Saturday, May 31, 2008

The REAL terrorists

The Neo-cons want terror attacks…..very, very badly

by Larry Simons
May 31, 2008

Newt Gingrich
(former Speaker of The House)

"This is ... one of the great tragedies of the Bush administration," Gingrich continued. "The more successful they've been at intercepting and stopping bad guys, the less proof there is that we're in danger. And therefore, the better they've done at making sure there isn't an attack, the easier it is to say, 'Well, there never was going to be an attack anyway.' And it's almost like they should every once in a while have allowed an attack to get through just to remind us". (April, 2008)

Donald Rumsfeld
(Former Secretary of Defense)

"That's what I was just going to say. This President's pretty much a victim of success. We haven't had an attack in five years. The perception of the threat is so low in this society that it's not surprising that the behavior pattern reflects a low threat assessment. The same thing's in Europe, there's a low threat perception. The correction for that, I suppose, is an attack. And when that happens, then everyone gets energized for another [inaudible] and it's a shame we don't have the maturity to recognize the seriousness of the threats...the lethality, the carnage, that can be imposed on our society is so real and so present and so serious that you'd think we'd be able to understand it, but as a society, the longer you get away from 9/11, the less...the less..." (December, 2006)

Stu Bykofsky
(Columnist, Philadelphia Daily News)

"One month from The Anniversary, I'm thinking another 9/11 would help America," laments Stu Bykofsky in his Philadelphia Daily News column.

"Remember the community of outrage and national resolve? America had not been so united since the first Day of Infamy - 12/7/41. We knew who the enemy was then. America's fabric is pulling apart like a cheap sweater. What would sew us back together? Another 9/11 attack." (August, 2007)

Lt. Col. Doug Delaney
(chair of the war studies program at the Royal Military College in Kingston, Ontario)

"The key to bolstering Western resolve is another terrorist attack like 9/11 or the London transit bombings of two years ago." (July, 2007)

Rick Santorum
(former PA Senator)

"Between now and November, a lot of things are going to happen, and I believe that by this time next year, the American public’s going to have a very different view of this war, and it will be because, I think, of some unfortunate events, that like we’re seeing unfold in the UK. But I think the American public’s going to have a very different view." (July, 2007)

Dennis Milligan
(chairman of the Arkansas Republican Party)

"At the end of the day, I believe fully the president is doing the right thing, and I think all we need is some attacks on American soil like we had on [Sept. 11, 2001]," (June, 2007)

I just have one thing to say to you Gingrich, Rumsfeld, Bykofsky, Milligan, Santorum and Delaney: Since you want terror attacks so badly, sacrifice yourselves by hopping aboard a plane and plowing it into one of your houses. Sacrifice YOUR lives and YOUR property and leave the rest of us SANE Americans alone!

No one will miss you

Wednesday, May 28, 2008

Memo To Corporate Media: Anyone Can Dress Up As An Arab Terrorist & Fake An Al-Qaeda Tape

America's press whores gear up for another summer of fearmongering with dubious "Al-Qaeda fan" WMD video

Paul Joseph Watson
Prison Planet
May 28, 2008

Nearly four years after Benjamin Vanderford hoodwinked the global media by manufacturing a fake Al-Qaeda beheading tape, America's corporate press whores are once again gearing up to fearmonger about the prospect of mushroom clouds over American cities by instantly ascribing gospel status to a dubious "Al-Qaeda fan" Internet videotape that encourages the use of WMD in a terrorist attack.

"Intelligence and law enforcement sources tell ABC News they are expecting al Qaeda supporters will post a new video on the Internet in the next 24 hours, calling for what one source said is "jihadists to use biological, chemical and nuclear weapons to attack the West," according to the report.

"There have been several reports that al Qaeda will release a new message calling for the use of weapons of mass destruction (WMD) against civilians," FBI spokesman Richard Kolko told ABC News in an e-mail.

Since the dubious series of beheading videos, which coincidentally came to a stop when one of our readers managed to expose the ludicrousness of accepting such propaganda at face value by hoodwinking the world media with a fake beheading tape, "Al-Qaeda" has been resigned to spreading its message through Mossad agents like Adam Pearlman and alleged sketchy Bin Laden audio recordings.

It was back in August 2004 that 22-year-old aspiring video game designer Benjamin Vanderford posted a 55 second clip on the Internet filmed at his friend's house which depicted himself being crudely beheaded while fake blood spurted for visual effect. Vanderford's buddy dressed up like the infamous Abu Musab al-Zarqawi, barked out a template terrorist screed, and the press bought it hook, line and sinker.

The corporate media lapped up the phony tape and within hours of it being uploaded serious analysts on Fox News were citing the footage as further evidence to prove we were in a war against bloodthirsty terrorists.

Vanderford said he made the tape "to just make a statement on these type of videos and how easily they can be faked."

Vanderford single-handedly proved that anyone in the world can dress up as an Arab terrorist, fake a beheading scene or a speech, upload it to the Internet, and have the global media obsessing about the deadly threat of Al-Qaeda within hours.

Benjamin Vanderford's "Abu Musab al-Zarqawi Slaughters an American" hoax was accepted at face value by a feverish corporate media who instantly afforded credence to the fraud.

The latest "Al-Qaeda WMD" sideshow is no different. This could have been made by the tooth fairy for all the corporate media cares. It fills up the headlines, it attracts viewers and it pleases their military-industrial complex sponsors who make a killing out of artificially inflating the scope of the phantom war on terror for increased weapons sales and fighter jets.

The lesson that the Internet is an anonymous free-for-all medium has still not been learned four years later as the media seizes upon the latest offering which provides them with an ample opportunity to fearmonger about biological attacks turning American cities into quarantine camps this summer.

One wonders if the new tape will feature original rhetoric or whether it will just be lifted almost entirely from a satirical spoof website, as was the case with the previous "Al-Qaeda tape".

You know it's bad when even IntelCenter, the Pentagon front group that routinely releases fake "Al-Qaeda" propaganda videos of Bin Laden speeches cobbled together from 5-year-old footage, is denouncing the new tape as inconsequential.

"Supporter videos are made by fans or supporters who may not have ever had any contact with a real terrorist," IntelCenter's CEO Ben Venzke told ABC News. "These videos almost always are comprised of old video footage that is edited together to make a new video." (Takes one to know one, Ben!)

"Considering them so would be the equivalent of considering a 10-year-old's homemade fan video of his favorite sports team to be an official team message," Venzke said. "IntelCenter is not aware of any new imminent message by al-Qaeda or any other leading jihadist group in audio or video form that will call for the use of WMD against civilians."

Venzke makes a good point but he might just be upset that the "Al-Qaeda fan" didn't go through his military-industrial complex front in releasing the tape.

If you're wondering why the boys at IntelCenter always know when an "Al-Qaeda" video is set to be released two days before it pops up, the answer is simple - they are manufacturing the entire fraud.

Similar to the need to create a PR buzz before the release of a new DVD or a movie, IntelCenter makes sure its customers know ahead of time in order to cash in on a lucrative scheme that services client subscribers from governments and intelligence agencies around the world.

The franchise of hawking terrorist propaganda is no doubt a multi-million dollar cash cow, which is why Venzke seems upset that he's not got his hand in the pie on this one, but money isn't the only agenda behind IntelCenter's operation.

As we have exhaustively documented, Intelcenter is an offshoot of IDEFENSE, which was staffed by a senior military psy-op intelligence officer Jim Melnick, who has worked directly for Donald Rumsfeld. The organization released the "laughing hijackers" tape and claimed it was an Al-Qaeda video, despite the fact that the footage was obtained by a "security agency" at a 2000 Bin Laden speech.

IntelCenter was recently caught adding its logo to a tape at the same time as Al-Qaeda's so-called media arm As-Sahab added its logo, proving the two organizations were one and the same.
The Pakistani based Al-Qaeda group Jundullah, formerly headed by the alleged mastermind of 9/11, an organization which enjoys the funding, support and protection of the CIA, also produces propaganda tapes and literature for As-Sahab and in turn IntelCenter.

Perhaps the latest Al-Qaeda-WMD fraud denotes that IntelCenter has some good old fashioned competition on its hands in the emerging market of terrorist propaganda tapes, but for the rest of us it's another painful reminder that the corporate media has abandoned any pretense of investigative journalism in favor of acting as a mere relay circuit for Neo-Con black propaganda.

