Saturday, August 29, 2009

Liberals: Painted Obama face is “racist”, but painted faces of conservatives are “A-OK”


The hypocrisy of liberals far outweighs the hypocrisy of conservatives

by Larry Simons
August 29, 2009

Trust me. I am not a “right-wing” conservative. Nobody hated Bush and his criminal clan more than I did. One doesn’t have to be supportive of a particular ideology to see the blatant hypocrisy of liberals in dealing with the image of Barack Obama. Their clear message: If you mock or paint the faces of conservatives, that’s deserving and accepted. If you do it to Barack Obama, you’re a racist.

Here’s liberal website Crooks and Liars showing Republican Michael Steele as a clown (also above). Shown in the photo above is an image of George W. Bush as the Joker. These images are perfectly acceptable to the mainstream media and you never really heard about the Bush Joker picture, did you? But, Obama painted as the Joker? You get these stories from the Washington Post and MSNBC crying racism. It’s really unbelievable.

Also posted at Prison Planet, here.

30 comments:

Nancy Evans said...

Well said, Larry. It has always been about the blatant hypocrisy to me. Take a look at all the hateful depictions of Bush from Zomblog's retrospective. I link to them in my post. http://thereluctantconspiracytheorist.blogspot.com/2009/08/bush-as-hitler-remember-when.html

If it is OK for people to do this to Bush, then it is OK to do this to Obama. It is not about race, it's about his politics.

Anonymous said...

another great post larry.

Anonymous said...

this is from the comments section on prison planet:

# Larry will never get it Says:
August 31st, 2009 at 10:36 am

Apparently you morons dont know the history of blackface. Fucking idiots discredit yourselves and dont even realize it. Priceless. And I should have known this fool LArry still doesnt get it. Im CONSERVATIVE to the bone and I get it. Still using your labels huh Larry you tool? CLASSIC NWO tactic, use labels and get people to attack each other instead of them. You do the elites work for them Larry.

Reply
# Larry will never get it Says:
August 31st, 2009 at 10:38 am

Larry, your bullshit disclaimer doesnt change the fact that you are misusing and abusing these terms EXACTLY like the elites and MSM want you to. You would fit right in on Rushs show or maybe on CNN.

Reply
# Larry will never get it Says:
August 31st, 2009 at 10:39 am

C&L is not liberal, its a leftwing gatekeeper, there is a difference. Just like Little Green Footballs is not an actual conservative site, but a rightwing gatekeeping neocon site. Larry, you need to grow up and stop being a tool by misusing these terms.

Dont shoot the messenger.

Larry said...

Yeah and those 3 comments were all left within a 3 minute time frame. In other words: ALL from YOU. So, C & L is a CONSERVATIVE site??? Hmmm, I didnt know that. Your site have more than 0.7 hits a day yet? LL

Anonymous said...

Hey Larry, why do all your articles bash "liberals"? Do you even know what that word means? Why no articles with "conservative says" in the title? Do you work for the RNC? You come off as a rightwing hack who pretends to dislike both parties while shilling for one(the Republican party). Just telling you how you look. And really? "Liberals" are more hypocritical than "conservatives"? Larry, im a conservative but that comment is just the kind of thing that lends credence to the theory that you're a rightwing hack. Self professed "conservatives" are oplenty hypocritical, or perhaps you forgot all of that Republican and "conservative" support for the war etc.

Anonymous said...

And no, C&L is a gatekeeper site. Does everything have to be either "liberal" or "conservative" with you? Why the NEED to use these now meaningless labels? At least use the term neoliberal as C&L and Obama are not genuine liberals. You're a damn fool if you feel the need to use corporate media tactics of labeling all and putting us into neat little categories though.

Anonymous said...

Hey Larry, you think all liberals are exactly the same right? Based on many of your article titles I can only conclude yes, you think ALL liberals are exactly the same. (How Fox News-ish of you). How about conservatives? I see you dont have articles bashing them much, if at all, but do you think they are ALL the same too? You're being a useful idiot for the Fox/Limbaugh/BEck set.

Anonymous said...

So Larry, can I see the link to one of your stories that blares "CONSERVATIVE BECK SAYS" or "CONSERVATIVE Malkin says" or "CONSERVATIVE DICK CHENEY says" in the title? Thanks in advance. I'll be waiting. And waiting. Way to continually miss the point....

Anonymous said...

You use the word liberal in exactly the same manner as Rush Limbuagh. He would be proud of you. Call Obama supporters Obama supporters you fucking fool.Do you call Cheney supporters "conservative"? And AGAIN, do you have any articles saying Cheney or Malkin or Hannity etc. are CONSERVATIVE in the title? I'll be waiting......(you're so slow you dont even realize you are doing the MSM's dirty work for them. Divide and Conquer Larry, you fucking hypocritical fool).

