Wednesday, March 28, 2007

Bill Maher Discusses Bush's 9/11 Non-Reaction On Olbermann

by Larry Simons
March 28, 2007

Bill Maher is asked if there is one question he would put to Bush, what would it be? Maher says he would confront Bush on why he completely failed to immediately react after he was told America was under attack on 9/11.



It’s pretty simple Bill……Bush knew he was safe. It is UNHEARD OF for Secret Service agents NOT to react and get the President to safety….WITHOUT permission from the President. Bush knew he was safe and he was pretending that he "couldn’t" react immediately under the guise of not wanting to "upset" the kids. So, what’s the answer to NOT upsetting them?……putting their lives in danger!!!!!!! Remain in the school so that if a terrorist KNOWS you're there (and they would have, since his school visit was publically announced) they can crash a plane right through the goddamned school so they can kill the President, every child, teacher and faculty member! Yeah, that's the answer Bushy-boy! You can fool your blind followers all you want sir (I will NOT call you Mr. President, because you're not MY President) but for those of us who can think on their own...well...we don't buy your fairy tale, sir!

Come on Bill, get on board the 9/11 truth train and stop thinking it was all just a big meltdown of our defense system, military and intelligence agencies.

12 comments:

eugene said...

Thanks! How true!

Sherlock Holmes solved a case once because the person claiming to have been burglarized had a dog that was not barking during the night when the crime was committed. Sherlock Holmes correctly determined that the thief and the claimant were one and the same. Had anybody else been the burglar, the dog would have barked. The Secret Service were as the dog that did not bark. They failed to whisk Bush out of possible harms way. They failed to protect the school children had Bush been a target. They KNEW that Bush was safe. They KNEW that Bush was not a target. THEY KNEW!

Real Truth Online said...

AMEN EUGENE!! AMEN!!

eugene said...

Jas, you give yourself way too much credit for intelligence. You certainly are not an idiot, but you quote rely on source such as the Popular Mechanics article and the 9/11 Commission. The Commission had a job to do and they did it. Their job was to provide a cover for the criminals, a white wash job. Bush and Cheney weren't going to allow an investigation until they were assured of the results. The 9/11 Commission did just that. If obstacles got in the way, such as the collapse of Building 7, they just ignored them, no mention, pretended that these thing just did not exist. Ha! Ha! aren't you the gullible one?
And Popular Mechanics, they did address building 7, they claimed that it was "pulled" meaning with cables. Well, how stupid was that? And then one of the editors goes on the radio to defend his article and the radio DJ asks him how were they able to identify the hijackers using DNA? Where did the pre death DNA comparison samples come from. The PM guy fell apart and became a stuttering idiot. No sir Jas. You may not be an idiot, but you sure as hell aren't very bright either.

Why do you waste so much time writing a full length article in order to harass Larry? Are you some kind of sick stalker?

There will come a day when they truth about 9/11 breaks free and is excepted through out the world. I hoe Larry is saving your response in a file. I would write a book someday and use you as an example of the ignorant assholes that we had to deal with as we struggled to expose the equivalent of Adolph Hitler’s Third Reich having stolen the US government and attacked the US.

You are a childish moron. I expect you to now write a long ( please do not short change me) drawn out response. In it call me names. If you do not curse, i might feel cheated. Come on and give us some of that silly crap that i refer to as just " All that Jas!"

eugene said...

Jas, you give yourself way too much credit for intelligence. You may not be an idiot, but your quotes rely on sources such as the Popular Mechanics article and the 9/11 Commission. The Commission had a job to do and they did it. Their job was to provide a cover for the criminals, a white wash job. Bush and Cheney weren't going to allow an investigation until they were assured of the results. The 9/11 Commission did just that. If obstacles got in the way, such as the collapse of Building 7, they just ignored them, no mention, they merely pretended that these thing just did not exist. Ha! Ha! Aren't you the gullible one?

And Popular Mechanics, they did address building 7, they claimed that it was "pulled" meaning as with cables. Well, how stupid was that? And then one of the editors goes on the radio to defend his article and the radio DJ asks him how were they able to identify the hijackers using DNA? Where did the pre death DNA comparison samples come from. The PM guy fell apart and became a stuttering idiot. No sir Jas. You may not be an idiot, but you sure as hell aren't very bright either.

Why do you waste so much time writing a full length article in order to harass Larry? Are you some kind of sick stalker?

There will come a day when they truth about 9/11 breaks free and is excepted through out the world. The proof is plain to see, all one has to do is be open enough to look. I hope that Larry is saving your responses in a file. If I were him, I would write a book someday and use you as an example of the ignorant assholes that we had to deal with as we struggled to expose the equivalent of Adolph Hitler’s Third Reich having stolen the US government and attacked the US.

You are a childish moron. I expect you to now write a long ( please do not short change me) drawn out response. In it call me names. If you do not curse, i might feel cheated. Come on and give us some of that silly crap that I refer to as just " All that Jas!"

real truth said...

LOL! the fact that Jas has been sitting there waiting for me to take off moderation and then posts the SAME shit says 1) he's psycho and he constantly monitors my site to see if Ive LET him speak and 2) he has ZERO original thoughts!