Tuesday, May 27, 2008

Vincent Bugliosi Wants Bush Charged with Murder

Bugliosi: George Bush has gotten away with murder – thousands of murders..and no one is doing anything about it. The American people can’t let him do this

Corporate Crime Reporter
May 22, 2008

Vincent Bugliosi – who in the early 1970s successfully prosecuted Charles Manson for the murder of Sharon Tate and six others – lays out his case against Bush in The Prosecution of George W. Bush for Murder (Perseus Books, 2008).

The book will hit book stores next week – Tuesday May 27, 2008.

“My motivation for writing this book is simple – to bring about justice,” Bugliosi says in a video posted on the book’s web site (

“George Bush has gotten away with murder – thousands of murders,” Bugliosi says. “And no one is doing anything about it. The American people can’t let him do this.”

Bugliosi wants one or more of the fifty state attorneys general or one of the nation’s hundreds of district attorneys to step up and prosecute Bush for murder.

“I have set forth in my book the jurisdictional basis for the Attorney General in each of the fifty states – plus the hundreds upon hundreds of district attorneys in counties within the states – to prosecute George Bush for the murders of any soldier or soldiers from their state or county who were killed in Iraq fighting George Bush’s war,” Bugliosi says in the video on his web site.

“I don’t think it is too unreasonable to believe that at least one prosecutor out there in America – maybe many more – will be courageous enough to say – this is the United States of America. And in America no one is above the law. George Bush has gotten away with murder. No one is doing anything about it. And maybe this book will change that.”

Bugliosi argues that Bush misled the nation into a war that has killed more than 4,000 Americans.

At the center of Bugliosi’s indictment of Bush is a October 7, 2002 speech to the nation in which Bush claims that Saddam Hussein was a great danger to this nation either by attacking us with his weapons of mass destruction, or giving these weapons to some terrorist group.

“And he said – the attack could happen on any given day – meaning the threat was imminent,” Bugliosi says.

“The only problem for George Bush – and if he were prosecuted, there is no way he could get around this – is that on October 1, 2002, six days earlier, the CIA sent George Bush its 2002 National Intelligence Estimate, a classified top secret report.

Page eight clearly and unequivocally says that Saddam Hussein was not an imminent threat to the security of this country. In fact, the report says that Hussein would only use whatever weapons of mass destruction he had against us if he feared that America was about to attack him.”

“We know that Bush was telling millions upon millions of unsuspecting Americans exactly the opposite of what his own CIA was telling him,” Bugliosi said. “We know that George Bush took this nation to war on a lie. Who is going to pay for all of this? Someone has to pay. And the person who has to pay obviously is directly responsible for all of the death horror and suffering. And that person is George W. Bush.”

“The majority of the American people probably are going to find it difficult to accept that the President of the United States, the most powerful man on earth, would engage in conduct that smacks of such great criminality. You just don’t expect something like this from an American president. However, I’m very confident that once they read the book, they will be overwhelmed by the evidence against Bush. They will be convinced that he is guilty of murder and should be prosecuted. In the book, I lay out the legal architecture for the case against Bush, all of the evidence of the guilt against Bush and the jurisdiction to prosecute him. I even set forth proposed cross-examination questions of him if he takes the witness stand at trial.”

As a state prosecutor in Los Angeles, Bugliosi prosecuted Charles Manson and members of his “family” for the 1969 murders of Sharon Tate and six others.

Bugliosi says he lost only one of the 106 felony cases he tried as a prosecutor. He says he won 21 out of 21 murder cases.

He is the author of Helter Skelter – the best-selling book on the Manson trial.

Monday, May 26, 2008

How dare you ask ME to remember the war dead today, Mr. Bush, when you have murdered 4,082 of them!

Murderer-in-chief calls for “moment of remembrance” for the 4,082 troops he has murdered

by Larry Simons
May 26, 2008

President Bush will lay a wreath at Arlington Cemetery's Tomb of the Unknowns for one last time today on Memorial Day. For the last time….GOOD. But it won’t matter. Whoever occupies the White House in 7 months will just take Bush’s place in laying down more wreaths while they continue to add to the number of war dead by continuing this illegal occupation of Iraq.

I can hear the loony right-wingers now. “Don’t politicize this day to remember our war dead!”. Yeah, that’s right. I’m the bastard for “politicizing” today, when George W. Bush has sent 4,082 fathers, mothers, sisters, brothers, sons and daughters to their deaths in an illegal, undeclared war.

How dare you ask ME to remember the dead today, Mr. Bush, you bastard! You have killed over 4,000 troops and over 1 million innocent Iraqis and you ask ME to remember our fallen when for 5 years now I have been protesting this war and calling for it to end so the troops can come home ALIVE? FUCK YOU, Mr. Bush!

You care NOTHING about our troops. They are pawns to you, Mr. Bush; casualties for your oil war and profiteering. While you play golf, more troops die. While you get the privilege of watching YOUR kids get married, more troops die. FUCK YOU for even implying that I don’t remember or honor these brave troops every day I live. You, on the other hand, do not give a 2-cent fuck about them….ANY of them. I am an agnostic about God, but I sure hope he exists so you can burn in hell for eternity.

You don’t even give a fuck about the ones LIVING since you cut their benefits and threaten to veto GI bills. Your clone McCain will continue your treacherous actions against our troops if you are lucky enough to serve your third term through your fellow troop hater.

I remember our heroes and war dead on this day, Mr. Bush. I honor them, sincerely, by wanting them home…alive, with their families, getting full benefits and taken care of the rest of their lives in state of the art veterans hospitals....not the rat and roach infested ones you subject them to now!

Of course, you don’t know what it’s like to SERVE, do you, you piece of shit? Your daddy made sure you didn’t have to go to Vietnam, didn’t he? How can you possibly know what these families feel? Even if you could, you wouldn’t care. You have to be human first.

You don’t qualify.

Friday, May 23, 2008

Troop hater John McCain skips the vote for the GI Bill

Neo-con fraud “Songbird” McCain flies the coop on the GI bill vote….continuing his traitorous record with U.S. troops

by Larry Simons
May 22, 2008

The Senate overwhelmingly passed the new GI bill yesterday by a vote of 75-22. The bill includes a 13-week extension of unemployment insurance, home heating assistance and other domestic spending add-ons.

48 of the 75 votes for the GI bill were Senate Democrats. An amazing 25 Republicans voted for the bill as well, with 2 Independents voting ‘Yea’. Of the 25 Republicans who voted to support the troops with more benefits, one name you can’t find on that list is that of Arizona Senator “Songbird”/”Never tortured” John McCain, who skipped the vote yesterday to raise money for himself in California.

The 72-year old fraud McCain, who builds his entire campaign off of “I was tortured” and “I’m a war hero”, couldn’t be there today for our REAL, modern heroes. He was too fucking busy thinking about HIMSELF to be concerned for the well being of our servicemen, who sacrifice everything to fight Bush’s phony terror war, mulled in flawed foreign policy.

ALL 22 ‘Nay’ votes for the bill were REPUBLICANS. Shocker. The ONLY Democrat who did not vote for the bill was Senator Ted Kennedy, who was understandably absent because he is recovering from his hospital stay for a diagnosed brain tumor.

Bush will attempt to veto this bill….naturally, since he hates the troops TOO. The bill now gets sent to the House.

This is now the 2nd bill in a row in which McCain has betrayed America. First, he votes for torture, now it’s not showing up to vote on troops’ benefits


Thursday, May 22, 2008

McCain backer John Hagee: Hitler was fulfilling God’s will for Israel

Sam Stein
Huffington Post
May 21, 2008

John Hagee, the controversial evangelical leader and endorser of Sen. John McCain, argued in a late 1990s sermon that the Nazis had operated on God's behalf to chase the Jews from Europe and shepherd them to Palestine. According to the Reverend, Adolph Hitler was a "hunter," sent by God, who was tasked with expediting God's will of having the Jews re-establish a state of Israel.

Going in and out of biblical verse, Hagee preached: "'And they the hunters should hunt them,' that will be the Jews. 'From every mountain and from every hill and from out of the holes of the rocks.' If that doesn't describe what Hitler did in the holocaust you can't see that."

Watch the video

He goes on: "Theodore Hertzel is the father of Zionism. He was a Jew who at the turn of the 19th century said, this land is our land, God wants us to live there. So he went to the Jews of Europe and said 'I want you to come and join me in the land of Israel.' So few went that Hertzel went into depression. Those who came founded Israel; those who did not went through the hell of the holocaust.

"Then god sent a hunter. A hunter is someone with a gun and he forces you. Hitler was a hunter.

