Sunday, August 2, 2009

Shocking New Birth Certificate Proof Obama Born In Kenya?


If authenticated, document could create constitutional crisis, reaction could be martial law
 
Paul Joseph Watson
Prison Planet.com
August 2, 2009

California attorney Orly Taitz has released a copy of a birth certificate that purports to show Barack Hussein Obama was born in Kenya, which if authenticated would plunge the United States into a constitutional crisis and potentially herald a catastrophic loss of confidence in the legitimacy of the government.

The Obama birth certificate issue has been rumbling on for over a year, with researchers demanding to see a complete birth certificate proving that President Obama was born in Hawaii as he claims, yet none has been forthcoming.

Mainstream media attention on the issue has intensified over the past few weeks, even forcing the White House itself to publicly dismiss the controversy.

However, Taitz’ bombshell discovery blows the whole story wide open and its ramifications could be monumental.

According to World Net Daily, Taitz has filed a new motion in U.S. District Court seeking authentication for the document.

View the document below. Click for enlargements.





"The document lists Obama’s parents as Barack Hussein Obama and Stanley Ann Obama, formerly Stanley Ann Dunham, the birth date as Aug. 4, 1961, and the hospital of birth as Coast General Hospital in Mombasa, Kenya," reports World Net Daily.

"No doctor is listed. But the alleged certificate bears the signature of the deputy registrar of Coast Province, Joshua Simon Oduya. It was allegedly issued as a certified copy of the original in February 1964.

"WND was able to obtain other birth certificates from Kenya for purposes of comparison, and the form of the documents appear to be identical."

Despite the fact that a hoax document similar in nature circulated the Internet last week, World Net Daily reports that the new document "bears none of the obvious traits of a hoax".

The birth certificate was released by an anonymous source who did not want to be named because he fears for his life.

"I filed the motion with the court asking for expedited discovery, which would allow me to start subpoenas and depositions even before Obama and the government responds," Taitz told WND.

"I am asking the judge to give me the power to subpoena the documents from the Kenyan embassy and to require a deposition from Hillary Clinton so they will be forced to authenticate [the birth certificate]."

If proven genuine, the document could herald a constitutional crisis in the United States and lead to Barack Obama being kicked out of office before he’s even able to complete his first year in the White House.

Article 2, Section 1 of the Constitution states, "No person except a natural born citizen… shall be eligible to the office of president."

Obviously the more likely scenario will be that the court will be strong armed into dismissing the document as a counterfeit by the powers that be.

However, the overt preparations for martial law which have intensified since Obama took office have doubtless taken into account the fact that a complete loss of confidence in the legitimacy of the government could foster civil unrest and make a police state crackdown necessary from the perspective of the authorities.

29 comments:

Anonymous said...

QUESTION:

What happens to Judge Sotomayor’s confirmation as Supreme Court Justice if the Constitution’s “natural born citizen” Presidential eligibility requirement is subsequently determined applicable to Barack Obama on the basis of Article 2’s exclusion of dual citizenship birth (doesn’t matter whether Obama born in Hawaii since his dad was Kenyan/British citizen at the time)? It would seem prudent, if not dereliction of Constitutional duty in not so doing, for the United States Senate to defer voting on Judge Sotomayor’s confirmation at the very least until there is determination, now imminent, on standing in Kerchner v. Congress (USDC NJ) on that precise issue (Congressional failure to take up the raised and known constitutional ineligibility question prior to declaring a Presidential winner in the vote of the electoral college). For the full Senate now to proceed to vote to confirm Judge Sotomayor (an otherwise lifetime appointment) before then, would be a knowing and very substantial exacerbation of any inherent Constitutional crisis — compounding the previous Congressional dereliction. That is, the Executive Branch, as well as conceivably all actions of a Congress under a President determined ineligible, would leave the Supreme Court as an essential unfettered remaining Branch of the Federal Government, that is unfettered so long as Mr. Obama’s nominee to the Court is not yet confirmed by the Senate.

Will not one Senator, let alone Republican Senator, raise this issue on the Senate floor? The nation is watching.

Leave a Reply

the_last_name_left said...

a complete loss of confidence in the legitimacy of the government could foster civil unrest and make a police state crackdown necessary from the perspective of the authorities.

Is that what you'd like to happen? Is that why you're pushing this story?

I mean, it does say

Obviously the more likely scenario will be that the court will be strong armed into dismissing the document as a counterfeit by the powers that be.

Seems to me that the article suggests any dismissal of the document will be because it was "forced to do so" - by your "NWO" whatever........

So whether it's dismissed as hoax, or accepted......the upshot seems to be increased suspicion of government. And for you, that's all good, right? Because you suggest even if the courts say it is a hoax document - they're lying. And you and prisonplanet and the rest will harp on about how it isn't a hoax......trying to bring about the loss of legitimacy you suggest would be the responsibility of Obama and co if the document is legitimate.

