Wednesday, February 28, 2007

Time Stamp Confirms BBC Reported WTC 7 Collapse 26 Minutes In Advance

Debunkers' claims about blue screens, inconclusive time frame of Jane Standley footage eviscerated

Paul Joseph Watson
Prison Planet
February 28, 2007

If there was any remaining doubt that the BBC reported the collapse of Building 7 over 20 minutes before it fell then it has now evaporated with the discovery of footage from the BBC's News 24 channel that shows the time stamp at 21:54 (4:54PM EST) when news of the Salomon Brothers Building is first broadcast, a full 26 minutes in advance of its collapse.

According to FEMA, WTC 7 collapsed at 5:20pm on the afternoon of 9/11. Since British Summer Time is five hours ahead of Eastern Standard Time, the BBC reported the collapse of Building 7 at 4:54PM EST, a full 26 minutes before it collapsed.
"News is continuing to come in as you can imagine. We're now being told that another enormous building in New York has collapsed. It is the 47-story Salomon Brothers building [better known as WTC Building 7] which was situated very close to the World Trade Center, right there in this financial capitol," states the anchor Gavin Estler.
Following the controversy created by Monday's footage in which BBC correspondent Jane Standley is seen live in New York reporting the collapse of Building 7 as it remains standing behind her, many debunkers tried to claim that the images were inconclusive because there was no time stamp on the footage. Others alleged that Standley was merely standing in front of a dated blue screen image and that the shot in her background was a recording from earlier in the day. Both these objections can now be easily dismissed by the addition of the News 24 footage confirming that the news that Building 7 had collapsed was prematurely reported by 26 minutes.
Since the BBC obviously had a source for this information, though they refuse to acknowledge exactly what that source was, it can be surmised that the news took a few minutes to make its way to the on air anchor, therefore we can approximate that someone knew Building 7 was going to collapse at least half an hour before it fell. However, if we factor in CNN's Aaron Brown reporting that Building 7 "has collapsed or is collapsing" at 4:15PM EST, then that's over an hour before the building imploded into its own footprint.
First responders, firefighters and police are all on the record as stating they were told Building 7 was to be "brought down" and many took that to mean that it was going to be intentionally demolished by means of explosives. Some even reported a 20 second countdown preceding the building's collapse, which can only mean one thing - that it was deliberately imploded according to a pre-determined schedule.

Building 7 stood 355 feet away from the north tower. Structures closer to the twin towers that were bombarded with debris and essentially hollowed out remained standing for weeks after 9/11, until they were demolished by explosive crews, whereas Building 7 suffered relatively little damage and yet imploded hours after the towers fell. In their Conspiracy Files "documentary" the BBC said WTC 7 was a "raging inferno" when in fact fires were confined to just eight floors according to FEMA.

World Trade Center Building 3 (pictured above), known publicly as the 22-story Marriott Hotel positioned between the twin towers, was heavily damaged during the collapse of WTC 2, yet it did not experience uniform collapse either vertically or horizontally.
The BBC's pathetic excuse for not being able to confirm that they reported the collapse of WTC 7 in advance, that they lost the tapes of the BBC World 9/11 coverage, was nothing more than an attempt to make questions about this huge controversy go away. It remains to be seen if they'll issue another response now that it is 100% certified that they reported the collapse of a building 26 minutes before it happened. So far wider mainstream coverage of this mammoth story has been all but mute.
We received an interesting e mail from a CNN archivist in Atlanta who stated their utter disbelief at the notion that BBC has lost any of their 9/11 archives.
"I'm an archivist with the CNN News Library in Atlanta, and I can tell you with absolute certainty, the mere idea that news agencies such as ours would "misplace" any airchecks from 9/11 is preposterous. CNN has these tapes locked away from all the others. People like myself, who normally would have access to any tapes in our library, must ask special permission in order to view airchecks from that day. Multiple tapes would have been recording their broadcast that day, and there are also private agencies that record all broadcasts from all channels - constantly - in the event that a news agency missed something or needs something. They don't just have one copy... they have several. It's standard procedure, and as soon as the second plane hit, they would start recording several copies on other tapes machines all day long."
"The only information they need to give out is the source of the collapse claim. No one is saying the BBC is "part of the conspiracy," we're saying that someone gave that reporter the information ahead of time. The source of that information is the only thing they can reveal that would be meaningful."
Just ten days after the airing of its bias, error ridden, propagandistic hit piece against the 9/11 truth movement, the BBC's program directors are probably wishing they had never gone near the subject. The response metered out against them, bolstered by the Building 7 fiasco, has tarnished the corporation's credibility and their sophistic attempt to rebut the accusations has only made matters worse.
Suffice to say it would be a very stupid decision to re-air Guy Smith's farce of a documentary in any country ever again. Perhaps the BBC could do us all a favor and 'lose' the tapes just like they claim to have lost the tapes of their 9/11 coverage.