And the Bible says -- Jeremiah writing -- 'They shall hunt them from every mountain and from every hill and from the holes of the rocks,' meaning there's no place to hide. And that might be offensive to some people but don't let your heart be offended. I didn't write it, Jeremiah wrote it.

It was the truth and it is the truth. How did it happen? Because God allowed it to happen. Why did it happen? Because God said my top priority for the Jewish people is to get them to come back to the land of Israel." (Listen to the audio below.)

The sermon, which was first posted by Bruce Wilson on his site, Talk To Action, adds another element to Hagee's controversial stance on the state and history of Israel. It also may provide a new round of political headaches for McCain who has admitted that seeking out Hagee's endorsement was a mistake, but still declared himself "glad to have" it.

A spokesman for Hagee confirmed the authenticity of the remark, which can be found at around the 1:08 mark of his sermon "Battle For Jerusalem."

Since McCain secured the endorsement, both his campaign and Hagee have been pressed to explain a series of derogatory remarks the Reverend made about the Catholic Church, including his reference to the institution as "the Great Whore."

Hagee has since apologized for those remarks. But his interpretation of the role of the Nazis could be harder to dismiss, in part because McCain and Sen. Barack Obama are expected to compete heavily over the Jewish vote come the general election, in part because McCain has said he admires Hagee's commitment to Israel, but mainly because similar theories have found their way into much of the Reverend's writings.

As Wilson notes, in his 2006 book "Jerusalem Countdown", Hagee proposed the theory that "anti-Semitism, and thus the Holocaust, was the fault of Jews themselves -- the result of an age old divine curse incurred by the ancient Hebrews through worshiping idols and passed, down the ages, to all Jews now alive." He also wrote that "Most readers will be shocked by the clear record of history linking Adolf Hitler and the Roman Catholic Church in a conspiracy to exterminate the Jews."

Hagee is considered, in many political circles, to be one of the most passionate and strident supporters of Israel. He has spoken at AIPAC conferences and leads the evangelical group Christians United for Israel. But his views of the country, while possibly shared by others in the evangelical community, can be, at times, startling.

Holding to the belief that Armageddon will come to earth following the
reestablishment of the Kingdom of Israel, Hagee has advocated an aggressive war against Iran and has opposed any Israeli military withdrawal from the West Bank.

McCain, at least in the public record, has sought to thread the needle with the Hagee association: distancing himself from the controversial comment while reaping the political benefits of the Reverend's endorsement. Appearing on ABC's "'This Week" in late April 2008, McCain criticized Hagee's past remarks on the Catholic Church, but said that, "I admire and appreciate his advocacy for the state of Israel, the independence of the state of Israel."

Keith Olbermann covered this story well

Wednesday, May 21, 2008

Ventura Fears 'We Did 9/11 To Ourselves'

Former Governor lectures disbelieving Howard Stern on impossible collapse of buildings

Paul Joseph Watson
Prison Planet
May 21, 2008

Former Governor Jesse Ventura went further in his 9/11 skepticism than ever before today when he told the Howard Stern Show of his fear that elements of the U.S. government carried out the attack, stating, "I hate to fear....that we possibly did it to ourselves."

"There's a lot of very difficult questions that have not been answered and no one seems to want to provide any answers," Ventura told Stern, adding that the most prescient was, "That a third building could fall into its own footprint five hours later having not been struck by much of anything....the 9/11 Commission didn't even address the issue.

Pressed by Stern as to what he thought had happened, Ventura stated, "I hate to fear what could have happened that possibly we did it to ourselves," to which Stern responded "you're kidding me".

Ventura explained that he worked in demolitions when he was in the Navy and questioned how the buildings could fall at the rate of gravity.

The former Governor countered skepticism on behalf of Stern and his co-hosts by pointing out that the WTC towers were built to withstand a jetliner impact.

Stern said it was "unthinkable" that our own government could have perpetrated the attack, to which Ventura reasoned, "Nothing is unthinkable - you're talking about power, you're talking about foreign policy changing over this event, you're talking about getting control over the middle eastern oil."

Stern's co-host then attempted to throw Ventura by asserting that Bush could not be capable of organizing the attack, to which Ventura responded, "I don't know if he is, but I certainly think there are people capable of doing it."

Ventura then pointed out that kerosene does not burn hot enough to melt steel girders and asked why the buildings came down as powder and not in big chunks.

Stern's co-host regurgitated the tired old debunker line of claiming the steel weakened and sagged, causing the building to collapse.

"OK if that's the case, if you use that analogy, then when you go camping and use a propane stove, which propane burns hotter than kerosene does, if you leave it on for two hours and you put a big can of beans on your grill, shouldn't the grill collapse?" asked Ventura.

"This is crazy!" exclaimed Stern, without explaining why Ventura's citation of basic physics had Stern and his team so baffled.

"These two buildings were white elephants, they were losing money, they had asbestos in them, and they were being required by law to do over a billion dollars worth of asbestos removal," said Ventura, pointing out that WTC leaseholder Larry Silverstein made $7 billion dollars from his insurance claim after the attacks.

Ventura first went public with his questions about 9/11 during an on camera interview with Alex Jones in June 2006. He expanded on his thoughts during two subsequent radio interviews in April and May of this year.

CLICK HERE for MP3 of Ventura on Howard Stern.

Joy Behar exposes the Bush/Nazi connection on “The View”

Behar points out Bush’s hypocrisy on appeasement with Nazi’s when his family history is rooted in Nazism (not to mention the source of his family’s first fortune)

by Larry Simons
May 20, 2008

Yesterday, on ABC’s “The View”, a heated debate erupted when co-host Whoopi Goldberg mentioned the fact that, Bush, while speaking before the Israeli Parliament on May 15, was clearly referring to Senator Barack Obama when he said this, “Some seem to believe that we should negotiate with the terrorists and radicals, as if some ingenious argument will persuade them they have been wrong all along.” Bush also added, “We have an obligation to call this what it is -- the false comfort of appeasement, which has been repeatedly discredited by history.”

Watch the clip

Neo-con airhead Elizabeth Hasselbeck wasted no time injecting her right-wing lunatic ramblings into the conversation by saying, “Was he [Bush] eluding to him [Obama], or did Barack Obama assume he was eluding to him…I mean…it’s not always about him, you know, he made a general statement about people who would be appeasing or did it hit a spot in Obama…..[lots of inaudibles]….maybe it struck a spot in Obama because he did say ‘yeah, I would sit down with Ahmadinejacket…as you called him [to Goldberg]..”

Co-host Joy Behar made excellent points about Bush talking to North Korea and Syria, and yet that wasn’t considered appeasement. That was considered diplomacy. Then, Neo-con hack Hasselbeck brings up when Nancy Pelosi talked to other countries, as if there was some point she was trying to convey. Behar responds, “Nancy Pelosi isn’t the President…and she’s not in the Bush administration”. You can hear Hasselbeck saying, “Of course not”. “Of course not?” So, Hasselbeck thinks Pelosi was appointed by George W. Bush, and Behar was just lying about it?

I felt like reaching through my TV set and hugging Behar when she said, “This guy [Bush] doesn’t even know the difference between diplomacy and appeasement”, and then shouted, “he’s so stupid!” Bravo Joy!

That doesn’t even begin to describe the admiration I felt for Behar when she began her next point. She continued, “It’s very interesting and ironic that George Bush, Sr’s…George Bush, this one, his grandfather, this one, the late…I don’t like to speak ill of the dead, but in this case it’s fun. He was the United States Senator, Prescott Bush, OK, he was a director and shareholder of companies that profited from their involvement with the financial backers of Nazi Germany”.

Behar continued, “OK, this is his grandfather. He has no business talking to Jewish people when he’s got this right in his backyard, this guy.”

Does Hasselbeck say, “What? The Bush family made their first fortune from profiting from Nazi’s?” Does she say, “Really? I didn’t know that?” No, of course not. There’s no shock at all from Hasselbeck that the man responsible for two of our Presidents worked for a bank that financed Hitler’s concentration camps. Oh no, what does she do? She DEFENDS Bush!

Hasselbeck says, “You want to talk about backyard, then how come you can bring up this backyard, but that it’s not all right to dig into Obama’s backyard and family history?"..."I mean, come on, let’s play fair.”

