Friday, March 5, 2010

As Predicted, Pentagon Shooting Blamed On 9/11 Truth


Two days after we warned that anti-government activists were about to be framed for violence, Californian man attacks police officers, media cites motivation as advocacy for 9/11 truth

Paul Joseph Watson
Prison Planet.com
March 5, 2010

Just two days after we warned of false flag domestic attacks that would be blamed on the federal government’s political adversaries were all but inevitable, a Californian man attacked the Pentagon last night in a shooting that wounded two police officers and has since been blamed on the John Patrick Bedell’s advocacy for 9/11 truth.

On Wednesday we explained how a Southern Poverty Law Center report which demonized We Are Change 9/11 truth organizations in the same breath as violent racist skinhead groups was part of a preparatory set-up for violent domestic acts that would be blamed on anti-government extremists.

We pointed out that since examples of Americans committing violence in pursuit of their political beliefs, FBI patsy Timothy McVeigh aside, were thin on the ground, organizations like the SPLC were begging for such incidents to occur in order to provide the federal government with the pretext to crack down on dissent and silence free speech on the Internet.

Low and behold, last night 36-year-old John Patrick Bedell calmly walked up to a subway station immediately adjacent to the Pentagon building, pulled out a gun and opened fire at point blank range.

“He walked up very cool. He had no real emotion on his face,” said Richard Keevill, chief of Pentagon police.

Two officers were injured before Bedell was gunned down and later confirmed dead in the early hours of the morning.

Authorities said they were investigating reports of a second man at the scene who was apparently aiding the shooter.

As is routine, people who knew Bedell expressed shock that he would attempt such an attack.
“He just seemed like a normal guy to me,” Ronald Domingues said. “I wouldn’t suspect he would be involved in anything like this.”

Under the headline, Pentagon Shooter Railed Against U.S. on Internet, the Associated Press reports that one of the primary motivations for the attack was Bedell’s “Resentment of the U.S. government and suspicions over the 9/11 attack.”

“Signs emerged that Bedell harbored ill feelings toward the government and the armed forces, and had questioned the circumstances behind the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks,” according to the article.

Bedell was also “determined to see that justice is served,” according to another Internet posting, in response to the death of Marine Col. James Sabo, which was ruled a suicide but suspected by Bedell to be a cover-up.

“Officials said they’d found no immediate connection to terrorism but had not ruled it out,” states the report.

The proximity of the incident to the release of the SPLC report is seamless and the implication is clear – anyone who demands that ‘justice be served’ in response to government corruption or anyone who demands the truth behind 9/11 be made public is a dangerous extremist who is likely to go on a shooting rampage.

The media attempted to craft a similar scenario following the Richard Poplawski shooting, which killed three Pittsburgh police officers, despite the fact that the incident arose as a result of a domestic dispute between Poplawski and his mother, and not as a consequence of Poplawski’s political beliefs, as the media attempted to spin the events.

The debunkers and the establishment can now have a field day with the Pentagon shooting and use it to make the case that 9/11 truthers are violent and should be silenced, ignoring the fact that not a single 9/11 truther has committed an act of violence in pursuit of their beliefs, and despite efforts to frame 9/11 truther Gary Talis when he was falsely accused of attacking a girl in a wheelchair. Talis was acquitted by a New York jury despite New York police officers and one Secret Service agent lying in claiming Talis had assaulted the girl when in fact he was the one being assaulted by the girl’s father.

There can be little doubt that we will see more incidents like last night’s shooting and, whether genuine or staged, they will be exploited to the maximum by the establishment media and the government to portray anyone who questions 9/11 and anyone who expresses “resentment” about how they have been looted for trillions of dollars as violent extremists who need to be silenced.

Such incidents will dovetail perfectly with the rapid advancement of cybersecurity and Internet censorship laws that will force people to obtain licenses to exercise free speech on the web, while providing Homeland Security with the perfect pretext to increase surveillance of all Internet traffic and communications.

11 comments:

Larry's insane said...

anti-govt activists - who believe all the same shit as you and 911 Troof - kill people, as warned, and you nutters just shrug it off as another "conspiracy" to dirty your name!

Ridiculous.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2010/mar/04/us-surge-rightwing-extremist-groups

Larry said...

Richard Poplawski criticized Alex Jones for not being anti-semitic.

James Von Brunn hated FOX News, the Bush's and John McCain.

Amy Bishop, the University of Alabama shooter---was an Obama supporter.

Seems to me, it's mostly "LEFT" wing people who are on a rampage these days. Besides, if youre anti-government, why does that automatically equal "RIGHT wing"? "LEFT" wingers dont hate the government?