Round and round you go - with no possible outcome satisfactory to you. And so the thing you seem to be working for most is a complete loss of faith in democratic government, which inevitably would lead to martial law, or total anarchy......

Yeah - well done.

Larry...provider of free speech even to those who condemn ME for deleting ONE comment and then enables moderation on their OWN sight! said...

Gee, I bet is sure is NICE to come to a blog that has FREE SPEECH huh? You come to MY blog where I ALLOW you to speak and yet you exercize Gestapo tactics on YOUR blog and enabled comment moderation??? Wonderful.

Ive asked you OVER and OVER if you have ANY proof of anything you say bout Willis Carto and the only "evidence" you provide is links to another blogspot full of undocumented OPINIONS. I show you fact after fact about WTC 7, even providing FOR YOU a picture of the NON-universal collapse of the McCormick Center and you pass it off as theories, yet you give me ZERO facts about Carto and Im supposed to bow before you and say "All knowing one, thank you for your insight"??????

UNREAL

the_last_name_left said...

You have issues, dude.

Willis Carto runs americanfreepress. Which you link to.

What do you want "proof" of about Willis Carto? That people like you link to his websites? People like Alex Jones print his stories, and link to his websites?

And Larry, you forced me to enable moderation, by your constant use of foul-mouthed insults, your irrelevant comments (spamming), and your refusal to address simple direct questions - like "Are you an architect?"........and "Why do you link to Willis Carto's AFP?"

You deleted several of my civil and relevant comments on day one - and after like 6 comments, whereas I sustained your foul-mouthed spamming and avoidance for over a week. Big difference.

Larry said...

I love how you included many of those twice.

Still not gonna give me PROOF about Carto huh? I want proof about your accusations about him. You just SAYING it isnt PROOF.

I love watching you implode. Its quite funny. By the way, why would you post the names I called you as evidence that its something that I would be against when in my disclaimer (above the chat box right here on my site) it says:

"You may even name-call and be hostile, but please, back up your words with valid opposing remarks"

I allow namecalling as long as the person has PROOF. You HAD no proof, thats why I called you names! (when youre being a moron and an asshole, Im gonna call you that) What have you proven? I mean, OTHER than the fact that I own your blog and made you eat your own words about censorship?

I OWN your blog

Larry said...

Focusing on my language is just your attempt at diverting away from the fact that I schooled you with facts on your blog---that is, when it was a free speech zone---lol.

I own your blog. Youre imploding right before my eyes and Im laughing. How many more stories will you post about me---showcasing the fact that I have gotten on your every nerve and thus you have to take that anger out on me and put it in stories about me? Look at my blog, then look at yours and you tell ME, who is obsessed? LOL

the_last_name_left said...

What "proof" do you demand about Willis Carto?

What is it that you want evidence of?

the_last_name_left said...

This is from a post at STORMFRONT - know what that is Larry?

It's written by Joe Fields. Know who is, Larry?

Joe Fields1488
07-03-2006, 06:25 PM
The American Free Press and Barnes Review are holding a three day conference in Washington, D.C. over the Labor Day weekend.
Registration Friday afternoon ( Sept.1) The conference will run through Sunday, Sept.3rd.
ALL Nationalists and those interested in REAL News and history as opposed to kosher propaganda should attend. For more info, go to The American Free Press website www.americanfreepress.net


I posted about that "conference" on my blog - you ignored it Larry. Now you demand "evidence"?

Another Quote from Stormfront:
Notice the kids have been reading American Free Press - our guys.

LINK


OUR GUYS - GET IT LARRY?

AFP is "OURS" to Stormfront.

Willis Carto = OURS = STORMFRONT

ie RACIST - FASCIST - NEO-NAZI - ANTI-SEMITIC
-----------------

And you link to it, and ask "SO WHAT?"

the_last_name_left said...

Link for Joe Fields posting at Stormfront promoting Carto's AFP conference is
here

Larry said...

A CONFERENCE is PROOF? My god! Theyre having a CONFERENCE! That means theyre Nazi's! I guss only Nazi's have conferences! LOL

Funny how you CLAIM Alex Jones is linked with Nazism when PP continually posts ANTI-Nazism stories!! My latest post is an ANTI Nazism story!

Carto is like 92 year old and he's sitting back running a blog???? LOL

Funny how I was never on YOUR side, but you was once on MINE.

Do I still OWN your blog??? You claim youre AGAINST Nazi's but YOUR BLOG is CENSORED---Nazi-style!! LOL

Larry said...

There's anti-semiticism in the BIBLE. Your point???

the_last_name_left said...