Isn’t it amazing that Hasselbeck originally began the discussion, defending Bush, by saying, “Was he [Bush] eluding to him [Obama], or did Barack Obama assume he was eluding to him?..” implying that he wasn't attacking Obama. Then, when Behar brings up some history and mentions that George W. Bush’s grandfather had Nazi ties, Hasselbeck immediately begins to say it’s now OK to attack Obama, in essence ADMITTING that George W. Bush was attacking Obama during his speech before the Israeli Knesset! Amazing!

Personally, I don't give a rats ass if Obama was attacked. I am not a pundit, nor do I ever care to be one. My goal is to bring 'in your face' truth and I really don't care if anyone is offended by the truth. Like my website header says, "The truth is self-sustained". Meaning: if it's the truth, I don't care how anyone feels about it. Democrats and Republicans have been in bed with each other for well over 100 years, maybe longer. My point should be clear. George W. Bush has ties to Nazism----that's fact! If anyone are Nazi appeasers, it's the entire Bush family.

It’s not very often you see the level of truth-telling on national TV that Joy Behar graced us with yesterday. When Real Truth was in its infant stages back in July of 2006 (then a newsletter, not a website), I wrote a story about Prescott Bush’s Nazi connections. Here is that article:

The Bush Family: Evil in America

by Larry Simons
July 22, 2006

How can we live in a country where one family can have so much corruption and hunger for power and yet can be so embraced by its people? More Americans are waking up to the macabre history of the Bush family every day. People, when unable to confront facts, love to label us "far-left" or "extremist" when we compare Bush to Hitler. It just so happens, this is an accurate comparison since the Bush family fortune was launched by the Hitler regime.

George W. Bush is a member of the satanic secret society Skull & Bones, like his father before him, George H.W. and his grandfather, Prescott. George W. and George Sr. are also members of the Bohemian Grove, a secret society where satanic mock sacrifices are included in their rituals. Prescott Bush funded Hitler when he worked for his friend Averell Harriman, a fellow "bonesmen" and member of the Council of Foreign Relations, a globalist organization, which includes, among its members, the head of FOX news, Rupert Murdoch.

Prescott Bush and other elitists tried bringing Hitler-style fascism to America in the 30’s, and was even plotting to assassinate FDR, until the man they hired to spearhead it, war hero General Smedley Butler, whistleblew it to Congress. It seems now that George W. is attempting to complete the mission daddy and grandpa set out to establish….the New World Order. Things may not have been much different if George’s cousin and fellow "bonesman", John Kerry would have been elected.

Smedley Butler

How ironic that most Christians embrace Bush, since he seems to have the characteristics and actions of the anti-Christ: convincing many that he is good, establishing totalitarianism and being popular and worshipped by those who end up deceived by him.

With this administration torching the Constitution, wiretapping our phones, deeming us terrorists already (Patriot Act), and the new national ID cards soon to come with RFID chips, total martial law and complete tyranny will be just another government-orchestrated terrorist attack away. Why don’t we hear about this in the papers or TV? Because the top newspapers and news agencies are owned by the world’s elite. Between the Government, the Council of Foreign Relations, the Bilderberg Group and the Trilateral Commission, it’s a miracle we know anything.

Research it for yourself. This is all public. It’s not science fiction. It’s real. We are continually being lied to by our government under the guise of "security" and we are deemed un-American if we dare dissent or ask questions. We need to take our country back from these fascist, power-hungry evildoers whose purpose is only to gain more power. Only informed and truly patriotic Americans can save this country from tyranny. Hitler once said, "How fortunate for governments that the people they administer to don’t think".

Unfortunately, how true that is.

Here is a segment of the Alex Jones film, “Martial Law: 9-11 Rise of the Police State”. It shows Investigative Journalist John Buchanon tell, in detail, his findings from the National Archives and the Library of Congress when he researched the history of the Bush family.

Monday, May 19, 2008

Iran Busts CIA-Backed Terror Group

Announcement follows Neo-Con General's urge for Bush administration to support terrorist bombings in Iran

Paul Joseph Watson
Prison Planet
May 19, 2008

The Iranian Intelligence Ministry busted a CIA-backed terror group that was planning to bomb scientific, educational, and religious centers, and carry out assassinations, according to a report in the Tehran Times. The arrests come weeks after Ret. Gen. Thomas McInerney urged the U.S. to carry out terror bombings in Iran.

"The Intelligence Ministry on Saturday released details of the detection and dismantling of a terrorist network affiliated to the United States," reports the newspaper.

"The United States Central Intelligence Agency comprehensively supported the terrorist group by arming it, training its members, and sponsoring its inhumane activities in Iran, the Intelligence Ministry stated."

The attack on a religious center in Shiraz last month which killed thirteen people and wounded 190 was blamed on the same group and according to the report, "it also had plans to carry out similar attacks on the Tehran International Book Fair, the Russian Consulate in Gilan Province, oil pipelines in southern Iran, and other targets."

While it's obviously naive to take a report out of Iranian state-controlled media at face value, top Neo-Cons have been calling for the US to back terror groups in Iran and other reports clearly indicate that this program has already been in place for years.

On Friday we reported on the comments of Ret. Gen. Thomas McInerney, who in a Fox News appearance publicly called for the U.S. government to support groups like MEK (Mujahedin-e Khalq Organization), which is listed by the State Department as a terrorist organization, and carry out deadly bombings in Iran.

"Here’s what I would suggest to you. Number one, we take the National Council for Resistance to Iran off the terrorist list that the Clinton Administration put them on as well as the Mujahedin-e Khalq at the Camp Ashraf in Iraq," said McInerney.

"Then I would start a tit-for-tat strategy which I wrote up in the Wall Street Journal a year ago: For every EFP that goes off and kills Americans, two go off in Iran. No questions asked. People don’t have to know how it was done. It’s a covert action. They become the most unlucky country in the world," he added.

Last November, Fox and Friends host Brian Kilmeade openly called for US support for acts of terrorism, such as car bombings, in Tehran. Colonel David Hunt, who has over 29 years of military experience including extensive operational experience in Special Operations, Counter Terrorism and Intelligence Operations, agreed with Kilmeade, stating "absolutely" in response to Kilmead's question about whether cars should start blowing up in Tehran.

The U.S. government is already funding MEK and the group has been linked with numerous bombings inside Iran over the course of the last few years. The organization has also killed U.S. troops and civilians since the 70's.

According to Global, "In the early 1970s, angered by U.S. support for the pro-Western shah, MEK members killed several U.S. soldiers and civilians working on defense projects in Iran. MEK members also supported the 1979 takeover of the U.S. Embassy in Tehran, in which 52 Americans were held hostage for 444 days."

In addition - British SAS have been caught training insurgents in Iraq to carry out hi-tech bombings that are later blamed on Iran.

Another Iranian-based terror group that the Bush administration is already funding as a means of regime change in Iran is Jundullah - a Sunni Al-Qaeda terrorist group formerly headed by the alleged mastermind of 9/11, Khalid Sheikh Mohammed.

"The CIA is giving arms-length support, supplying money and weapons, to an Iranian militant group, Jundullah, which has conducted raids into Iran from bases in Pakistan," the London Telegraph reported last year.

The group has been blamed for a number of bombings inside Iran aimed at destabilizing Ahmadinejad's government and is also active in Pakistan, having been fingered for its involvement in attacks on police stations and car bombings at the Pakistan-US Cultural Center in 2004.

As award-winning journalist Seymour Hersh reported back in 2004, U.S. intelligence and Israel’s Mossad are busy at work stirring up trouble in Iran in preparation for an attack on that country. In early 2005, the Guardian reported that "American special forces have been on the ground inside Iran scouting for US air strike targets for suspected nuclear weapons sites."

Saturday, May 17, 2008

IVAW member Matthis Chiroux announces his refusal to deploy to Iraq (and my personal letter to him)

Iraq Veterans Against the War
May 16, 2008

Sgt. Matthis Chiroux, who served in the Army until being honorably discharged last summer after over four years of service in Afghanistan, Japan, Europe and the Phillipines, today publicly announced his intention to refuse orders to deploy to Iraq.

Sgt. Chiroux made made his announcement in the Cannon House Office Building Rotunda after members of Iraq Veterans Against the War testified before the Congressional Progressive Caucus during Winter Soldier on the Hill.

Sgt. Chiroux made the following statement to the press. (Video of his announcement is also available.)

Good afternoon. My name is Sgt. Matthis Chiroux, and I served in the Army as a Photojournalist until being honorably discharged last summer after over four years of service in Afghanistan, Japan, Europe and the Phillipines. As an Army journalist whose job it was to collect and filter servicemember's stories, I heard many stomach-churning testimonies of the horrors and crimes taking place in Iraq. For fear of retaliation from the military, I failed to report these crimes, but never again will I allow fear to silence me. Never again will I fail to stand.