AARON BROWN QUESTIONS SCRIPT ON-AIR, UNLIKE BBC

CNN’s Aaron Brown also reported the coming collapse or collapse of WTC 7 over an HOUR before it collapsed; but says "We are TOLD this building may collapse"………..WHO told you this Aaron???




It is interesting to note that Aaron Brown seems to realize the incongruity of his reporting as he looks over his shoulder at Building 7-- still standing and emitting massive trails of smoke.
Just after announcing that WTC 7 "has collapsed or is collapsing," he lets onto his confusion, stating:
"And I—I—You, to be honest, can see these pictures more clearly than I, but building number 7, one of the buildings in this very large complex of buildings that is that is the trade center."
Clearly, Brown, slicker than the BBC reporter, caught the errors in the script during live coverage and revised his words, saying instead-- as he looked at the standing structure:
"And now we are told that there’s a fire there and that building may collapse as well as you can see."

26 comments:

Eugene Davis said...

I have VHS tapes of tv coverage that I made on 9/11 and days afterwards. I have been watching them the last few days. Here are just a few observations. Just before the first tower collapses, liquid metal can be seen pooring down the side of the building. Almost imediately the case against Osama bin Laden was made as if scripted. NO Mention of Building 7 on BBC or any station after 9/11/01. It was like it never was there.

Real Truth Online said...

Eugene, get me those tapes!!! I have been wanting to get tapes of 9/11 coverage of that day and I cant get any. I want to put them on DVD. Can you get me the tapes? Email my regular email for my address.

Anonymous said...

I have live tapes from that day as well, 6 hours of mostly cnn and msnbc... but your site is just retarded (and I despise Bush and O'Reilly) and so are your views on 9/11. Take some medication.

Real Truth Online said...

ahhh, I love it. The ole "I'll name call and ridicule something and call it retarded, but yet not offer one example of what I am criticizing". Typical of people who can't stand up to facts. When I put something down I usually back it up with an EXAMPLE of WHY Im saying it. Can you give one example? Just one?? I doubt it.

Eugene said...

Anonymous March 2, 2007 10:56:00 -spelling and punctuaion were okay, must not be Tweddle. What a shame there is a 2nd idiot on the loose.

Anonymous said...

Yes, I suppose Huffington, Olberman, Maher, Chomsky, Carlin and all the others you idolize are idiots too. I suppose they're not reporting on the "facts" you claim because they're in on the 9/11 conspiracy along with the BBC and Popular Mechanics. Tell me why aren't they reporting the "facts" Larry? Did they help plant the explosives too? Get a life morons.

Anonymous said...

Why doesn't Chomsky report the facts Larry???

Real Truth Online said...

Because Noam Chomsky is the ringleader of the left gatekeepers. You prove my point everytime you use the "left" not believing in the 9/11 cover-up as "proof" there is no cover-up. You just solidify my stance that the 9/11 cover-up transcends political party, it transcends race, age, sex, etc.... This is not a RIGHT/LEFT issue. It's a RIGHT/WRONG issue. I dont care if Bill Maher thinks 9/11 truth people are nuts. That doesnt make HIM right. Ive said this a trillion times... I'll say it again------>I AM AN INDEPENDANT!! I am NOT a Democrat. Stop using your tools of propaganda to attempt to silence us. NOTHING will silence us. I love Olbermann (correct spelling) too, but if he doesnt think there's no 9/11 cover-up, I dont care! What dont you get???? I dont base my opinions on how many liberal, far left people dont buy into the cover-up. You can try all you want to spew your propaganda on me, but it wont work. I cant even say 'nice try', because it was such a weak attempt.