I LOVE IT!!!!!!

real truth said...

Eugene, I dont have to save his posts. He has Re-posted EVERYTHING except the posts where he PROMISED to debate me when I posted facts-----I DID-----and I havent heard ONE debate start yet!! He's an asshole, a liar and a thoughtless buffoon! Everytime he posts that SAME post---his credibility crumbles and I only know ONE person with that much repetitive stupidity---one of my brothers---and since he has come online posing as someone different as the last time, I think I will follow through on my promise of months ago. Since he hates truth---and I love truth, I will expose a little truth.

real truth said...

Eugene, notice how Jas never re-posted these comments of HIS?:

10. Yawn. Is that the best you've got Larry?
Larry what does the Mineta interview prove. Answer: Nothing.
March 16, 2007 11:56:00 PM EDT

9. Sure would like to see your list of all those involved in the 9/11 conspiracy who you've implicated on your joke of a website Larry.
Also one fact would be nice.
Waiting on nothing I'm sure.
March 17, 2007 12:23:00 AM EDT

8. I've also taken several Master's level courses on related subjects which is more than you can say with your high school education and your complete and total reliance on unreliable and discreditable websites for your ridiculous 9/11 theories posted by crackpots with no education like yourself.
March 16, 2007 1:54:00 PM EDT

7. I'm still waiting on a "fact" Larry.
And if Douglas Herman calls American's cowards and you agree with him as you say then you must think Americans are cowards. that's plain english scooter.
March 16, 2007 11:03:00 PM EDT

6. Larry, I guess you haven't been reading my posts, just deleting them because I shred your 9/11 theory to bits
March 13, 2007 6:07:00 PM EDT

5. I still have yet to see any real evidence ever posted on this entire site. You have no proof whatsoever. NONE!
What exactly do you need me to refute Larry? If there was a "mountain" of evidence surely you should hire a lawyer and sue all the people who are involved in this massive conspiracy of yours
March 16, 2007 1:08:00 PM EDT


4. God this is way too easy making you look a fool.
March 16, 2007 1:32:00 PM EDT


THIS ONE'S MY FAVORITE:
3. Give me one fact Larry, your best one and I'll glady refute it. Or better yet give me your top 10 "Facts" and I'll refute them all one by one.
I'm waiting now Larry. Your top 10 facts and your list of those you've implicated who are involved on your site.
March 16, 2007 5:55:00 PM EDT

2. Hilarious that you have to work on coming up with 10 facts for me and then you attempt to give me one fact and you can't even do that! YOU CAN'T GIVE ONE FACT LARRY! I'M TRULY LAUGHING MY ASS OFF NOW! You're speculating about things you don't know and making baseless accusations as usual scooter. You and all the other "truthers." Everything with you clods is a case of one plus one equals three. It's a piling up of improbabilities.
Geesh is that the best you've got? Pathetic. Speculation isn't a fact scooter. Still waiting on one fact.
March 16, 2007 11:38:00 PM EDT


1. Still waiting on one fact.
March 17, 2007 12:05:00 AM EDT

Anonymous said...

Jas has some good points realtruth and eugene. All you have are questions not really any facts and I think I'd prefer to be on the side of Chomsky than Rosie O'Donnell. Also realtruth does more insulting if jas's posts are true stemming back a few years. I'm liberal too and agree with lots of stuff on this site but the 9/11conspiracy. I found your site by google, am impressed by the website quality, but not your disrespectful argument style and the 9/11 beliefs.

real truth said...

a few YEARS??? Ive had this site up since November 2006. How does that constitute "a few years?" WHERE are Jas's good points? All he has done is say things he doesnt deliver. All the quotes I posted from him above this post he typed like 2 weeks ago PROMISING to start a debate when I laid out facts. I answered him with my top 10 reasons 9/11 is an inside job---which is in the archives. Its PACKED with facts, and yet Jas has IGNORED them. YOU either are Jas posing as one of his many personalities or you simply are like all the others I confront about the topic of 9/11---you simply have no clue what youre talking about-----as evidenced by your "few years back" line. Why dont you try ADDRESSING SPECIFIC points rather than just to say "youre a kook about 9/11" or "I dont agree with you". Thats what Jas has been doing......AVOIDING specific issues. Why dont you tell me WHAT Im wrong about? Pick something....ONE thing. CAN you? or WONT you?

eugene said...

I googled "real truth" - Congradulations Larry, you are #19 out of 99,900,000 hits.
As time goes by you will move up. I keep mentioning this site else where. I hope you do get more people questioning your beliefs on 9/11. If they are questioning, then they are open minded.

real truth said...

that's right Eugene---I know the Jas' of the world will find this hard to believe----but I NEVER say that people who disagree with me are stupid. Ignorance and stupidity are not the same thing. Ignorance is just not having the facts (which is what I was for 3 years after 9/11)----stupidity is being given the facts and having them right in your lap and ignoring them (Jas, Tweddle....)

real truth said...

actually Eugene, that site you said was 19th is not my site. I clicked it---it's some other site called "The Real Truth". The link was "trtruth.blogspot.com". I understand how it confused you, but it's not mine. No one yet has told me how you get your site to appear in the first 10 searches when you search certain words. If you find out, tell me how.