In February, I received a letter from the Army ordering my return to active duty, for the purpose of mobilization for Operation Iraqi Freedom.Thanks in great part to the truths of war being fearlessly spoken by my fellow IVAW members, I stand before you today with the strength, clarity and resolve to declare to the military and the world that this Soldier will not be deploying to Iraq.

This occupation is unconstitutional and illegal and I hereby lawfully refuse to participate as I will surely be a party to war crimes. Furthermore, deployment in support of illegal war violates all of my core values as a human being, but in keeping with those values, I choose to remain in the United States to defend myself from charges brought by the Army if they so wish to pursue them. I refuse to participate in the occupation of Iraq.

To donate to IVAW’s Legal Fund to support Matthis and other servicemembers who are refusing to support the occupation of Iraq, use our online donation form and select "Legal Fund" under special projects.

If you would like to send a message of support to Sgt Matthis Chiroux, email

Here is the video incase you can’t access it

After reading this story, I emailed him to thank him. Here’s my letter to him:

Sgt. Chiroux,

Thank you for your service to this country. Youre doing the right thing by not wanting to return to a country we never should have been in. I have always supported the troops but have never supported Bush's illegal, unconstitutional and undeclared occupation of Iraq. Thank you for taking a stand. If only ALL the troops would do this, there would be no more war. We cant depend on this treasonous administration who sent you there to die for nothing. Luckily, you survived, but over 4,000 of us didnt.

We cant depend on our lazy, lying Democratic Congress who were voted in in 2006 to stop this war, only to end up as traitors who continue to give Bush and his minions more blank checks to continue this quagmire that is the Iraq war. It is not surprising that Congressman Ron Paul has received the highest amount of support and campaign dollars from active military personnel because his stance is the Constitutional one, that we are not to nation-build or police the world.

You're a hero and you are more supported by your actions than you might realize. I have lots of true patriotic friends who I haven't even talked to about you yet (because I just learned of you), but I can tell you with 100% certainty that they support you too. The Bush administration should all be tried and executed for war crimes and treason. People like YOU are the TRUE patriots that all of us in this country should emulate. Thank you for your service and thank you for refusing to be a part of Bush's crimes.

You stand tall and keep fighting for the truth and for the principles this country was founded on. Many uninformed and just plain ignorant people will call you a traitor. Don't let it bother you one bit. The people that will demonize you for this are the very same ones who gladly sound the trumpets for war, but were too chickenshit to enlist themselves. Those people are haters of America and most likely have no idea what the Constitution says, and if they did, wouldn't care.

From a true patriot to another,

Larry Simons
Hagerstown, MD

Friday, May 16, 2008

Rumsfeld On Tape: Terror Attack Could Restore Neo-Con Agenda

Former Defense Secretary's conversation with military analysts on political problems - "The Correction For That...Is An Attack"

Paul Joseph Watson
Prison Planet
May 16, 2008

Shocking excerpts of confidential recordings recently released under the Freedom of Information Act feature former Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld talking with top military analysts about how a flagging Neo-Con political agenda could be successfully restored with the aid of another terrorist attack on America.

The tape also includes a conversation where Rumsfeld and the military analysts agree on the possible necessity of installing a brutal dictator in Iraq to oversee U.S. interests.

The tapes were released as part of the investigation into the Pentagon's "message force multipliers" program in which top military analysts were hired to propagandize for the Iraq war in the corporate media.

In attendance at the valedictory luncheon Rumsfeld hosted on December 12, 2006 were David L. Grange, Donald W. Sheppard, James Marks, Rick Francona, Wayne Downing, and Robert H. Scales, Jr. among others.

The most extraordinary exchange takes place when Lt. Gen. Michael DeLong bemoans shrinking political support for Neo-Con war plans on Capitol Hill and suggests that sympathy for the Bush administration's agenda will only be achieved after a new terror attack.

Rumsfeld agrees that the psychological impact of 9/11 is wearing off and the "behavior pattern" of citizens in both the U.S. and Europe suggests that they are unconcerned about the threat of terror.

DELONG: Politically, what are the challenges because you're not going to have a lot of sympathetic ears up there until it [a terror attack] happens.

RUMSFELD: That's what I was just going to say. This President's pretty much a victim of success. We haven't had an attack in five years. The perception of the threat is so low in this society that it's not surprising that the behavior pattern reflects a low threat assessment. The same thing's in Europe, there's a low threat perception. The correction for that, I suppose, is an attack. And when that happens, then everyone gets energized for another [inaudible] and it's a shame we don't have the maturity to recognize the seriousness of the threats...the lethality, the carnage, that can be imposed on our society is so real and so present and so serious that you'd think we'd be able to understand it, but as a society, the longer you get away from 9/11, the less...the less...

Click here for the audio clip.

In another exchange, after assuring that comments are "off the record," Rumsfeld and one of the military analysts agree that Iraq could use a "Syngman Rhee" to take control of Iraq. Syngman Rhee was the ruthless authoritarian dictator of South Korea from after World War II through the Korean War to 1960. If the invasion of Iraq was about liberating the Iraqis from a tyrant in the form of Saddam Hussein why is Rumsfeld talking about installing an even more brutal dictator?

Click here for the audio clip. Newsvine has the recording in full.

Rumsfeld's admission that the correction for dwindling support of the Neo-Con imperial crusade is another terror attack is perhaps the most startling and blatant indication that 9/11 was an inside job.

How much more evidence do we need to confirm that the Neo-Con hierarchy in control of the U.S. government are instigating and exploiting terror in the pursuit of their own domestic and geopolitical agenda?

As Jerry Mazza writes today, "In the seven years since the day, exhaustive and still growing evidence proves beyond any reasonable doubt that the US government, spearheaded by the Bush administration, planned, orchestrated and executed the 9/11 false flag operation. As openly advocated by wide swaths of elites, from the Project for the New American Century (PNAC), of which Rumsfeld has been a member, to the likes of Zbigniew Brzezinski (in his The Grand Chessboard), only an attack "on the order of Pearl Harbor" would, in Brzezinski’s words, cause the American people to support an "imperial mobilization," and a world war."

Placing the new evidence against previously revealed 9/11-related acts on the part of Rumsfeld, his guilt is overt and obvious. Recall that it was Rumsfeld who enthusiastically penned the "Go Massive" memo, gleefully declaring the Bush administration finally had the green light to kill: "Not only UBL (Usama bin Laden). Go massive. Sweep it all up. Things related and not."

The longing for a new terror attack to corral the masses back behind the Neo-Con agenda is a shared fetish amongst Neo-Cons, policy wonks and academics alike.

In August last year Philadelphia Daily News columnist Stu Bykofsky openly called for "another 9/11" that "would help America" restore a "community of outrage and national resolve".

Lt.-Col. Doug Delaney, chair of the war studies program at the Royal Military College in Kingston, Ontario, told the Toronto Star last July that "The key to bolstering Western resolve is another terrorist attack like 9/11 or the London transit bombings of two years ago."

The same sentiment was also explicitly expressed in a 2005 GOP memo, which yearned for new attacks that would "validate" the President's war on terror and "restore his image as a leader of the American people."

Also in July 2007, former Republican Senator Rick Santorum suggested that a series of "unfortunate events," namely terrorist attacks, will occur within the next year and change American citizen's perception of the war.

And the month before that, the new chairman of the Arkansas Republican Party Dennis Milligan said that there needed to be more attacks on American soil for President Bush to regain popular approval.

Comments posted on the left-wing Huffington Post website in response to the Rumsfeld tape indicate that even some of the most hardcore conspiracy debunkers have had their beliefs shaken to the core by the former Defense Secretary's admission.

"I have been a very staunch opponent of conspiracy theories," writes one, "but to hear the man most responsible for stopping foreign threats to American lives musing that a successful attack on the USA is somehow a "cure" for us... it almost makes me want to make a tinfoil hat with the nuts I made fun of."

Neo-Con General Calls For Terror Attacks In Iran
McInerney urges U.S. government to support terrorist organization MEK, Bush administration already bankrolling Al-Qaeda-linked Jundullah group

Paul Joseph Watson
Prison Planet
May 16, 2008

Fresh off the revelation of Donald Rumsfeld's 2006 audio tape admission that a method to reinvigorate the Neo-Con agenda would be another terror attack, Neo-Cons like Ret. Gen. Thomas McInerney, who was part of the Pentagon's "message force multipliers" propaganda program, have been calling for the Bush administration to commit acts of terror in Iran.