Larry: A CONFERENCE is PROOF? My god! Theyre having a CONFERENCE! That means theyre Nazi's! I guss only Nazi's have conferences! LOL

No, Larry.

As explained, it's a conference for Willis Carto's AmericanFreePress and The Barnes Review. (The Barnes Review is a holocaust denial publication.)

The announcement is in Stormfront - the largest NEO-NAZI website in the world.

The announcement was made by joe Fields.

.....NAZI activist JOE FIELDS, an associate of NAZI PARTY chieftain Stan Witek and Tom
Metzger of WAR (White Aryan Resistance). Fields is, in fact, a
member of the party's National Executive Committee.


LINK


The same Joe Fields was announcer at the AFP conference - and he promoted it at Stormfront.

So, you can squirm, Larry - but it very clearly IS a nazi affair - not just any old conference as you pretend.

And you link to AFP, Larry. And You wrote for Alex Jones, and publish his stuff here. Alex Jones publishes AFP stuff, and even employs Big Jim Tucker (AFP founder along with Willis Carto).

That makes you pretty tight with a load of Nazis, Larry?

Anonymous said...

lol.larry just schooled another asshole. last name left is now larrys bitch. larry owns him. another blog spot larry owns. take off moderation ass wipe.

the_last_name_left said...

Larry talks to himself.......lol

Larry said...

I noticed you conveniently ignored the other threads. Hey Turd---when are you going to write a story BY YOURSELF????? Your site should be called www.copy-and-paste.blogspot.com

the_last_name_left said...

This story, like 150 others here is a copy-paste from Prisonplanet.

TRUE or FALSE? (true, Larry)

Previously you accused me of writing nothing but my own opinion.

Now you accuse me of copy-pasting.

Get your argument straight, larry?

the_last_name_left said...

Larry's blog: Articles by Paul Watson:

# Paul Joseph Watson (141)

LOL

Larry said...

Oh brother, youre a moron. I copy stories from others, yes, but look right above the date. What do you see? Oh my! I see the AUTHORS name! Gee, how about that? I give the author the CREDIT for it.
You, on the other hand, post from wikipedia and do NOT give credit to wikipedia. For example: your post titled "Blackshirts"-----100% VERBATIM from wikipedia and is there a link to wikipedia? NOPE. Do you mention its from wikipedia? NOPE.

I have also written 273 articles of MY OWN. Ive written more stories than you have HITS on your site!

How many stories have YOU written BY YOURSELF? I count ZERO.

Real Truth Online said...

"Previously you accused me of writing nothing but my own opinion.

Now you accuse me of copy-pasting.

Get your argument straight, larry?"

No links, videos or documented resarch IS just OPINION. Whether you copy and paste from someone else who ALSO does not provide links, videos or documented facts doesnt make it FACTS. Its STILL opinion whether YOU write it yourself with no links or sources or you copy it from someone with no links or sources. Paul Watson's articles give links out the wazoo. my articles give links out the wazoo.

Posting someone ELSE's work is not synonymous with posting FACTS---it can still all fall under OPINION. Paul Watson's articles are factual. He provides MUCH evidence. My articles are factual.

There's no authors names under MANY of your stories. I know they're copied because there's no way you sat down a wrote those incredibly long posts--and then NOT put your name on them.

You coped from wikipedia and gave no credit to wikipedia ("Blackshirts" post). I wonder how many OTHERS are direct C&P jobs that you pass off as your OWN.

There's nothing wrong with using anothers' story, as long as you give the writer CREDIT and it provides FACTS and documented research. The fact that I even have to TELL you this means youre a walking blob of braindead matter.

the_last_name_left said...

Where don't I give credit for a post other than my own??

Find one? If i've left out a credit for someone else's work, it's a mistake. Anything not credited is mine. I don't think it's especially good, but it is all mine.

And see if you can find your fallacy in that post? I'll give you a clue:

L: Paul Watson's articles give links out the wazoo. my articles give links out the wazoo.

+

L: copy and paste from someone else who ALSO does not provide links, videos or documented facts doesnt make it FACTS.

Look at watson's spurious article on CCTV being installed in UK homes. Absolute rubbish. He took false claims from the Daily Express, and published them as fact. No-one at prisonplanet bothered to admit it is bullshit. they never report the minister involved saying "It's rubbish!" - they don't report the existing projects don't use CCTV, and there's intention of using CCTV.

But Watson has a LINK to it, and the entire article is based upon it.

Worthless.

If you can find a single "untruth" in anything at my site (apart from the prisonplanet rubbish i comment on) I'd like to know - and I'll address it.

Larry said...

"Find one? If i've left out a credit for someone else's work, it's a mistake. Anything not credited is mine. I don't think it's especially good, but it is all mine"

Anything not credited is YOURS huh? The "Blackshirts" posts is UNCREDITED and its straight from wikipedia and yet I dont see a link to wikipedia anywhere. LIAR.