Real Truth Online said...

ALL my articles bash liberals??? REALLY? why would you condemn me for using that word when YOU just used it in your first sentence? LOL. Im "shilling" for Repubicans?? REALLY? Have you even bothered to notice the many, many articles I write AGAINST O' Reilly, Glenn Beck, ANY Bush, Hannity, Coulter, Limbaugh, and the pastor Steve Anderson? I bash MANY more, I just dont feel like listing them ALL here right now. Ive bashed Sarah Palin and McCain many times too---why no mention of that?

The reason why I use the word "liberal" is to show the irony that anything would offend them, since they are supposed to be the tolerant group.

What word SHOULD I use for supporters of Obama? I cant use liberal or left wing--so what word would YOU use? By the way, I call people what THEY call themselves, why do I have to keep saying this?

"I see you dont have articles bashing them much, if at all, but do you think they are ALL the same too?"

Then you must have only been looking at my site for the last 3 days. Go to the labels section at the bottom, look up:

Hannity
O' Reilly
Coulter
Beck
George W Bush
Bush Sr
Palin
McCain
Gingrich
Limbaugh
Rick Santorum
Bill Kristol
Cheney
Huckabee
Romney
Giuliani
Condi Rice
Rumsfeld

and you tell me if youve never seen me bash them "hardly at all" and I will tell you youre either blind, stupid or retarded, or all 3. Find ONE positive article about ANY of the names above----you CANT.

Real Truth Online said...

Thats because its not shocking that something would upset a "conservative"---EVERYTHING pisses them off. A "liberal" is supposed to be tolerant and well....LIBERAL. So, when I use the word "liberal", Im basically saying "If theyre so liberal, why does this upset them?"

Oh, thanks...Malkin is another one Ive based repeatedly...add her to my list above.

Anonymous said...

Holy shit Larry, you even buy into the "birther" disinfo? No WONDER you use MSM tactics by bashing what you perceive as "liberals". Disclaimer or not, you come off as a rabid Glenn Beck/Hannity acolyte. Obama sucks, he should be attacked HARD but clowns like you only discredit legit Obama critics. Obama loves you almost as much as Limbaugh does.

Real Truth Online said...

Its actually my way of bashing them MORE when I DONT use the word "conservative" in my titles because its already a given that they will be pissed about something. Using the word "conservative" in my titles would be like using the word "Christian" in a heading that says: "Christian Pat Roberston wants gays killed". Everyone knows who Robertson is, why say "Christian"? Why be redundant and say "Christian" and "Pat Roberston"? Thats like saying "nut" "nut".

Real Truth Online said...

Never said I "buy into it", but why cant QUESTIONS be asked about it? Ive even SPECIFICALLY said in my very FEW articles about that issue "Im not sure where I stand on this issue", but I 100% support ASKING QUESTIONS. What I despise is when people on TV act like you should just accept things that are spoon fed to you. Find ONE story on my site where I said I FULLY BELIEVE that Obama is NOT a US citizen. Hell, Im a stronger believer that John McCain was not eligible to be President. Notice I said "not eligible" and NOT "not a US citizen" since being a US citizen is NOT ENOUGH to make one eligible for the presidency.

Anonymous said...

Orly Taitz is an Israeli mole. google her and ISrael and get educated Larry. You've been fooled on the "birther" disinfo and you are a tool for using "liberal' to bash and making a HUGE BULLSHIT excuse in expalining why you dont use "conservative" in a similar manner. Admit it tool, you are a Limbaugh-esque tool. And apparently you dont even know it. I'll believe you're not a useful idiot when you stop having a double standard like a typical MSM tool and when you use "conservative" to describe neocons and fake conservatives like you use "liberal" to describe fakke liberals and gatekeepers. Your double standard has been exposed. Need I go back and list all the titles of your articles saying "liberal" this and "leftwing" that while your articles on "rightwingers" dont have the same hack MSM labels? And I didnt sayall your articles bash "liberals", jsut that you seem to think all "liberals" are the same since you use that term(and leftwing) to describe people but NEVER use "conservative" or "rightwing" in them. Exposed. Useful idiot hack.

Larry said...

So, did you find ONE positive story that I wrote about the people i mentioned above?

I gave you the reason why I use the word "liberal". If you cant read, thats your problem, shithead. Im not repeating myself.

Anonymous said...

You hypocrite, im still waiting, waiting, so i'll post this again:

Anonymous said...

So Larry, can I see the link to one of your stories that blares "CONSERVATIVE BECK SAYS" or "CONSERVATIVE Malkin says" or "CONSERVATIVE DICK CHENEY says" in the title? Thanks in advance. I'll be waiting. And waiting. Way to continually miss the point....
September 1, 2009 8:26:00 AM EDT
Anonymous said...