According to the Crooks and Liars blog, McInerney has appeared on Fox News 144 times since Jan 2002. In one of his recent appearances he publicly called for the U.S. government to support groups like MEK, which is listed by the State Department as a terrorist organization, and carry out deadly bombings in Iran.

McInerney: Here’s what I would suggest to you. Number one, we take the National Council for Resistance to Iran off the terrorist list that the Clinton Administration put them on as well as the Mujahedin-e Khalq at the Camp Ashraf in Iraq. Then I would start a tit-for-tat strategy which I wrote up in the Wall Street Journal a year ago: For every EFP that goes off and kills Americans, two go off in Iran. No questions asked. People don’t have to know how it was done. It’s a covert action. They become the most unlucky country in the world. …

McInerney's frothing desire to see women and children blown to bits in the streets of Tehran may have something to do with the fact that "McInerney is on the Board of Directors for several companies with defense-related contracts that would seem to benefit from his pro-war propaganda. For example, Alloy Surfaces Company (ASC), whose contracts for "ammunition and explosives" with the Department of Defense appear to have grown from $15 million in 2002 to more than $169 million in 2006. A conflict of interest, perhaps?"

McInerney "tit-for-tat" strategy, to support MEK-run terror bombings in Iran in retaliation for Iran supposedly killing U.S. troops in Iraq, a baseless claim in itself, is all the more horribly ironic when one considers the fact that MEK "has killed US troops and civilians before back in the 1970s".

As Crooks and Liars points out, the U.S. government is already funding MEK and the group has been linked with numerous bombings inside Iran over the course of the last few years.

In addition - British SAS have been caught training insurgents in Iraq to carry out hi-tech bombings that are later blamed on Iran.

Another Iranian-based terror group that the Bush administration is already funding as a means of regime change in Iran is Jundullah - a Sunni Al-Qaeda terrorist group formerly headed by the alleged mastermind of 9/11, Khalid Sheikh Mohammed.

"The CIA is giving arms-length support, supplying money and weapons, to an Iranian militant group, Jundullah, which has conducted raids into Iran from bases in Pakistan," the London Telegraph reported last year.

The group has been blamed for a number of bombings inside Iran aimed at destabilizing Ahmadinejad's government and is also active in Pakistan, having been fingered for its involvement in attacks on police stations and car bombings at the Pakistan-US Cultural Center in 2004.

Crooks and Liars documents White House efforts to censor reports about MEK and other Iranian terror groups in the U.S. corporate media.

In Dec 2006, just days after Rumsfeld was forced to step down, the NYT published a heavily redacted op-ed by Flynt Leverett and Hillary Mann. Though none of the info was classified, all of which had previously "been extensively reported in the news media," much of their article was blacked out because the "White House intervened" before it went to print. In response, Leverett and Mann followed up with an accompanying piece "What We Wanted to Tell You About Iran" where they provided citations to previously reported sources for all of the redacted info. Raw Story compiled those sources in their "The redacted Iran op-ed revealed" and, surprise, many of the articles refer directly to the MEK terrorist group, but there had been nary a mention in the portions the White House allowed.

So, to recap: One of the Pentagon’s propaganda TV analysts who has clear ties to defense industries that would likely stand to benefit from any increased hostilities is advocating that the US ought to use a terrorist organization to commit acts of terrorism against Iran in response to alleged Iranian involvement in attacks against US forces in Iraq, which
might be true, or maybe not. And if that wasn’t outrageous enough, it seems that Bush may have been authorizing such tactics already.

Thursday, May 15, 2008

Olbermann to Bush: “Shut the Hell Up!”

Olbermann blasts President Bush for suggesting that electing a Democrat as president means “another attack on the United States.” Olbermann also questions Bush's claim that he gave up golf out of empathy for fallen U.S. soldiers.

Countdown with Keith Olbermann
May 14, 2008

OLBERMANN: Finally tonight, as promised, a Special Comment on two topics a lot of us had foolishly thought, and had naively hoped, we would not again have to address, and a third topic nobody thought a President would ever seriously mention in public, unless perhaps he‘d just been hit in the head with something and was not in full possession of his faculties, how he expressed his empathy to the families of the dead in Iraq by giving up golf.

The President has resorted anew to the sleaziest fear-mongering and mass manipulation of an administration of a public life dedicated to realizing the lowest of our expectations. And he has now applied these poisons to the 2008 presidential election, on behalf of the party at whose center he and Mr. McCain lurk.

Mr. Bush has predicted that the election of a Democratic president could, quote, “eventually lead to another attack on the United States.”

This ludicrous, infuriating, holier-than-thou and most importantly bone-headedly wrong statement came yesterday during an interview with and online users of Yahoo. The question was phrased as follows: “If we were to pull out of Iraq next year, what‘s the worst that could happen, what‘s the doomsday scenario?”

The President replied: “Doomsday scenario of course is that extremists throughout the Middle East would be emboldened, which would eventually lead to another attack on the United States.

“The biggest issue we face is, it‘s bigger than Iraq, it‘s this ideological struggle against cold-blooded killers who will kill people to achieve their political objectives.”

Mr. Bush, at long last, has it not dawned on you that the America you have now created, includes ‘cold-blooded killers who will kill people to achieve their political objectives‘? They are those in, or formerly in, your employ, who may yet be charged some day with war crimes. Through your haze of self-congratulation and self-pity, do you still have no earthly clue that this nation has laid waste to Iraq to achieve your political objectives?

‘This ideological struggle‘ you speak of, Mr. Bush, is taking place within this country. It is a struggle between Americans who cherish freedom, ours and everybody else‘s, and Americans like you, sir, to whom freedom is just a brand name, just like “Patriot Act” is a brand name or “Protect America” is a brand name.

But wait, there‘s more.

You also said “Iraq is the place where al Qaeda and other extremists have made their stand and they will be defeated.”

They made no “stand” in Iraq, sir. You allowed them to assemble there! As certainly as if that were the plan, the borders were left wide open by your government‘s farcical post-invasion strategy of ‘they‘ll greet us as liberators'.

And as certainly as if that were the plan, the inspiration for another generation of terrorists in another country was provided by your government‘s farcical post-invasion strategy of letting the societal infrastructure of Iraq dissolve, to be replaced by an American Vice-Royalty enforced by merciless mercenaries who shoot unarmed Iraqis and then evade prosecution in any country by hiding behind your skirts, sir.

Terrorism inside Iraq is your creation, Mr. Bush!

It was a Yahoo user who brought up the second topic, upon whose introduction Mr. Bush should have passed, or punted, or gotten up and left the room, claiming he heard Dick Cheney calling him.

“Do you feel,” asked an ordinary American, “that you were misled on Iraq?”

“I feel like—I felt like there were weapons of mass destruction. You know, “mislead” is a strong word, it almost connotes some kind of intentional—I don‘t think so, I think there was a—not only our intelligence community, but intelligence communities all across the world shared the same assessment. And so I was disappointed to see how flawed our intelligence was.”

Flawed? You, Mr. Bush, and your tragically know-it-all minions, threw out every piece of intelligence that suggested there were no such weapons. You, Mr. Bush, threw out every person who suggested that the sober, contradictory, reality-based intelligence needed to be listened to, and damn fast. You, Mr. Bush, are responsible for how “intelligence communities all across the world shared the same assessment.”

You and the sycophants you dredged up and put behind the most important steering wheel in the world propagated palpable nonsense and shoved it down the throat of every intelligence community across the world, and punished everybody who didn‘t agree it was really chicken salad.

And you, Mr. Bush, threw under the bus all of the subsequent critics who bravely stepped forward later to point out just how much of a self-fulfilling prophecy you had embraced, and adopted as this country‘s policy, in lieu of, say, common sense.

The fiasco of pre-war intelligence, sir, is your fiasco.

You should build a great statue of yourself turning a deaf ear to the warnings of the realists, while you are shown embracing the three-card monte dealers, like Richard Perle and Donald Rumsfeld and Dick Cheney. That would be a far more fitting tribute to your legacy, Mr. Bush, than this Presidential library you are constructing as a giant fable about your presidency, an edifice you might as claim was built from Iraqi Weapons of Mass Destruction, because there will be just as many of those inside your Presidential library as there were inside Saddam Hussein‘s Iraq.

