The View host lays out collapse facts to millions of ABC viewers, prominent 9/11 truthers set to appear on show
Paul Joseph Watson
May 15, 2007
Rosie O'Donnell has returned 9/11 truth to prominence by laying out the facts for the controlled demolition of the twin towers and Building 7 on ABC's The View this morning. O'Donnell also exposed the destruction of the crime scene and how the WTC metal was immediately shipped off to China.
The subject of Giuliani receiving criticism on Fox News for having had the New York emergency command bunker stationed in WTC 7 cropped up and Rosie used the opportunity to educate the audience about Building 7 and the pools of molten steel found under all three buildings that collapsed on 9/11.
Resident Neo-Con Stepford Wife Elizabeth Hasselbeck was on hand to attempt to debunk the facts but sat in silence when Rosie asked her to explain how the towers fell in seconds at the speed of almost no resistance.
We have now come to understand that prominent 9/11 film makers and other activists within the movement are scheduled to appear on The View in upcoming weeks, as well as debunkers like Popular Mechanics, but that the two camps will appear on separate shows and not engage in a debate of any kind.
Expect a week long orgy of ad hominem attack pieces from Neo-Con attack dogs like O'Reilly, Hannity and the rest of the usual suspects.
by Larry Simons
Goodness! Elizabeth Hasselbeck makes me sick….really. She’s the poster child for the average dumbed-down American who spends absolutely zero time researching facts, and admits at the end of the segment, "I take mine from Popular Mechanics". (The debunked Popular Mechanics, which has been proven debunked!) Earlier in the segment she said she’s read all the conspiracy theories. Apparently she’s ONLY read them from Popular Mechanics, because she thinks that steel can weaken at 270 degrees. Well, I guess I will never make another turkey in my oven! According to Elizabeth Hasselbeck, I will open up my oven and my turkey will be laying on the rack on fire surrounded by melted metal.
The FACT remains that steel weakens at approximately 800 degrees Celsius (which is about 1470 degrees Fahrenheit) and melts (as Rosie said) at around 2700 or 2800 degrees Fahrenheit. These numbers are FACTS regardless of who’s account you believe about 9/11. Even if Hasselbeck was correct that the fires in WTC 7 did weaken the steel, she offers no explanation as to why the building fell completely leveled all the way around the building and symmetrically, as if the fires in the building were equally burning around the perimeter of the building.
Then she says the "volcanic force" alone could have taken it down (whatever she meant by ‘volcanic force’), yet WTC 7 was the furthest building away of ALL the buildings in the WTC complex. Also, buildings right up next to WTC 1 and 2 did not collapse although the fires in those buildings were much bigger and the damage much greater. WTC 5 was completely ablaze and closer to the towers and yet did not collapse.
Hasselbeck, like most official conspiracy theory supporters simply just does not know what she’s talking about. She has not studied a thing, and depends on the debunked Popular Mechanics for her ‘facts’. I deal with people like this on a regular basis….people who claim they have the facts and yet depend on ad hominem attacks, sarcasm and ridiculous points instead of making a case.
These people are not interested in a debate, because when you provide the opportunity for one and lay out all the facts, they run like scared rabbits back to their hole to chew on more Neo-con fodder. I’ve welcomed people who post on my own site to debate me. They, too, run like little girls back to their mommies when they are met with facts, because all they have to offer is personal attacks and the same old talking points that are 2 years old, indicating they don’t study nor have interest in studying…….their only goal is to insult and bully.
At least they succeed in that!