Jas said...

Exactly you're so much smarter than all of them put together... there sitting at home in podunk hicksville Hagersbush looking up crackpot websites at 3am instead of actually going to college or reading scholarly publications on these matters. "OH MY GOD THE BBC TIMESTAMP PROVES IT ALL! PEOPLE WHO DON'T BELIEVE BUSH IS BEHIND 9/11 ARE COWARDS AND COMPLACENT! ACTOR CHARLIE SHEEN SAID THERE'S A COVERUP! POPULAR MECHANICS, THE BBC, THE OWNER OF BUILDING 7, EVERY MEMBER OF THE BUSH ADMINISTRATION, THE CIA, FBI, NSA AND PENTAGON OFFICIALS ARE ALL PART OF THIS MASSIVE CONSPIRACY!" DON'T TRUST THE N.Y. TIMES, ABC, CNN, FOX NEWS, MSNBC, OR YOUR OWN SENSE OF REASON AND INTELLIGENCE EVERONE... TRUST LARRY AND THE TRUTH SHAL SET YOU FREE!!!

Dude seriously, I saw your picture... you're young and that gives you somewhat of a pass but that still doesn't mean you're not in need of some serious medication. I'm one of the folks that think Bush and the lot should be tried for war crimes for the Iraq fiasco but every bit of "evidence" you provide on 9/11 is looney toons. The people you quote and provide stories from are nutbags and have absolutely no credibility. I bet you've never even heard of Chomsky who would never let something like this B.S. conspiracy go unstudied.

Yes, let us all bow to Larry Simons who sits at home at night in his mommy's basement cuttting and pasting junk he finds on the internet and thinks he's smarter than the thousands of scientists, scholars, journalists and eyeball witnesses who know more about 9/11 than he could ever hope. Thanks for providing the truth for us uneducated cowards and complacent morons Larry. And to think how comfortable we all were not questioning authority until you came along and opened our eyes to how government is corrupt. God Bless you Larry Simons and God Bless America!

real truth online said...

That's not fair Jas, I'm schizophrenic and haven't taken my medicine for weeks. Who sent you to my site? The CIA? NASA? George Carlin? Hold on a sec... gummi bears eating my brain!

Larry Simon's other personality said...

Go ahead Larry and now pull a Bill O'Reilly and tell me how I made your arguement stronger. No spin from you eh? You're agruement transcends anything any of us morons could imagine.

Just a lot of nonsensical babble and paranoia mixed with delusions of persecution and grandeur on this site when it comes to 9/11. I have one word for you Larry...

Haldol.

Real Truth Online said...

ahhh, lol---so NOW we resort to POSING as me!! Good move guys! Yeah, thats what people with the TRUTH do, they POSE as others and create phony posts making it appear as if its the person you're attacking making the post! Who are you trying to fool with that fake ass post? Usually I would delete a post like that, but I'll leave it up just to show people how LOW people who claim to possess the truth and attack US will stoop to make their weak ass points. Are you THAT cowardly that you have to POSE as me? WOW! Once AGAIN, more insults and ZERO substance, ZERO facts, just insults and ridicule. Do you realize that I actually LOVE that you're insulting me? Because it means Im RIGHT and you have NOTHING, NOTHING...ZERO in your arsenal BUT insults! Keep up the posing, keep up the insults.....it SOLIDIFIES my views. Why dont you actually try something NEW? Like...DEBATING an issue! Because.....YOU CANT? I cant wait for more insults so more credence will be given to my views. More insults guys, come on. When you insult, you make my job VERY easy. So, please, more insults!

Anonymous said...

your "job", lol

Anonymous said...

popular machanics is just one of hundreds of websites I'd believe over the garbage on this site. They totally dismantle every one of your "facts."

EVERY ONE!

END of story.

Eugene said...

