Tuesday, October 30, 2007

Homeland Security nabs UK’s International Development Minister, who they just had meetings with!! Good job boys!!!

From fake terror to now detaining people (for suspicion of terrorism) who have just attended meetings with members of its own agency….Homeland Security proves that Andy and Barney would be overqualified for their team!

by Larry Simons
October 30, 2007

After a series of meetings on fighting terrorism with Homeland Security on Monday, UK international development minister Shahid Malik (who just happens to be Muslim), was stopped at Dulles Airport. He was searched and detained, and his luggage was analyzed for traces of explosives. Who could have possibly stopped him and detained him? A couple of rookie cops on their first day of work? A couple of minimum wage security guards? NOPE!

HOMELAND SECURITY!!!! WHO HE JUST MET WITH!!!

Maybe their meetings on terrorism had to be cut short just before they got to the sessions on “why NOT to detain members of Parliament”! Of course, I’m quite sure the treatment of this government official had absolutely NOTHING at all to do with America’s embarrassing and ludicrous paranoia of Muslims (since Malik is one).

Naturally, this is not shocking when you consider who runs Homeland Security…Michael “I have a ‘gut feeling’ we will be attacked again” Chertoff. Yeah, after all, it won’t be hard finding your suspects, will it Mikey? All you have to do is hold meetings on terrorism with Muslim members of Parliament, and after they leave the meeting DETAIN THEM for suspicion of terrorism! What a complete fucking JOKE this entire administration and its appointees are!!

2 comments:

Anonymous said...

Blatant plagerism. Good work.

Real Truth Online said...

wanna tell me where I plagiarized? LOL. It's not plagiarism if I just state facts that happened. The original article says this "UK's first Muslim minister, Shahid Malik on Monday said he was detained at an American airport and his luggage analysed for traces of explosive materials." Are you saying I cant say " After a series of meetings on fighting terrorism with Homeland Security on Monday, UK international development minister Shahid Malik (who just happens to be Muslim), was stopped at Dulles Airport. He was searched and detained, and his luggage was analyzed for traces of explosives."??? They are all the FACTS of the story reworded. Plagiarism is when you say the EXACT same thing and when you usually copy the particular STYLE of the writer. For example, if some other article used my words when I say, "Who could have possibly stopped him and detained him? A couple of rookie cops on their first day of work? A couple of minimum wage security guards? NOPE!

HOMELAND SECURITY!!!! Who he JUST MET WITH!!!" See how my STYLE differs from just stating the basic facts? Plagiarism usually occurs when you are copying word for word one's original work. When you reword the basic facts, that's not copying "original" work. What was I supposed to do? Leave out basic facts? Oh, and learn how to spell "plagiarism". Idiot.