Why would any writer post a story and not put his name on it? Embarrassed of your own articles? Or are you afraid if someone catches you in a LIE they wont be able to expose you by name???

FRAUD

the_last_name_left said...

LOL - a paragraph - from wiki - uncredited. So what?

That's it, huh? The rest is fine then, right? lol

Anyway - back to the issue?

the prisonplanet article you have copy-pasted here claims if the birth cert is called a fraud, then the court must have been leant upon - by the NWO whatever. If the birth cert is considered genuine, then the NWO will introduce martial law, blah blah blah.

You notice that nowhere does that include the option that Obama is legitimately head of state?

You missed that one? And that's your entire purpose isn't it? To undermine government, no matter the facts? Just like the nazis sought to undermine Weimar and liberal democracy?

Larry said...

"LOL - a paragraph - from wiki - uncredited. So what?

That's it, huh? The rest is fine then, right? lol"

Actually it was the ENTIRE post straight from Wikipedia----not just "a paragraph". Again, ANOTHER lie.

Even if it was JUST a paragraph, you STILL credit even PORTIONS---any REAL writer knows that. Ah, but then again, look who Im talking to!

By the way, Ive asked like 15 ties now----when am I getting a link or photo of a building that suffered a universal collapse as a result of fires and damage OTHER than WTC 7?? How much longer will you ignre that?

the_last_name_left said...

Historical Survey of Multi-Story Building Collapses Due to Fire
by
Beitel, J. J., Hughes Associates, Inc
Iwankiw, N. R., Hughes Associates, Inc

-snip-

At least four of these fire-induced collapses occurred during construction or
renovations, when the usual architectural, structural and fire protection functions were
incomplete or temporarily disrupted. Partial collapses (14 events) were the most frequent
occurrences, and the three World Trade Center complete collapses dominated the full
collapse event total of eight cases. Office and residential were the primary occupancy
types in these 20 buildings, as would be expected in multi-story construction.

This data demonstrated that buildings of all types of construction and
occupancies, in North America, and abroad, are susceptible to fire-induced collapse,

particularly older buildings. The annual fire occurrences in the US, according to Hall,
(2001), exceeded 10,000 in buildings that were 7-stories or taller. Those that were
undergoing repairs or renovations appeared to further increase the fire and collapse risk.
If the fire could not be quickly contained and suppressed by sprinklers, firefighters, or
other fire protection measures, it posed a serious life safety hazard for any of the building
occupants present. Continued fire spread can lead to a partial or total collapse in a multi-
story building, compounding occupant losses, as in some of the cases described above.


LINK


Professionals, Larry.

Bet they're not as qualified an architect as you, heh, Larry?

Somehow I doubt that will matter to you, all of a sudden.

the_last_name_left said...


LINK


Check out that building collapse.

Yes, it's obviously only partial, and yes, it is obviously mostly concrete.

However, the point is - where are the substantial fires that you would demand be obviously present before such a collapse could possibly happen? They aren't there. The building looks like it has minimal fire. Nevertheless it collapses.

And the collapse, such as it is - partial - looks very similar to that of WTC 1,2 and 7. Look at the smoke etc?

We can definitely conclude that the absence of obvious, raging fires being clearly visible does not preclude possibility of collapse.

Larry said...

I find it interesting that every single time you post your "evidence", it actully supports what I say more than what YOU say!

I watched the video. I find t ineresting that 1) the building is NOT a UNIVERSAL collpse. (im beginning to think you have NO IDEA what a universal collapse is since BOTH of your examples so far have NOT been universal)

and 2) the building in your video actually collapses THE VERY WAY WTC 7 SHOULD HAVE COLLAPSED if it was because of fires and damage!!!

3) The building is ONLY a partial collapse----which can NOT be used as example of why WTC 7 collapsed THE WAY IT DID. In your video, notice how the section collapsing actually crumbles ad doesnt fall straight down symmetrically. If WTC 7 fell due to fires and damage as you claim, you would see that building crumble as well, but you dont. Its a perfect symmetrical, straight down collapse.

So, Turd, thank you once AGAIN for providing evidence that actually gives MORE credence to my views of WTC 7.

Any more evidence that actually supports MY views? You are a COMPLETE MORON.

rob said...

larry youve schooled another person again. plus you own his site our he would end comment ,moderation. hes your bitch larry. you own him. larry you made this guy look like a complete jackass again.

Anonymous said...

schol sum more peepul larry! you iz king of the hill! you showz em - they all you bitches.

nahidworld said...

thank you once AGAIN for providing evidence that actually gives MORE credence to my views of WTC 7.
Birthcertificate