The assassination attempts on Ford and Reagan [two Republican presidents] were from RIGHT wingers?

The Fort Hood shooter attended Obama seminars. PLUS, how can someone be a 9/11 truther AND RIGHT wing at the same time? 9/11 truth is considered a "FAR-LEFT" ideology!

So, if you just question something like 9-11 that's littered with holes throughout the entire official report and you go shoot people, then its BECAUSE of your beliefs?

What sense does it make to be angry about 3,000 murders of innocent American citizens and then go out and shoot innocent Americans? It makes ZERO sense [its as asinine as anti-abortion people killing abortionists], and the very people who write columns or talking heads on TV who attempt to make that connection KNOW it's bullshit, it's an obvious attempt to destroy our credibility and associate us with being "nuts" because they cant debunk our claims. And YOUVE never debunked them either, The Last Fraud Left.

Yes I know its you because my Sitemeter tells me it you---douchebag.

the_last_name_left said...

Richard Poplawski criticized Alex Jones for not being anti-semitic.

No - you know this is untrue.

Poplawski wrote (at Nazi Stormfront) that he was "not 100% sure" if Alex Jones was anti-semitic.

James Von Brunn hated FOX News, the Bush's and John McCain.

So does Stormfront. Nazis hate all those things - but not as much as they hate liberalism, socialism, democracy, etc.

Seems to me, it's mostly "LEFT" wing people who are on a rampage these days.

Prove it?

BTW - you deny there's any such thing as "LEFT" - so what in hell are you on about?

Regardless, let's see who and what you call left, and let's see how they are "on a rampage"......

So, if you just question something like 9-11 that's littered with holes throughout the entire official report and you go shoot people, then its BECAUSE of your beliefs?

It isn't because of what you had for dinner.

It makes ZERO sense

So. We're not talking about sensible people or sensible actions, by definition.

it's an obvious attempt to destroy our credibility and associate us with being "nuts"

Nobody invented the FACT that Poplawski was a member of Stromfront - nor that he was familiar with and shared many of Alex Jones' (and your own) views.

Likewise with Von Brunn.

Nobody invented the FACT that Stack flew his plane into the IRS.....for much the same reasons you would perhaps like to do so too.

Anonymous said...

Just two days after we warned of false flag domestic attacks that would be blamed on the federal government’s political adversaries were all but inevitable.......

HAHA - false flag? it isn't false flag.

.. a Californian man attacked the Pentagon last night in a shooting that wounded two police officers and has since been blamed on the John Patrick Bedell’s advocacy for 9/11 truth.

It isn't "false flag". That's an inversion of reality. The dude was "anti-government" and filled with the paranoia that permeates and characterises Troofers.

"False flag" is a device to protect the nuttiness of Troofers from deserved criticism for their responsibility.

I thought conservatives were all for personal responsibility......and yet look at how they react? Blame the government! HAHA

Larry said...

"Richard Poplawski criticized Alex Jones for not being anti-semitic.

No - you know this is untrue."

So, 3 or 4 websites issued retractions to their original stories because it was false???

"So does Stormfront. Nazis hate all those things - but not as much as they hate liberalism, socialism, democracy, etc."

Name one good thing about any of the 3 you mentioned. By the way, America is NOT a democracy, its a REPUBLIC. You'd know that if you was American---AND informed.

"So, if you just question something like 9-11 that's littered with holes throughout the entire official report and you go shoot people, then its BECAUSE of your beliefs?

It isn't because of what you had for dinner."

First of all...Oh brother....secondly....name ONE reason WHY [if you thought the government was responsible for killing 3,000 innocent Americans] you would respond to that NINE YEARS LATER and shoot INNOCENT police officers????? You IGNORED that the first time I asked it. Gee, I really hope you answer it THIS time.

"It makes ZERO sense

So. We're not talking about sensible people or sensible actions, by definition."

Loved how you chopped up my post again. The "it makes zero sense" was actually connected to my "Why would anyone shoot innocent Americans as a reaction to the government killing innocent Americans?" question, but you IGNORED the question and just respond to the "it makes zero sense line.

Was Amy Bishop sensible? She was an Obama supporter and went on a shooting spree at the University of Alabama------you ignored me saying THAT too.....hmmm, I wonder why. SHES a liberal and a SOCIALIST and yet she went bonkers and went on a shooting spree. So, if you want to play the guilt by association games, then YOU are a raving lunatic as well.