You use the word liberal in exactly the same manner as Rush Limbuagh. He would be proud of you. Call Obama supporters Obama supporters you fucking fool.Do you call Cheney supporters "conservative"? And AGAIN, do you have any articles saying Cheney or Malkin or Hannity etc. are CONSERVATIVE in the title? I'll be waiting......(you're so slow you dont even realize you are doing the MSM's dirty work for them. Divide and Conquer Larry, you fucking hypocritical fool).
September 1, 2009 8:30:00 AM EDT

Anonymous said...

Your reason was pure hypocrisy. It exposed you as a double standard employing MSM tactic using tool. Try again.

Larry said...

One? OK,here you go:

http://realtruthonline.blogspot.com/2007/03/my-top-10-list-of-conservative-hate.html

Whats your REAL beef here? That I dont use "conservative" in the TITLE or I never say it at all?
Because I have news for you: I say "conservative _______ (fill in the blank) ALL the time in my stories? Admit it: This is just about the TITLES, isnt it?

Larry said...

disregard the ? after "ALL the time in my stories."

Anonymous said...

Admit it Larry, you have been thoroughly exposed as a useful idiot for the BEck/Hannity set, even while you rail against the likes of them. YOu cant even give a single reason why you feel the need to post "LIBERAL LEFTWING" in your titles describing FAKE liberals while you fail to do the same with fake conservatives and neocons. Click the PP link, you got owned in your own thread. Again, Rush Limbuagh would be so proud of you. Or is this just about web hits? Is rthis the only way to draw in the Fox News crowd, by railing against "liberals" in your titles/stories? Pure hackery.

Larry said...

"while you fail to do the same with fake conservatives and neocons."

Hey buttfuck, I GAVE you a link where I used "conservative". You said "name ONE", and I did. Youre the one who IGNORES questions. I asked YOU:

"Whats your REAL beef here? That I dont use "conservative" in the TITLE or I never say it at all?
Because I have news for you: I say "conservative _______ (fill in the blank) ALL the time in my stories? Admit it: This is just about the TITLES, isnt it?"

and naturally, it was IGNORED. So, fuck off liberal.

Larry said...

Continued refusal to answer my questions will get your ass deleted, because a refusal to answer questions is NOT a debate, its being a provocateur, and I delete provocateurs.

Anonymous said...

You are censoring now? Screen grab. You sure you wanna stoop THIS low LArry? First you get owned on your own board and then you stoop to censorship? Thus proving my point about you. Good job. You've shown your true colors.

Anonymous said...

"So, fuck off liberal."-Larry

Way to show your true colors there Dittohead, but im not liberal(well, I am on some social issues but overall im atually not), I just dont like tools who use MSM inspired labels like hack idiots. And one title is all you could come up with? Kind of proves my point for me doesnt it? ANyway, its wrong to use BOTH "liberal" and "conservative" in hack ways like you do. It just so happens you do it much more with the word "liberal" as does the MSM in general. Makes it easier to slam anti-war people. You can tell who you're inspired by, knowingly or not.

Larry said...

"Makes it easier to slam anti-war people."

Hey douchebag-----I'M AN ANTI-WAR PERSON!!!

Im inspired by the CONSTUTUTION, and that's IT.

Read my disclaimer above the post box----if you are here JUST to be a provocateur, you will be deleted. This is for debate and expressing views---meaning if I ask a question---answer it, and I will do likewise. So far, after TWO times telling you that you ignored my question, you have STILL ignored it. Heres the question a THIRD TIME. If you continue to ignore it, then you are a provocateur and you will be deleted.

""Whats your REAL beef here? That I dont use "conservative" in the TITLE or I never say it at all?
Because I have news for you: I say "conservative _______ (fill in the blank) ALL the time in my stories? Admit it: This is just about the TITLES, isnt it?"

By the way, Ive studied Leo Strauss' teachings. If you were a REAL liberal, that means you are a Neo-con, because all a Neo-con is is a NEW conservative, and new conservatives come from the old liberal---and they basically HATE liberty.

Anonymous said...

If you're anti-war(I gather you are by looking at your site), then as was said, you are helping the pro-war forces by misusing and overusing the word "liberal" like a typical MSM hack idiot. You are what you criticize in many ways.

Anonymous said...

not once was has he answered your question larry. he cant debunk nor refute any of your claims. hell this pile of shit isnt even american.

Anonymous said...

Im not evenn american? Dumb fuck, you know that plays into exactly what im saying right? I criticize and im all of a sudden not american to you? How Fox News of you. Thanks for making my point for me. You see lArry, this is the type of people you cater to with your phony MSM labeling. People who question ones patriotism, or even if they are american because of criticisms. Remind you of the last 8 years?

Anonymous said...

hey anon. you just proved larrys point again. rufutes 0. debunks 0. get over yourself and try to prove something once.