The publicizing editor went on one radio show to defend his article. He stated that the highjack were identified by DNA. When the radio host asked were did the comparison samples come from, he was stumped and began stammering. He then stated that he would have to get back to the host with the answer, something he has never did, nor has he done any more interviews. One question people should be asking is why does the Hearse Corporation feel the need to even try to defend the official story using the lame Popular Mechanics piece?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jnbpz9udYus&mode=related&search Bomb 6 seconds into the 17 second video

Real Truth Online said...

totally dismantle us huh? Let's hear one! Just one, thats all I ask for....ONE. Just name ONE example where PM dismantles us? Can you do that? Im sure you cant and wont. You will come back on and dodge and deflect again with a post saying something about "raking meds" or "kooks"----hence IGNORING us. Eugene, I have the entire 23 minute interview on this very page right below my list of sites. Im sure Mr "anonymous" didnt listen to it. He's afraid to. He's also afraid of addressing anything SPECIFIC. He's like a missionary that goes to another country and tries convincing people the Bible is true by saying "It's just true alright! It's true because Jesus said so. All the other religions are false, only Jesus makes sense"---and yet gives NO reason why his claim is true and NO reason why people should follow. These people dont want to discuss anything specific because in doing that, they risk running into an issue that they didnt read about in PM --and of course, if they didnt read it in PM--they're stuck. Davin Coburn said there was a HUGE chucnk taken out of WTC 7 and they saw pictures of this! How? How did THEY see pictures of this when NO ONE else can? Why wouldnt we be able to see them now, even if they were kept hush hush because of the Moussoui trial? That trial is OVER----why cant we see them NOW? HMMMMMMMMM?????????????????????????????????????????? I will tell you why. THEY DONT EXIST! Thats why. And why (if they DID exist) would the police show them to OF ALL PEOPLE...MAGAZINE PUBLISHERS!! Wouldnt they be the LAST people on Earth they'd show them to? My biggest problem with this "chunk" story from WTC 7 is if it is TRUE that the building fell because of this huge "chunk"-----then why didnt the building TOPPLE OVER??? If you take an axe and go chop a true down and take a HUGE chunk from the base of a tree, the tree TOPPLES over and you yell "timber!" and watch it fall. Does the tree fall totally symetrically with the very top of the tree collapsing FIRST?? What made that penthouse at the very top collapse FIRST? We've all seen the video----the very first thing to BUDGE on that building is the very top of the penthouse. That can ONLY happen if the INSIDE CORES of the building are completely blown out first----not some big fucking "CHUNK" in the FRONT of the building! I know what dickhead "anonymous" will say, I can see it now----he'll say, "now youre comparing buildings to trees?"--LOL----a statement of TOTAL avoidance of the issues of my post! Doesnt matter if its a building, a tree, a cactus, or a telephone poll---if you have a giant chunk taken away of ANY of these objects, it will TOPPLE OVER, not fall symetrically! It can ONLY come down the way it did if it is blasted out below it FIRST and might I add it has to be rigged with explosives ALL the way around it---leveled. If only 3 sides are rigged, only 3 sides will fall and the 4th will crumble or "give way" because of the other 3 sides collapsing. This building fell COMPLETELY symetrically and LEVELED---meaning ALL 4 sides AND the central core were taken out by explosives! THATS your end of story! Like I said MORON, give ONE example where PM dismantles the truth-----ONE.

Real Truth Online said...

"taking meds" --that is

George Carlin said...

everything they said point for point... everything dismantles your entire worthless arguement

Eugene and Larry must be the same person, there can't be 2 people out there who believe this crap lol

Real Truth Online said...

and yet you cant or WONT give us an example!!!! I wonder why that is?????????????????????? It's real fucking easy to just sit there and generalize and say "PM dismantles you" but yet you dont give ONE example-----WHY???? You have the TRUTH right??? Why are you AVOIDING giving examples?? I'm pretty sure why, but I want to hear your bullshit reason!

George Bush said...

Why don't you read a reputable source concerning the events instead of false info from bogus websites. I'm pretty sure I know why you won't butI want to hear your bullshit reason!

michael Jackson said...

Oh no, SuperLarry is going to know where we post from, Fayetteville or Hagerstown... you're not some sort of sex predator are you Larry?

real truth online said...

No, Im not Bill O'Liar---sex predator and defender of sex predators---although he's YOUR hero. Good job STILL not addressing my questions. You keep solidifying our side. Keep it up!

Jas said...

Actually Larry you do more to damage your cause than you'll ever know. Its people like you who make it easier for the "right wing" to garnish support for their pathetic causes.

real truth online said...

any SPECIFIC examples of what you just said?? Of course not

Jas said...
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
Anonymous said...
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.