When will you go on a shooting spree of a nearby college campus like Amy Bishop did? After all, YOURE a liberal. YOURE a socialist. YOU love Obama. When will YOU shoot up a college campus? See, the guilt-by-association game works both ways, ya twat.

"Nobody invented the FACT that Poplawski was a member of Stromfront - nor that he was familiar with and shared many of Alex Jones' (and your own) views."

YOU share global warming views with Dr. James Hansen [who believes that civilization should be destroyed and wants genocide]. Ahhh, but THAT'S different, isnt it? LOL

"Nobody invented the FACT that Stack flew his plane into the IRS.....for much the same reasons you would perhaps like to do so too."

But yet, he wasnt a Tea Party member and his client list for his software company included a defense contractor with NSA and Homeland Security connections.

By the way, why didnt the IRS buildng in Austin collapse? Hmmmm.

"False flag" can be any type of act of terrorism, or shooting, or event that is staged so that it can be used against the perpetrators' political enemies. While Watson has not proved it was false flag [yet], you have not proven it wasnt. BUT, when you have an event like this and IMMEDIATELY people like YOU begin blaming a particular political ideology [in this case, 9/11 truth] that's one of the biggest signs of a false flag event----immediate blame to an ideology.

Real Truth Online said...

"It isn't "false flag". That's an inversion of reality. The dude was "anti-government" and filled with the paranoia that permeates and characterises Troofers."

Yet that "paranoia" has NEVER been debunked by people like you. Yet, REAL paranoia, like global warming is gleefully accepted by morons like you. Yet when I ASK you things like:

1. Do you use light bulbs?
2. Do you drive a car?
3. Do you use electricity?
4. Do you use a computer [obviously you DO]?

..you blatently IGNORE answering because you KNOW for a FACT that if you answer NO to any or all of them, youre LYING---and if you answer YES to any of all of them, that makes YOU a contributor to global warming, making you a COLOSSAL hypocritical fraud. You claim carbon emissions causes global warming, but yet you still drive your cars, use light bulbs and use electricity. If you BELIEVED your OWN VIEWS, then stop contributing to it!


Not one word from The Last Fraud Left debunking my Mark Potok story under this one. Hmmmm, I wonder why.

the_last_name_left said...

You'd know that if you was American---AND informed.

Ah....of course. My bad.

I take it all back. Forget it?

Larry said...

I love it. Of everything I typed in my 2 posts, all you address is NINE words of my two posts COMBINED.

The TRUE sign of a pathetic, defeated FRAUD: when they refuse to address ANYTHING you say. AGAIN you REFUSE to answer the questions about your car and light bulb usage, you dont address Amy Bishop, James Hansen---and on and on and on.

You are a COMPLETE and utter FRAUD. Everyone who reads these posts will now see CLEARLY that you are too chickenshit to address even 10% of what I say, which proves you are a walking contradiction, a huge fraud and an embarrassment to even yourself.

the_last_name_left said...

LArry - do you think Stack's views on the IRS had anything to do with him flying a plane into it?

Do you think Bedell's view of some vast government conspiracy and 911 being a govt inside job had anything to do with him trying to kill govt employees at Pentagon?

Then we have Von Brunn - the holocaust ant-semite who went psycho at the holocaust museum

Then we have Poplawski - an anti-semitic far-right, cop hating nut who thought there was a vast govt conspiracy.

Not difficult to see how these nutters' views heavily influenced their behaviour. The connection is obvious - it's right in your face. You can't see it? Not very smart then, are you?

And then we have the woman you brought up - some professor who was loopy and worried about her tenureship.

How did her supposed support for Obama contribute to her killing other teachers etc?

No clear connection there in the least.

How did Obama's views or position on anything influence her to kill teachers?

Have teachers/lecturers been demonised by the left in the same way Troofers and the far-right have demonised the american government and state apparatus? Even civil servants.....you and your friends deminise them constantly - accusing them all of being complicit in some vast and evil conspiracy intent on wiping out vast swathes of the population and turning USA into a police state and dictatorship blah blah blah.

You can't see the difference? Hilarious.

Larry said...

“LArry - do you think Stack's views on the IRS had anything to do with him flying a plane into it?”

Well, maybe the fact that Stack was a DEMOCRAT had something to do with TOO! Ever think of that? Are you saying ONLY “right”-wingers hate the IRS? NO Democrats [besides Stack] hate them???

“Do you think Bedell's view of some vast government conspiracy and 911 being a govt inside job had anything to do with him trying to kill govt employees at Pentagon?”

