Jim Hoffman gives an excellent presentation of the controlled demolitions of WTC 1, 2 & 7
by Larry Simons
April 9, 2007
First here is Inside Edition’s recent 9/11 conspiracy hit piece on Rosie O’ Donnell and the rest of the 9/11 truth movements’ assertion that WTC 7 was brought down by controlled demolition. Popular Mechanics’ Editor Jim Meigs says “this building (WTC 7) was brought down by the attacks of 9/11”. Boy, Jim, I bet that took hours…weeks…months to come to that conclusion! No scientific study needed for Popular Mechanics! Just say “the attacks of 9/11 caused it!”. Case closed.
Whereas, here’s Jim Hoffman giving detailed, exhaustive analysis of the controlled demolitions of all 3 buildings……and WE are nuts????
Also, in the Inside Edition hit piece, Meigs says, referring to Rosie, “You don't need to go into fanciful explanations of bombs and all sorts of other mysterious things....” Here is an hour long clip of the MANY who heard these "fanciful" explosions and bombs. I guess they are ALL crazy, huh Jim???
The Inside Edition reporter in the top clip says, "What Rosie failed to mention is the 10 story gash in WTC 7". Well, what YOU and Popular Mechanics FAIL to mention is that if the building really had this huge gash (that photo shown shows NOTHING) then why did the building fall COMPLETELY symmetrically and not tip over like a tree would tip over if a lumberjack chopped a big gash into the bottom of it? You also FAIL to mention the testimony of NY cop Steve Bartmer, who witnessed the collapse and said he heard explosions at it fell, as did many other cops who he claims "are not talking, and he doesn't know why". What you also FAIL to show us is these "raging" fires inside the building. Where? Why do you fail to mention the fact that other buildings after 9/11 have had bigger and hotter fires in them too, and yet they did not collapse. What you also FAIL to mention is if the collapse of WTC 7 is so easily explained, why did even FEMA say the fires as the cause of the collapse produced a "low probability of occurance", and why did the 9/11 Commission COMPLETELY ignore and not investigate WTC 7?? Why? Popular Mechanics have NEVER told us why the building collapsed the WAY IT DID, all they do is attempt to explain why it collapsed PERIOD. The collapse itself it just a small part of the mystery of this building. The manner in which is collapsed is what makes this a smoking gun, and that is what Popular Mechanics will NEVER discuss.
Here is a photo of WTC 5 on 9/11: Now THIS building had raging fires, but no collapse
Another great clip: