, every singleso-called” christian wants Muslims [and really everyone who is not Christian] to be wiped off the face of the Earth.

That's forgiveness??

In my experiences, Christians are the most vindictive, destructive, vengeful, intolerant harborers of hate I have ever seen, and these examples from Hume and Buchanan are just another chapter in the Christian lunacy handbook.

Here are clips showcasing the blatant hypocrisy of those who call themselves “Christian”

Hume talking about enemies being “defeated”---where’s his forgiveness??


Pat Buchanan supporting torturing enemies----where’s his forgiveness??


Moron Pat Robertson saying Hume’s comment was “right on”


As I read more about the Buddhist faith and re-read the excerpts above about Buddhism forgiveness, it’s actually quite beautiful when you think about it. Would I be able to do that? Hell no. I have too much anger in my heart toward assholes like Brit Hume and Pat Buchanan that I would never be worthy enough to be even a weak Buddhist.

But, I assure you that if Brit Hume and Pat Buchanan learned that Buddhists did not forgive them for what they said about their religion, they would be filled with glee. On the contrary Hume and Buchanan, they have nothing to forgive. They never harbored any hatred or resentment toward you in the first place.

Keith Olbermann rips Hume a new one here

Visit msnbc.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy

Tuesday, January 5, 2010

Airports Set To Become Primary Peddlers Of Child Porn

Invasion of the body scanners: Fat greasy perverts sitting alone in back rooms get ready to enjoy your naked children

























The man is seeing a naked image of the woman similar to the top picture.

Paul Joseph Watson
Prison Planet.com
January 5, 2010

The establishment is ensuring that pedophiles and perverts are kept entertained at airport security checkpoints by mandating the mass rollout of naked body scanners that provide detailed images of your child’s genitalia, to be enjoyed by officials sat alone in back rooms.

Despite official assurances and media talking points that claim the naked body scanners now being implemented in airports worldwide do not show enough detail to be considered a violation of privacy, the true measure of how much of an intrusion they really are is proven by the fact that they break child pornography laws in the UK that bar the production of indecent images of children.

Ministers in the UK will be forced to exempt under-18’s from the virtual strip searches or pass new legislation that protects airport workers from being prosecuted as pedophiles.

“They also face demands from civil liberties groups for safeguards to ensure that images from the £80,000 scanners, including those of celebrities, do not end up on the internet,” reports the Guardian. “The Department for Transport confirmed that the “child porn” problem was among the “legal and operational issues” now under discussion in Whitehall after Gordon Brown’s announcement on Sunday that he wanted to see their “gradual” introduction at British airports.”
“They do not have the legal power to use full body scanners in this way,” said Terri Dowty, of Action for Rights of Children, adding there was an exemption in the 1978 law to cover the “prevention and detection of crime” but the purpose had to be more specific than the “trawling exercise” now being considered.

As the Guardian report highlights, despite the fact that news organizations routinely blur out sensitive areas of the body when showing images produced by the scans, the actual resolution of the images allows airport workers to see “genitalia and breast enlargements”.

Despite the promise that the images would immediately be deleted, Simon Davies of Privacy International warns that scans of celebrities or of people with unusual or freakish body profiles would prove an “irresistible pull” for some employees.

Indeed, the fact that your sons and daughters will potentially be subject to a virtual strip search where the shape and detail of their genitalia will be visible to someone sat alone in a back room begs the question of what kind of people would want to apply for such a job. If such technology is rolled out on a widespread basis, working in airport security will undoubtedly become a pull for perverts and pedophiles who will be given free reign to lust over your naked child’s body. How far will Americans acquiesce in the name of safety?

This compilation of articles proves that people in positions of power have routinely and illegally abused surveillance technologies for their own personal titillation, particularly in regard to young women and children.

A school in Overton County, Tennessee was sued to the tune of $4.2 million in damages by parents after school officials allowed surveillance cameras to be installed in locker rooms of children aged 10-14, with the images showing both girls and boys in various stages of undress.

Another case in Sutherland high school New York found that head school custodian Allen Wemes had kept a pornographic stash of footage filmed by a secret surveillance camera placed in a female restroom.

In June 2004, the director of a tutoring center in Chicago was charged with manufacturing and possessing child pornography after he was discovered to be operating a sophisticated video surveillance system in the bathroom of the Beverly Instructional Center.

These are just a few of dozens of cases in the U.S. alone where officials have been caught abusing invasive surveillance technologies for their own perverted pleasure. If similar technology is to be implemented on a mass scale in airports as is being proposed, we are going to see such violations skyrocket to an industrial level.

A familiar tactic employed to convince the public that the scanners are necessary is the repeated use of images that show concealed weapons, creating the perception that everyone is guilty and needs to be scanned. This is reinforced by the public being made to hold their hands up when they enter the scanner in a symbolic act of submission, when holding their arms out horizontally would be no different.

How much humiliation, fealty and degradation are we prepared to accept in the name of being protected from a menace that the government has proven time and again it has no motivation in stopping? The very people promoting the mass implementation of body scanners stand to reap the financial rewards because they are heavily invested in the technology.

Are we going to allow perverts and pedophiles in positions of power enjoy naked images of our children or are we finally going to draw a line in the sand and say enough is enough and start boycotting and filing lawsuits against airports and other institutions that attempt to ram through these revolting and dehumanizing measures?

Saturday, January 2, 2010

Come on China, get with the program!


by Larry Simons
January 2, 2010

My god, is it really 2010? Happy New Year everyone! Thought I’d start the new year [and decade] off with a little satire [not really]. Seems the Chinese need to take lessons from the United States when it comes to building demolition.

watch the clip


A Chinese demolition company turns this 22-story residential building into the Leaning Tower of Liuzhou. Why didn’t the Chinese just send an airliner through the building in the background so the debris that emitted from it could strike their targeted building, causing fires and weakening the steel so it could come crashing down?

Come on China, do things the right way!