Not if he was educated. Because if you TRULY believe 9-11 was an inside job, you would have enough sense to know that just ANY government employee is responsible for 9-11. If you were educated, you’d know that false flag terror attacks [like 9-11] get carried out by Black Ops, not Pentagon police officers. And why wait NINE years to shoot INNOCENT police officers? You might as well say that Bedell can blame his shooting on the sport of football if he was a football fan. So far, you [or the media] have never given any DIRECT connection between Bedell’s 9-11 views and him shooting cops. You don’t even know what his 9-11 views WERE, let alone the connection! Besides, I love how you defend Amy Bishop’s shooting spree [where she actually KILLED PEOPLE] on her being “looney” but yet you blame Bedell’s shooting [that killed NO ONE] on his 9-11 views when it is now FACT that Bedell was mentally unstable as well---but you don’t defend Bedell and say it was because HE was looney like you do Amy Bishop. It MUST have been Bedell’s 9-11 views to YOU!

Jesus, you’re retarded!

“Then we have Von Brunn - the holocaust ant-semite who went psycho at the holocaust museum”

But you said Amy Bishop went psycho too, and you DEFENDED HER. You keep leaving out [conveniently] that Von Brunn hated FOX news and right wingers like the Bush’s and John McCain. Youre right! He was a RIGHT winger because he hated RIGHT wing people! Hilarious!

“Then we have Poplawski - an anti-semitic far-right, cop hating nut who thought there was a vast govt conspiracy.”

The cops were not at his house because he was an anti-semite or his views on guns or Obama. They were there because of a domestic dispute. It makes NO sense to kill cops if you believe Obama will take your guns away! That’s like sexually molesting your own child if you fear Obama will take away your kids! Makes no sense. But you [or the media] never wants to talk about WHY the cops were there that day.

“The connection is obvious - it's right in your face. You can't see it? Not very smart then, are you?”

Ahhhh but yet you NEVER explain what that connection IS, do you? Even when I continually debunk you about it [which is the VERY reason you delete me on your blog].

Larry said...

“And then we have the woman you brought up - some professor who was loopy and worried about her tenureship.

How did her supposed support for Obama contribute to her killing other teachers etc?”

I’m not the one making the claims that there ARE connections between ideology and going on shooting sprees….YOU are. I was simply bringing up Amy Bishop to clearly illustrate that when the person is a “LEFT” wing person, the “LEFT” never blame it on being “LEFT” even when they commit identical atrocities. YOU “LEFT”-wingers play the guilt-by-association games to go along with your belief in the false left/right paradigm. It’s all a big game to you. You either don’t mean a fucking WORD of what youre saying [which would make you a big FRAUD], or you DO mean what youre saying [which would make you a nutty fraud]. If two different people go on shooting sprees and one believes the IRS is evil and the other supports gay marriage---well, then the one who hated the IRS OBVIOUSLY went nuts because of his beliefs, right??? While the other [who supports gay marriage] is just simply “nutty” and their beliefs have NOTHING to do with the price of tea in China, right?

A “RIGHT”-wingers motivation for killing is always ideology and a “LEFT”-wingers motivation is NEVER ideology, but their mental state, right??

“How did Obama's views or position on anything influence her to kill teachers?”

I never said they did. YOU are the one who plays guilt-by-association games, NOT me. But you say when it’s a “RIGHT”-winger, then their motivation for killing IS their ideologies and who they support!

Stack was a Democrat. Democrats are “LEFT” wing. Why have you NOT blamed the Democratic party for his actions? Hmmmmmmmmmmmm?????

Since when is being anti-government a PARTISAN issue? Youre saying ONLY “right” wingers are anti-government???? Well, Joe Stack is a PERFECT example of that NOT being true! LOL.

“Have teachers/lecturers been demonised by the left in the same way Troofers and the far-right have demonised the american government and state apparatus?”

No, that’s because most teachers and lecturers are liberal. ONLY “far-right” people demonize the government? What planet do you live on?? I guess you never heard of Michael Moore, Keith Olbermann and Bill Maher. They CONSTANTLY criticize the government. Why do you make debunking you SO FUCKING EASY?

“accusing them all of being complicit in some vast and evil conspiracy intent on wiping out vast swathes of the population and turning USA into a police state and dictatorship blah blah blah.”

Hmmmmm. Are you saying Al Gore has NEVER said that global warming would wipe out people? Yet, that is a MAJOR FRAUD and conspiracy. But you are silent on that. Global warming nut James Hansen DIDN’T call for genocide??? Hmmmmmm. Obama’s science czar John Holdren DIDN’T call for population control??? Wow! You really DO live on another planet!

Youre saying there’s no police state???? Really?????????