Of course, if there is one over-riding theme to this president‘s administration it is the utter, always-failing, inability to know when to quit when it is behind. And so Mr. Bush answered yet another question about this layered, nuanced, wheels-within-wheels garbage heap that constituted his excuse for war.

“And so you feel that you didn‘t have all the information you should have or the right spin on that information?”

“No, no,” replied the President. “I was told by people that they had weapons of mass destruction.”


What people?

The insane informant “Curveball?”

The Iraqi snake-oil salesman Ahmed Chalabi?

The American snake-oil salesman Dick Cheney?

“I was told by people that they had weapons of mass destruction, as were members of Congress, who voted for the resolution to get rid of Saddam Hussein.

“And of course, the political heat gets on and they start to run and try to hide from their votes.”

Mr. Bush, you destroyed the evidence that contradicted the resolution you jammed down the Congress‘s throat, the way you jammed it down the nation‘s throat. When required by law to verify that your evidence was accurate, you simply re-submitted it, with phrases amounting to “See, I done proved it,” virtually written in the margins in crayon. You defied patriotic Americans to say “The Emperor Has No Clothes” only this time with the stakes—as you and the mental dwarves in your employ put it—being a “mushroom cloud over an American city.”

And as a final crash of self-indulgent nonsense, when the incontrovertible truth of your panoramic and murderous deceit has even begun to cost your political party seemingly perpetual Congressional seats in places like North Carolina and, last night, Mississippi, you can actually say with a straight face, sir, that the members of Congress, “the political heat gets on and they start to run and try to hide from their votes,” while you greet the political heat and try to run and hide from your presidency, and your legacy.

Four thousand of the Americans you were supposed to protect are dead in Iraq, with your only feeble, pathetic answer being, “I was told by people that they had weapons of mass destruction.”

Then came Mr. Bush‘s final blow to our nation‘s solar plexus, his last re-opening of our common wounds, his last remark that makes the rest of us question not merely his leadership or his judgment but his very suitably to remain in office.

“Mr. President,” he was asked, “you haven‘t been golfing in recent years. Is that related to Iraq?

“Yes,” began perhaps the most startling reply of this nightmarish blight on our lives as Americans, on our history.

“It really is. I don‘t want some mom whose son may have recently died to see the Commander-in-Chief playing golf. I feel I owe it to the families to be as—to be in solidarity as best as I can with them. And I think playing golf during a war just sends the wrong signal.”

Golf, sir?

Golf sends the wrong signal to the grieving families of our men and women butchered in Iraq?

Do you think these families, Mr. Bush, their lives blighted forever, care about you playing golf?

Do you think, sir, they care about you?

You, Mr. Bush, you who let their sons and daughters be killed. Sir, to show your solidarity with them you gave up golf? Sir, to show your solidarity with them you didn‘t give up your pursuit of this insurance-scam, profiteering, morally and financially bankrupting war. Sir, to show your solidarity with them you didn‘t even give up talking about Iraq, a subject about which you have incessantly proved without pause or backwards glance, that you may literally be the least informed person in the world?

Sir, to show your solidarity with them, you didn‘t give up your presidency? In your own words “solidarity as best as I can” is to stop a game? That is the “best” you can?

Four thousands Americans give up their lives and your sacrifice was to give up golf!

Not “gulf”—golf.

And still it gets worse.

Because it proves that the President‘s unendurable sacrifice, his unbearable pain, the suspension of getting to hit a stick with a ball, was not even his own damned idea.

“Mr. President, was there a particular moment or incident that brought you to that decision, or how did you come to that?”

“I remember when de Mello was killed, who was at the U.N., got killed in Baghdad as a result of these murderers taking this good man‘s life. And I was playing golf—I think I was in central Texas—and they pulled me off the golf course and I said, it‘s just not worth it any more to do.”

Your one, tone-deaf, arrogant, pathetic, embarrassing gesture, and you didn‘t even think of it yourself? The great Bushian sacrifice, an Army private loses a leg, a Marine loses half his skull, four thousand of their brothers and sisters lose their lives, you lose golf and they have to pull you off the golf course to get you to just do that?

If it‘s even true.

Apart from your medical files, which dutifully record your torn calf muscle and the knee pain which forced you to give up running at the same time, coincidence no doubt, the bombing in Baghdad which killed Sergio Vieira de Mello of the UN and interrupted your round of golf, was on August 19th, 2003.

Yet there‘s an Associate Press account of you and photographs playing golf as late as Columbus Day of that year, October 13th, nearly two months later. Mr. Bush, I hate to break it to you six-and-a-half years after you yoked this nation and your place in history to the wrong war, in the wrong place, against the wrong people, but the war in Iraq is not about you!

It is not, Mr. Bush, about your grief when American after American comes home in a box. It is not, Mr. Bush, about what your addled brain has produced in the way of paranoid delusions of risks that do not exist, ready to be activated if some Democrat, and not your twin, Mr. McCain, succeeds you.

The war in Iraq, your war, Mr. Bush, is about how you accomplished the derangement of two nations, and how you helped funnel billions of taxpayer dollars to lascivious and perennially thirsty corporations like Halliburton and Blackwater, and how you sent 4,000 Americans to their deaths for nothing.

It is not, Mr. Bush, about your golf game!

And, sir, if you have any hopes that next January 20th will not be celebrated as a day of soul-wrenching, heart-felt Thanksgiving, because your faithless stewardship of this presidency will have finally come to a merciful end, this last piece of advice: when somebody asks you, sir, about Democrats who must now pull this country back from the abyss you have placed us at—when somebody asks you, sir, about the cooked books and faked threats you foisted on a sincere and frightened nation—when somebody asks you, sir, about your gallant, noble, self-abnegating sacrifice of your golf game so as to soothe the families of the war dead; this advice, Mr. Bush: shut the hell up!

Good night, and good luck.

Wednesday, May 14, 2008

Chicago Citizens Reject Terror Drill Fearmongering

Just 350 out of expected 4,000 participate in bio-attack "processing" exercise at Sears Centre Arena

Paul Joseph Watson
Prison Planet
May 14, 2008

The latest opportunity for authorities to grandstand, fearmonger and practice processing citizens through a de facto internment camp fell flat on its face yesterday after just 350 out of an expected 4,000 turned up to participate in a mock terror drill at Chicago's Sears Centre Arena.

"An elaborate public-health drill Tuesday that organizers had hoped would use thousands of volunteers to help test the Chicago area's response to a possible bioterrorism attack instead drew fewer than 350 people—and one beleaguered Cook County Board president," reports the Chicago Tribune.

"The exercise, estimated to cost $80,000, was mandated and funded by the U.S. Department of Homeland Security, which has called for health departments nationwide to coordinate drills since the terrorist attacks on Sept. 11, 2001."

Authorities practiced processing citizens through the de facto internment camp and giving them mandatory pharmaceutical products.

Perhaps the people of Chicago's lack of enthusiasm for the drill can be explained by them waking up to the fact that these exercises are nothing more than an excuse for fat enforcers to practice shoving people around in internment camps while the local TV news shows images of people being rounded up and processed by men with big guns - all part of the conditioning for an attack we are constantly assured is "inevitable".

Or maybe it was because the only "terrorists" found in Chicago were a group out of Miami that supposedly planned to "wage a full ground war against the United States" and bomb the Sears Tower, but who actually turned out to be "a bunch of dipshits living in a warehouse," as The Daily Show's Jon Stewart described them.

As in every other case we have studied, the men turned out to be a semi-retarded street gang that were provocateured by FBI agents into spewing violent rhetoric yet barely had the capability to make a cheese sandwich, never mind bring down the tallest building in America.

What they were interested in was a promise of $50,000 in cash from the government informants who were sent in to radicalize them and create a phony victory for Bush's war on terror.

As the Miami New Times newspaper described it, the "ragtag group couldn't wage a ground war on a jar of peppercorns." The whole case descended into a farce as judges repeatedly declared a mistrial while the government tried to save face.

The fact that there are no real terrorists that are not government-run is a moot point for government minions that get off on pathetic power trips and bossing people around under the pretext that they are saving America from the deadly terrorists.

As is the fact that the only bio-terror attacks against U.S. citizens in America - the infamous biological tests in U.S. cities from San Francisco to New York which killed Americans from the 40's to the 60's, Project SHAD, which exposed uninformed and unwilling US military personnel and others to deadly bio-weapons during the Cold War, and the 2001 anthrax attacks which led back to Fort Detrick Maryland, were run by the U.S. military-industrial complex itself.

In addition, according to the Miami Herald, "The United States held open-air biological and chemical weapons tests in at least four states - Alaska, Hawaii, Maryland and Florida - during the 1960s," during which they "used artillery shells and bombs filled with the nerve agents sarin and VX," according to Pentagon documents.

Given that history, preparing for a bio-attack on behalf of "terrorists," like our warehouse dipshit friends, seems like a waste of time when the real threat has always been from the inside.

Monday, May 12, 2008

Billo goes nuts! And this was BEFORE Franken, Olbermann, Mackris and loofahs! (Oh my!)

An unearthed clip of Inside Edition shows Billo the way he REALLY is… out of control NUTBALL who is a ticking time bomb (chock full of F-bombs!)

by Larry Simons
May 12, 2008

In this old clip from Inside Edition (date unknown, between the O’ Reilly years 1989-1995) Billo is seen ending the taping of a program. He seems to have trouble saying the words, “To play us out” as he ferociously shouts at the stagehand, “I can’t do it!! I don’t know what that means….'to play us out'”!!! The stagehand calmly tells psychopath O’ Reilly the phrase “To play us out” is to be used to ‘play the rest of the show out’ with a song by Sting.

Watch Crazy Bill turn into Satan right before your eyes
(YouTube will not let this clip be uploaded)

If Billo can get THIS angry THIS fast over something so trivial, imagine how he must react 4 nights a week when Keith Olbermann awards him “Worst Person in the World” on Keith’s show “Countdown”!!

This is the same guy who writes these stupid books for kids?

This is the same guy who wrote a book in 1998 called, “Those Who Trespass: A Novel of Television and Murder”, about a television journalists’ revenge on network staff after disputes that were eerily similar to O’ Reilly’s real life conflicts with CBS? The revenge results in a series of murders. In the book, the murders are as follows:

Throwing the woman who had the antagonist (Shannon Michaels) fired from the TV station, off a balcony.

Burying a research consultant, who had advised the station to fire Michaels, in beach sand up to his neck and letting him slowly drown

Slitting the throat of the station manager

I guess the stagehand was lucky that all he got was a good ear full from the future Sultan of Spin and not thrown off a balcony!

Why wasn’t psycho Bill fired immediately after this? Why was he allowed to walk the streets freely after this?

Keep in mind, this was all because Billo couldn’t read a few simple words from a teleprompter. Imagine what he must do during commercial breaks after he’s been completely shellacked by Phil Donahue or Chris Dodd!

Never to fail us, Olbermann talks about psycho Billo on Countdown


Sunday, May 11, 2008

Jenna Bush gets married.......who really cares????

With gas near $4 a gallon nationwide and Americans selling possessions to buy food and gas, why would anyone on planet Earth give a 2-cent rats shithole that the daughter of the country's (maybe even the world's) most hated man got married?

by Larry Simons
May 11, 2008

The above picture sums it up pretty good. This is how stupid Americans are. Americans are struggling now more than ever with gas and food at record prices and there are people in this country that actually give a shit that Jenna Bush got married? Can anyone tell me WHY????

I thought it would be fun to list 5 stories that would be more important than this story if they were a headline in your local paper tomorrow.

5. Dog pisses on grass

4. Old man crosses street

3. I take a shit, wipe my ass, then flush

2. Ann B. Davis, still alive

1. Richard Simmons, still world's #1 fag

Troops are dying! The middle-class is being wiped out! People are selling the homes they can't afford to live in and selling possessions to buy gas and food!


Thursday, May 8, 2008

Bill O’ Liar condemns blogger who says John McCain was never tortured, yet the only evidence he can supply is McCain’s broken arm

Blogger tells the truth about "songbird" McCain. O’ Liar attacks blogger and tells his sheep that McCain doesn’t have to prove his "torture" because his broken arm is all the proof he needs

by Larry Simons
May 8, 2008

The White House channel’s Sultan of Spin, Bill O’ Reilly, was caught last night in, yet again, another of his "It’s a lie simply because I say it’s a lie" moments.

These incidents are usually accompanied by a guest parroting his views, agreeing with him and [when he claims someone is lying] offering absolutely no evidence whatsoever that he is right and has no other guests on his show (despite FOX News' claims of being "fair and balanced") to counter his claims.

During O’ Reilly’s 2nd stupidest segment on his show, "Policing the Net" (#1 being the "Body Language" segment), his morbid obsession with the Huffington Post and how "evil" Arianna Huffington is once again the central topic. Loofah boy mentions to his Internet police woman guest Mary Katherine Ham that there was a blogger on the Huffington Post who said that John McCain was never tortured.

Here is the dialogue between O’ Liar and Ham:

O’ Reilly: "Now I picked out the Huffington Post because it’s just so despicable, and ..and all I had to do, this took me about 2 seconds, listen to this…I want your reaction. This is a guy blogging about John McCain, quote: ‘When people learn about the real John McCain who was never tortured by the North Vietnamese, who in fact, collaborated with them’."

"You know, this is why Arianna Huffington has a huge karma debt. She is a woman in disgrace, because, you know, this is what you’re gonna see on the Huffington Post and other far-left blogs, you know?"

Ham: "Right, this is, had some currency both on the sort of wacko right and the wacko left, this theory that John McCain somehow was not, didn’t really refuse to be let go by the Vietnamese, and that he somehow colluded with them. And that’s something that, obviously, the responsible bloggers are going to have to fight back against, and people like Arianna Huffington would help out by saying, ‘hey, this is not allowed on my blog’".

O’ Reilly: "Well, she’d never do that because the woman is, has no standards of behavior at all."

Ham: "But, John McCain is fairly prepared to make the argument against that I would imagine".

O’ Reilly: "You know, I don’t know if he will or not. I think, you know, a guy who can’t left his arm over his shoulder because they broke it---I don’t think he has to say anything…I wouldn’t if I were him on this. I’d just let it go."

It just so happens that the blogger is correct, according to Vietnam vet Jack McLamb, who served in secret operations in Cambodia, was a highly decorated police officer in Phoenix and hostage negotiator for the FBI.

McLamb told the Alex Jones show this past February that the POW’s hate John McCain and that he is a "lying skunk". McLamb also added that the Vietnamese Communists called McCain "songbird", because he would come into the camp singing and telling them everything they wanted to know.

Why didn’t we see Jack McLamb as a guest on The Factor? Hmmm? That would have been "fair and balanced", right? We can’t have any of that now, can we?

O’ Reilly claimed that John McCain’s broken arm was due to the "torture" he had supposedly sustained from the North Vietnamese, but McLamb told Alex Jones that POW’s told him that McCain suffered 2 broken arms and a leg injury from not pulling his arms in when he bailed out of his A-4 Skyhawk when he was shot down over the Truc Bach Lake in Hanoi.

PrisonPlanet writer Paul Joseph Watson wrote an excellent story on this back in February. Click here for the story.

It’s not just O’ Reilly’s blatant spin and deception here that needs to be exposed, but his obvious attempt to kill any attempt to provide him with the facts by saying, "I don’t think he [McCain] has to say anything…I wouldn’t if I were him on this. I’d just let it go."

What O’ Reilly was REALLY saying here was "so, incase anyone has any proof that McCain wasn’t really tortured, don’t waste your breath or my time by emailing me or stopping me on the street with these facts because the only fact I need is John McCain’s broken arm."

This is O’ Reilly’s classic tactic: To denounce what someone is saying and vilify them simply because he disagrees with it, offering no evidence to support it, not giving anyone with an opposing view the opportunity to provide facts to counter his claim and then burying the entire issue with the ‘jailhouse lawyer’ tactic (in this case was to secretly provide advice to John McCain, that he should "let it go" and "..not say anything") under the guise of political commentary with his guest.

Why shouldn’t we question a presidential candidate on matters like this Billo? Hmm?? It would be one thing if the blogger was just making up a story out of thin air and based on nothing. But, sites like Vietnam Veterans Against John McCain and U.S. Veteran Dispatch tell us about the real John McCain from fellow soldiers-----not the "far-left loons" Billo would have us to believe these people are.

Why not have the people that run those sites on the show Billy-boy? Afraid of the truth being exposed? If the people running these sites were really "loons", then making these people appear nutty would be a very easy job, wouldn’t it Billo?

Watch the video

Here is the interview with Jack McLamb on the Alex Jones show

More audio of John McCain, the fraud

Thanks, once again, to the kind people at PrisonPlanet for posting this story